https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94041
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
commit r10-7110-g14af5d9b19b0f4ee1d929e505e245ae5c2f6bdc6
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tue Mar 10 16:05:18 2020 -0400
c++: Partially revert patch for PR66139.
The patch for 66139 exposed a long-st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93922
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
commit r10-7110-g14af5d9b19b0f4ee1d929e505e245ae5c2f6bdc6
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tue Mar 10 16:05:18 2020 -0400
c++: Partially revert patch for PR66139.
The patch for 66139 exposed a long-st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52320
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94134
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||pdp11-aout
--- Comment #1 from Stephen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94135
Bug ID: 94135
Summary: PPC: subfic instead of neg used for rotate right
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94085
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Casner ---
Please mark this bug RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 94134.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coryan+gccbugzilla at google
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94085
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94134
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most targets output .lcommon or similar for this case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Doing
memset(&s_myvalue, 0, sizeof(s_myvalue));
s_myreq.m_data = &s_myvalue;
also works around the issue. Odd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90332
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94136
Bug ID: 94136
Summary: GCC doc for built-in function
__builtin___clear_cache() not 100% correct
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94134
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94114
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
commit r10-7121-g312992f5a07ca25f94d538b08401789c2c764293
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Wed Mar 11 09:33:52 2020 +0100
dfp: Fix decimal_to_binary [PR94111]
As e.g. decimal_from_decnumber shows, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
commit r10-7122-g60342fdbfb0630243d2b85d2ca45204ded990b17
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Wed Mar 11 09:34:59 2020 +0100
value-prof: Fix abs uses in value-prof.c [PR93962]
Jeff has recently fixed du
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90862
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90921
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94136
Andrew Waterman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94137
Bug ID: 94137
Summary: [OpenACC] declare directive – currently *only*
permitted after variable declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
Bug ID: 94138
Summary: [gcc10] unresolvable R_X86_64_TPOFF32 relocation
against symbol when LTO activated
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #1 from Laurent Stacul ---
Created attachment 48015
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48015&action=edit
preprocessed sources
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #2 from Laurent Stacul ---
Created attachment 48016
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48016&action=edit
preprocessed sources
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94117
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Oh we have more occurrences of it in libstdc++, e.g. in split_view
Fixed in r10-7108-gcf0c3a457319df1e8dc9321227162a7c57169a39
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93922
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #9 from Stephan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94131
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94128
--- Comment #2 from Joel Yliluoma ---
Yes, it is valid.
— The auto parameter is valid since C++20. It is called a “placeholder type”,
which has existed since C++11. C++20 made it valid also in function parameters.
— The “requires” is a valid ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125
--- Comment #5 from bin cheng ---
Thanks for CCing, I will have a look this WE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94117
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #4 from Laurent Stacul ---
Well the problem of folly is that it requires lots of dependencies.
What I can do is to isolate the link command with the needed files. Amongst all
the link errors, you will get the described error.
As the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #5 from Laurent Stacul ---
I forgot to remove some arguments in the command:
/opt/1A/toolchain/x86_64-v20/bin/g++ \
-O3 -Wl,-flto -ffat-lto-objects -fuse-linker-plugin \
CacheLocalityTest.cpp.o -o cache_locality_test -L. lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94139
Bug ID: 94139
Summary: GCC9.2.0 build GCC8.2.0 break
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94139
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93699
--- Comment #1 from Laurent Stacul ---
Please note that reversing b and d works fine:
if (*b == *d) { // This does not work
if (*d == *b) { // This is ok
Regards,
Stac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94139
--- Comment #2 from 康 珊 ---
This is a benchmark from phoronix
(https://openbenchmarking.org/test/pts/build-gcc-1.1.2). The benchmark uses
gcc-8.2.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93701
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94139
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We can't retroactively fix already released versions. For bugfixes we have
release branches from which we periodically create new releases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93961
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Laurent Stacul from comment #5)
> I forgot to remove some arguments in the command:
>
> /opt/1A/toolchain/x86_64-v20/bin/g++ \
> -O3 -Wl,-flto -ffat-lto-objects -fuse-linker-plugin \
> Ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94132
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
"A structure containing a flexible array member, or a union containing such a
structure (possibly recursively), may not be a member of a structure or an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[gcc10] Invalid operator== |Invalid operator==
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93699
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
P.S. it helps to provide a testcase that doesn't have lots of spurious warnings
when compiled with -Wall -Wextra, because one of the first things I'm going to
do when triaging bug reports is compile with th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90301
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91590
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-09-02 00:00:00 |2020-3-11
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93470
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94036
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93961
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92398
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94121
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think that change to the compiler was OK, but it looks like the accompanying
"simplification" of was the culprit. Thanks for the bisection.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93956
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93709
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94117
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90763
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94023
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94095
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94063
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93564
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7093-g5dc1390b41db5c1765e25fd21dad1a930a015aac
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
Date: Mon Mar 9 14:05:09 2020 -0400
Revert: One more patch for PR93564: Prefer smaller hard regno when we do
not ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94019
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93729
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94027
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91598
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89346
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly reduced testcase:
struct A { char a[6]; void *b; };
struct B { unsigned int c, d; };
static void __attribute__((noipa))
foo (struct A *x)
{
struct B *b = (struct B *) x->b;
if (b->c != 1234 || b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And the b.d = 0; store isn't needed either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93645
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94140
Bug ID: 94140
Summary: [OpenACC] declare directive in class currently
rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48018
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48018&action=edit
gcc10-pr94130.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So I tried it with the SUSE GCC 10 packages and it works fine (I've
double-checked nvptx is offloaded). But my packages are only configured for
zlib ...
(I'm testing on Leap 15.1 which doesn't have zstd I t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, your backtrace ends up in lto_uncompression_zlib but Matthias shows the
Ubuntu packages have zstd enabled. I'd have expected only zstd compressed
sections there. Matthias, can you reproduce the issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #3)
> $ gfortran-10 -v -fopenacc program.f90 2>&1 |grep zstd
> Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
> Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
>
> af
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93699
--- Comment #4 from Laurent Stacul ---
Sorry for this, I will follow your recommendations next time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94120
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3)
> Patch for Fortran:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/current/541774.html
Patch for C + C++:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/current/541840.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-11
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94119
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94141
Bug ID: 94141
Summary: c++20 rewritten operator== recursive call mixing
friend and external operators for template class
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #7 from Laurent Stacul ---
Created attachment 48019
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48019&action=edit
preprocessed sources
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94142
Bug ID: 94142
Summary: typeof enum member appears to give wrong signedness
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94142
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Matthew Fernandez from comment #0)
> This seems surprising to me. Shouldn't x and y have the same signedness as
> they're both the type of the enum? It seems like somehow the type of an enum
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Laurent Stacul from comment #7)
> Created attachment 48019 [details]
> preprocessed sources
Thanks and last missing piece is command line how lityTest.cpp.o is compiled?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94138
--- Comment #9 from Laurent Stacul ---
Here is the command line:
g++ -E
-DFOLLY_XLOG_STRIP_PREFIXES=\"/home/docker/development/opensource-pack-builder/components/folly/BUILD/folly-2020.03.02.00:/home/docker/development/opensource-pack-builder/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85777
--- Comment #14 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #1)
> I've cleaned up the testcase:
>
> int d;
> int h(void);
> void e(void)
> {
> int f[2];
> int g = 0;
> if (d)
> g++;
> if (d == 1)
> f[g++] =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94142
Matthew Fernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRM
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo