https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91216
Bug ID: 91216
Summary: [9/10 Regression] OpenMP ICE starting with r265930
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91216
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The ICE is caused by a bad conversion of REAL(16) BOZ using an integer KIND
that does not exist with -m32 (see comment 2). The ICE is gone with
-fdefault-double-8, but is also present with -freal-8-rea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217
Bug ID: 91217
Summary: Returning std::array from lambda results in an extra
copy step on return
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
URL: https://godbolt.org/z/3zAhtv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I get the same ICE for
print *, real(b'1010101001101',16)
end
compiled with -m32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87256
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
This patch improves things by about a factor 4:
Index: expmed.h
===
--- expmed.h(revision 27)
+++ expmed.h(working copy)
@@ -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91204
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jul 20 17:13:00 2019
New Revision: 273629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/91204
* optabs.c (expand_unop): As fallback, ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91204
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53633
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Jul 20 18:50:20 2019
New Revision: 273635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix -Wreturn-type for static naked functions in C
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91218
Bug ID: 91218
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling
concepts and constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137
--- Comment #11 from bin cheng ---
Hi, suppose this patch should be backported to 8/7 if no further issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91219
Bug ID: 91219
Summary: missing warning on a past-the-end power of access by
memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #8)
> Hi. As you can see, the patch itself seems simple, but a while ago I noticed
> that quite a few testcases would need adjusting and that made me a little
> nervous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217
--- Comment #1 from milasudril at gmail dot com ---
For reference, here is a MWE:
#include
#include
template
struct CreateArray
{
using value_type = typename TargetArray::value_type;
auto operator()()
{
TargetArray
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40073
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yup, those testcases work fine for powerpc, too; and the signed versions of
those
do as well. (I couldn't find vector-types.h; I did "#define VECTOR_SIZE 16").
15 matches
Mail list logo