https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
From
/* There's no CCP pass after PRE which would re-compute alignment
information so make sure we re-materialize this here. */
if (gimple_call_builtin_p (call, BUILT_IN_AS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #12 from Laurent Stacul ---
Ok I think we will not waste time on this one. Actually, the build system
allows to force the standard version to build the libfolly.so (in out case
gnu++20) but somehow the tests are build with -std=gnu++1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Summary|[10 regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94164
Bug ID: 94164
Summary: [Regression 10] std::unintialized_fill_n fails to
compile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
E.g. in tree-ssa-ccp.c, we drop very large alignments on the floor.
/* Trailing mask bits specify the alignment, trailing value
bits the misalignment. */
tem = val->mask.to_u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87560
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
commit r9-8370-gde8e3b71c8bec6dde60e6ee70c73d6895c67d782
Author: Bill Schmidt
Date: Thu Mar 12 15:28:50 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix -mpower9-vector -mno-altivec ICE (PR87560)
PR87560 reports an ICE wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94119
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94119
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7152-g3e6ab5cefa81165e90fb62abf50e515f85a17e9a
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Fri Mar 13 09:58:44 2020 +0100
Fix incorrect filling of delay slots in branchy code at -O2
The issue is that r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94119
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
commit r8-10121-g92902501c2ad030d56fd3347defd00e79187c51f
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Fri Mar 13 09:58:44 2020 +0100
Fix incorrect filling of delay slots in branchy code at -O2
The issue is that r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The patch in testing does the same as CCP. I agree that we possibly want
saturation behavior but that can be done separately for GCC 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94119
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|[Regression 10]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94154
Bu Le changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It isn't clear to me what exactly disallows it, perhaps
http://eel.is/c++draft/class.spaceship#2.2
?
For auto return type
http://eel.is/c++draft/class.spaceship#4
defines what return type it should have.
If t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94164
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's not an iterator.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229
--- Comment #31 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7154-gfd8679974b2ded884ffd7d912efef7fe13e4ff4f
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Mar 13 02:48:59 2020 -0700
i386: Use ix86_output_ssemov for DFmode TYPE_SSEMOV
There is no need to set mode att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94154
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94164
--- Comment #2 from Laurent Stacul ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> That's not an iterator.
Yes sure. I reduced my example to have the minimal example. I will add all de
needed requirement of an iterator if needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92303
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #12 from Er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94165
Bug ID: 94165
Summary: Wrong "warning: this statement may fall through" after
__builtin_unreachable().
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94121
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7155-g7aa605c9d4643dc6e0a0460e5697c02457cd7278
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fri Mar 13 11:33:16 2020 +0100
aarch64: Fix another bug in aarch64_add_offset_1 [PR94121]
> I'm getting this I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93566
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94166
Bug ID: 94166
Summary: [10 Regression] random -fcompare-debug failures since
r10-1913
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94157
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93935
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94166
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This fixes it, but will try to find a testcase that fails more reliably:
--- gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c.jj 2020-01-12 11:54:38.510381771 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c 2020-03-13 14:06:32.358085863 +0100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94167
Bug ID: 94167
Summary: pr71109.c -fcompare-debug failures on x86_64 and
powerpc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94044
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I cannot reproduce this with the cross or native compilers I've tried:
native: x86_64-linux, aarch64-linux
cross: arm-eabi riscv64-unknown-linux
The cross compilers are hosted on x86_64-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87161
Simon Marchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94168
Bug ID: 94168
Summary: [10 Regression] error: extended character § is not
valid in an identifier since
r10-3309-g7d112d6670a0e0e6
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94166
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48028
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48028&action=edit
gcc10-pr94166.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94168
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-13
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
--- Comment #10 from Christophe Lyon ---
I checked the stack settings on the ARMv7 and ARMv8 machines:
ARMv7: beced000-bed0e000 rw-p 00:00 0 [stack]
ARMv8: fff12000-fff33000 rw-p 00:00 0 [stack]
In both cases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
commit r9-8373-gdb3584552871c8caccdc22e97ea1573da9458253
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Fri Mar 13 13:56:26 2020 +0100
tree-optimization/94163 constrain alignment set by PRE
This avoids HWI -> unsig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7158-g3604480a6fe493c51d6ebd53d9b1abee828f
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Fri Mar 13 13:56:26 2020 +0100
tree-optimization/94163 constrain alignment set by PRE
This avoids HWI -> uns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94167
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
--- Comment #23 from Martin Sebor ---
I think that's a question for the release managers. I thought they like to
keep regressions open until all the affected branches have closed, but I could
be wrong. One way to find out is to close it and let
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94167
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The first changes seems to appear in the inline ipa dump:
-bar/5 (bar) @0x7face3ee7000
+bar/5 (bar) @0x7f637349f438
Type: function definition analyzed
Visibility: externally_visible public
+ Address is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67960
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94167
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94169
Bug ID: 94169
Summary: warn for modifying getenv() result
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
您為什麼抗疫失據？
您為什麼抗疫失據？
我們香港護老易有限公司是金利通上市公司的子公司。
你帶口罩保護了直接的飛沫傳染。但是一點都不足夠，你仍然讓病毒存活在你的辦公室和家居環境。其實最有效消滅病毒的手段是消毒酒精，漂白水。
專家表示，細菌在金屬、塑膠等光滑材質的物件上更容易殘留，因此對機不離手的香港人來說，
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94044
--- Comment #5 from Kito Cheng ---
Hi Nathan:
Double confirmed again, it still ICE to me, but I might miss some info so I
post my env and configure option:
GCC: g:b73f69020f08208d2d969fcf8879bd294a6e3596
Host: x86_64-linux (Ubuntu 18.04)
Targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94119
--- Comment #11 from d.dorau at avm dot de ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #10)
> Fixed on all active branches.
Thanky you very much for the quick fix! To verify I cherry-picked your commit
onto our 8.3 build and the result looks fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|10.0, 9.2.0 |9.3.0
Summary|[9/10 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94168
--- Comment #2 from Lewis Hyatt ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #0)
> I see the following regression:
>
> $ cat red.cc
> #ifdef WINDOWS
> §
> #endif
>
> $ g++-9 red.cc -c
> $ g++ red.cc -c
> red.cc:2:1: error: extended character § is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94170
Bug ID: 94170
Summary: gfortran segfault on object oriented code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94119
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I noticed that you accidentially put the wrong year into the ChangeLog.
Thanks, fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94148
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-suse-linux|powerpc*
Host|powerpc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94168
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The reasoning for rejecting this (for UCNs in both C and C++, for other
characters in C++ because of the C++ rule that such characters get
converted to UCNs) is that the constraints on perm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94044
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Still no luck.
I'm at cb99630f254 2020-03-11 | fold undefined pointer offsetting
Configured with
../../src/configure '--with-mpfr=/data/users/nathans/tools'
'--with-mpc=/data/users/nathans/tools' '--enable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90995
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93038
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93218
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Friday 13th's test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94171
Bug ID: 94171
Summary: attribute silently ignored on redeclarations of a
typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93038
--- Comment #2 from Pierrick Bouvier ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #1)
> Yes, I have too noticed this and have a fix in the gdc development branch,
> will backport it to gcc trunk as soon as I cherry-pick out parts not related
> to suppor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94148
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94148
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
commit 5c7e6d4bdf879b437b43037e10453275acabf521
Author: Segher Boessenkool
Date: Thu Mar 12 07:12:50 2020 +
df: Don't abuse bb->aux (PR94148, PR94042)
The df dataflow solvers use the aux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94099
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94105
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
--- Comment #8 from Berni ---
I just compiled AVR gcc 9.3.0 and tested the code again. Still no improvement!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733
Rich Felker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91966
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94172
Bug ID: 94172
Summary: [arm-none-eabi] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at
cfgexpand.c:5403
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94172
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>GNU Tools for Arm Embedded Processors 8-2019-q3-update
You should report this to ARM really.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94044
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93218
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
PR c/93218 - Testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93218
--- Comment #31 from CVS Commits ---
PR c/93218 - Testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93218
--- Comment #32 from CVS Commits ---
PR c/93218 - Testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93218
--- Comment #33 from CVS Commits ---
PR c/93218 - Testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92318
--- Comment #8 from cgf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
email from sourceware
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92318
--- Comment #9 from cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at gnu dot org ---
email from cgf.cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93218
--- Comment #34 from CVS Commits ---
PR c/93218 - Testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93218
--- Comment #35 from CVS Commits ---
PR c/93218 - Testing
90 matches
Mail list logo
