https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95903
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e29959c5fcd6c37b426c2939d7ba0c199b40d1ac
commit r10-8384-ge29959c5fcd6c37b426c2939d7ba0c199b40d1ac
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, prop_design at protonmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957
>
> --- Comment #22 from Anthony ---
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95926
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95913
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95620
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you for the patch H.J.!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95916
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95939
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95713
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95957
Bug ID: 95957
Summary: All lines except for the last one in multiline
constructor reported as not run
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95857
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95638
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So fixed on the trunk, waiting for 10 backport?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95939
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> I can't reproduce it with current master.
Agreed. It seems to have gone away by 20200628.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95953
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95939
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95940
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95941
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95942
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95949
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8.4.1 regression] gcc-8|[8 Regression] gcc-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95854
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35cf3c55165efe8226cb9e5397ab0620130396ea
commit r11-1704-g35cf3c55165efe8226cb9e5397ab0620130396ea
Author: Kaipeng Zhou
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95958
Bug ID: 95958
Summary: [meta-bug] Inefficient arm_neon.h code for AArch64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95958
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95915
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Ville Voutilainen
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:deb9c51ca71d3cb507dd91ab8bfd8c1021effd9f
commit r10-8386-gdeb9c51ca71d3cb507dd91ab8bfd8c1021effd9f
Author: Ville Voutil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95915
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95957
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95664
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95958
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95904
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ville.voutilainen at
gmail do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95691
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Bug ID: 95959
Summary: Error in conversion from UTF16 to UTF8
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Created attachment 48800
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48800&action=edit
Patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
> We can't ignore them unless VEC_COND_EXPR lowering will process them.
> That is, we have to check whether we can expand all instances of the
> compares. This basically means we need to run "isel" on them
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95519
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6efc255f3bd347a6cd13737d8cf3540eb938f424
commit r10-8388-g6efc255f3bd347a6cd13737d8cf3540eb938f424
Author: Iain Sandoe
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86568
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe7c43a7bc72931941dec20df0df5993c932f964
commit r11-1707-gfe7c43a7bc72931941dec20df0df5993c932f964
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95953
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95960
Bug ID: 95960
Summary: GCC should re-vectorize vector code with larger VF
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95638
--- Comment #9 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> So fixed on the trunk, waiting for 10 backport?
Sorry, https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95804 is also in this part
which I believe is related to this fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95961
Bug ID: 95961
Summary: ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2182
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95960
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 48801
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48801&action=edit
start
So quick experiments show where we need to do adjustments. We do have
an explicit SLP_TREE_LANES we cou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86568
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:baa4578911dbcc247110934505efdb6590e0f1b6
commit r11-1708-gbaa4578911dbcc247110934505efdb6590e0f1b6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95916
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a4a52e359ba16a2516a735dca838af512b19336
commit r11-1710-g9a4a52e359ba16a2516a735dca838af512b19336
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95949
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Please provide preprocessed source for Eminem.cpp, compiled with -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95962
Bug ID: 95962
Summary: Inefficient code for simple arm_neon.h iota operation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86568
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95d7d7f92924bca0dc04df95b14d7d1b56f92d98
commit r11-1711-g95d7d7f92924bca0dc04df95b14d7d1b56f92d98
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95944
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963
Bug ID: 95963
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
contains_struct_check)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95964
Bug ID: 95964
Summary: AArch64 arm_neon.h arithmetic functions lack
appropriate attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71706
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6cc67f6616c96f3e18a434e0c74ba2f3818cb6d
commit r11-1712-ge6cc67f6616c96f3e18a434e0c74ba2f3818cb6d
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95965
Bug ID: 95965
Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap failure on sparc due to
"register"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95964
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
You could use fnspec attributes to improve things but of course open-coding
those as GIMPLE is preferable (last resort is to "fold" the calls to
GIMPLE sequences as powerpc does for select builtins).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95674
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #3)
> > I looked at this problem.
> >
> > All assignments are done in IRA (LRA does not change them). We ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957
--- Comment #24 from Anthony ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #23)
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, prop_design at protonmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957
> >
> > --- Comment #22 from Anthony ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95940
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95964
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You could use fnspec attributes to improve things but of course open-coding
> those as GIMPLE is preferable (last resort is to "fold" the calls to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95568
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1005f553d3543bb56dc6b9b34ee35455d697ca4
commit r11-1713-gb1005f553d3543bb56dc6b9b34ee35455d697ca4
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95966
Bug ID: 95966
Summary: soft float operations are not tail called
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94553
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54980635c537f3130481da2d8b1109c775db8bb0
commit r11-1714-g54980635c537f3130481da2d8b1109c775db8bb0
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94553
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 94553, which changed state.
Bug 94553 Summary: Revise [basic.scope.declarative]/4.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94553
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95965
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95568
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95967
Bug ID: 95967
Summary: Poor aarch64 vector constructor code when using
arm_neon.h
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95967
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 48802
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48802&action=edit
6 constructor functions
This time with attachment -- not sure what happened last time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95968
Bug ID: 95968
Summary: error: 'args#0' is not a constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95880
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3942f91376ba29a8014fd19f7719c5697ac05e8
commit r10-8389-ge3942f91376ba29a8014fd19f7719c5697ac05e8
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95340
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:687147abdfccc1b53adc9a2d31e419719f3deaab
commit r10-8390-g687147abdfccc1b53adc9a2d31e419719f3deaab
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95340
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95969
Bug ID: 95969
Summary: Use of __builtin_aarch64_im_lane_boundsi in AArch64
arm_neon.h interferes with gimple optimisation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95880
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95970
Bug ID: 95970
Summary: gcc/go/gofrontend/types.cc:1474:34: warning: ‘this’
pointer null
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95949
--- Comment #5 from Julian Sikorski ---
Created attachment 48803
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48803&action=edit
Preprocessed emumem.cpp source
Preprocessed source obtained with:
make SOURCES=src/mame/drivers/model1.cpp RE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #3 from Will Schmidt ---
Couldn't duplicate on P8/BE. I still have a couple builds going to see if I
can duplicate elsewhere.
I see "--with-cpu=default32 " in the config string. Is this an older hardware
platform?
thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95971
Bug ID: 95971
Summary: [10 regression] Optimizer converts a false boolean
value into a true boolean value
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95971
--- Comment #2 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail
dot com> ---
Created attachment 48805
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48805&action=edit
b.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95971
--- Comment #1 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail
dot com> ---
Created attachment 48804
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48804&action=edit
a.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95971
--- Comment #3 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail
dot com> ---
Created attachment 48806
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48806&action=edit
Makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95972
Bug ID: 95972
Summary: ICE in check_member_template, at cp/decl2.c:570
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95973
Bug ID: 95973
Summary: Add __cpuidex
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95974
Bug ID: 95974
Summary: AArch64 arm_neon.h stores interfere with gimple
optimisations
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95975
Bug ID: 95975
Summary: -Wstrict-aliasing=1 false negative for std::pair
member at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95970
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95976
Bug ID: 95976
Summary: [[no_unique_address]] on union members has the
opposite-of-intended effect
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> I can help you build a default32 gcc if just adding -m32 to your
> compile doesn't ICE on the test case.
I should mention, it's not as easy as just configuring w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95970
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
I think the warning is a false positive. The problem call is introduced by
early inlining and is eliminated by path isolation, but the -Wnonnull warning
code runs before that happens (by the post_ipa_warn pas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95949
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> > I can help you build a default32 gcc if just adding -m32 to your
> > compile doesn't ICE on the test case.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95949
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95977
Bug ID: 95977
Summary: No deallocation of temporary in return-statement
during constant evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95970
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
On second thought, I think the warning might be correct. The function it's
issued for is a static member of class Type (I at first thought it was
virtual):
Expression*
Type::type_descriptor(Gogo* gogo, Type*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95970
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I'm having a hard time parsing the warning. It says
gcc/go/gofrontend/types.cc:1474:34: warning: ‘this’ pointer null [-Wnonnull]
The line is
return type->do_type_descriptor(gogo, NULL);
Is this tryi
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo