https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #8) > Hi. As you can see, the patch itself seems simple, but a while ago I noticed > that quite a few testcases would need adjusting and that made me a little > nervous. In particular those testcases (both C and C++) which are doing more > than one check and would have to be split, because the compilation ends > after the first #error. Which testcases are these? > Anyway, probably that's just boring work to do, what about the other > compilers? > For sure some are following the current gcc behaviour, for compatibility, I > suspect ICC for example. Should we also have a command line switch? Probably > missing #includes just unconditionally end the compilation on most compilers, > though. Well, it's also true that the so called workaround which I mentioned > in > Comment #1 works pretty well and we do have *very* few fatal errors in the > front ends...
