https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86706
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 5 07:16:15 2018
New Revision: 264103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-08-03 Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc, x86_64
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86738
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 5 07:19:27 2018
New Revision: 264104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-08-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 5 07:20:31 2018
New Revision: 264105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-08-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 5 07:21:15 2018
New Revision: 264106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-08-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87095
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 5 07:22:07 2018
New Revision: 264107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-08-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87138
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 5 07:23:00 2018
New Revision: 264108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-08-31 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87198
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 5 07:23:45 2018
New Revision: 264109
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264109&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-09-04 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87142
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87217
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Somewhat reduced:
implicit real*8 (a-h,o-z)
common clop6(3),dps(6),aml6(6,6)
dimension y1(3)
dimension dclo(3)
dimension dx(3),dy(3)
save
do 80 ii=1,itco
y1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87217
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Ah, yes. So it's picking up redundant loads defined in another loop. Not
walking outside of the region was supposed to prevent that but the
implementation was broken so I reverted it. Let me finally fix i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87222
Bug ID: 87222
Summary: ICE in setup_reg_classes, at reginfo.c:1027
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86738
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86706
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87223
Bug ID: 87223
Summary: -Os produces sub-optimal x86 machine code for
initialization with zero
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87224
Bug ID: 87224
Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2206
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87138
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87198
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 8.3+ so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87095
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87218
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87225
Bug ID: 87225
Summary: tree-vect-stmts.c:3748 error: converting to 'bool'
from 'std::nullptr_t' requires direct-initialization
[-fpermissive]
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87164
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Sep 5 08:07:48 2018
New Revision: 264111
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264111&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ignore properly -mdirect-move (PR target/87164).
2018-09-05 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87164
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87226
Bug ID: 87226
Summary: doesn't work
std::filesystem::directory_options::follow_directory_s
ymlink
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87227
Bug ID: 87227
Summary: doesn't work
std::filesystem::directory_options::follow_directory_s
ymlink
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
gcc61.fsffrance.org unfortunately seems inaccessible, can you post
-fdump-tree-esra-details dump here together with the preceeding tree
dump file?
I cannot see anything wrong with the dump excerpt that you p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87226
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
*** Bug 87227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87227
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87216
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Sep 5 09:08:07 2018
New Revision: 264113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix a scan in test for Darwin target (PR testsuite/87216).
2018-09-05 Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87216
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87162
--- Comment #6 from Wen Yang ---
We may simply construct this error scenario：
#
/var/weny/release_gcc_trunk/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/cc1
-fdump-passes -fgnu-tm applets.i
This section of code has a bug：
static bool
gate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #53 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
--- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh, and for completeness, GCC 8.1.0 -fabi-version=11 also prints a garbage
value of course:
1:2:3:4:5:4195842:6:7:8:9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87225
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 5 09:39:34 2018
New Revision: 264116
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264116&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-09-05 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/87225
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87225
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 5 09:40:35 2018
New Revision: 264117
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264117&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-09-05 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/87225
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87225
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Shane Kerr from comment #0)
> I am curious how this build ever works at all on any system!
Because on most systems NULL is defined to 0 not std::nullptr_t and 0 can be
implicitly converted to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87226
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87221
--- Comment #2 from coypu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is related to bug 81523. How did you configure GCC?
Configured with nothing related to default pie:
export ac_cv_func_freelocale=no
export ac_cv_func_newlocale=no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87185
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Sep 5 09:59:08 2018
New Revision: 264118
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87185] ICE in prune-lambdas
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87185
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87137
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Sep 5 10:04:58 2018
New Revision: 264119
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264119&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/87137] GCC-8 Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rpirrera from comment #9)
> The patch cannot be applied to the compiler we are using (GCC 5), we get a
> function not defined error.
> Is it possible to have a patch for GCC 5 too?
>
> Thank y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87137
--- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed trunk r264119
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87162
--- Comment #7 from Wen Yang ---
This patch will make it more robust:
# git diff
diff --git a/gcc/trans-mem.c b/gcc/trans-mem.c
index 1d4eb80..326e1c4 100644
--- a/gcc/trans-mem.c
+++ b/gcc/trans-mem.c
@@ -2099,6 +2099,9 @@ gate_tm_init (void)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18)
> +#ifdef __hpux
> + if (__len == -1)
> + return __s;
> +#endif
N.B. I really don't want to just abort here, nor assume that __len is valid,
an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87217
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 5 10:33:41 2018
New Revision: 264121
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264121&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-09-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87217
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87137
--- Comment #13 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed gcc-8 r264123.
changes.html remains to do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87137
--- Comment #14 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Sep 5 10:42:59 2018
New Revision: 264123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87137] GCC-8 Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/ms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87224
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux |powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87205
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Peter Dimov from comment #8)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> > I'm not sure here Y are different types here and member access based on
> > the type is distinct.
>
> Yes, one could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87228
Bug ID: 87228
Summary: num_put::_M_insert_float uses stack inefficiently
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87205
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Sep 5 11:28:49 2018
New Revision: 264124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Group switch cases in switch lowering (PR tree-optimization/87205).
2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87224
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The *mov_hardfloat64 pattern has constraint Y without also having Z.
Patch in testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87205
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 5 11:44:13 2018
New Revision: 264125
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264125&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-09-05 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/87134
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87134
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
So I've applied a patch that might fix the originally reported segfault.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87229
Bug ID: 87229
Summary: ICE: tree code 'call_expr' is not supported in LTO
streams
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-09-05 4:55 AM, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
>
> --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
> gcc61.fsffrance.org unfortunately seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87230
Bug ID: 87230
Summary: GCC should warn if [[fallthrough]] is used in the last
case in a switch
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87225
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87184
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
r263931 introduced the problem.
Unfortunately, I don't get a core dump and the behavior is different in build
at -j2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should never fail:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.tcc
@@ -1000,7 +1000,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_LDBL
// First try a buff
ng SEGVs on both
i386-pc-solaris2.11
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED======+
| 9.0.0 20180905 (experimental) [trunk revision 264125] (i386-pc-solaris2.11)
GCC error:|
| in df_bb_refs_record, at df-scan.c:3342 |
| Error detected a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #7)
> On 2018-09-05 4:55 AM, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
> >
> > --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
> > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87221
--- Comment #3 from coypu ---
I think the change in bug 81523 to make -static imply no PIE might be wrong, as
static PIE is a thing.
It might be more right to limit that change only for configurations that don't
support static PIE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87228
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87068
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87230
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-09-05 8:50 AM, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Then I believe SRA is not the culprit, you probably need to trace what
> happens to SR.13 afterwards and whether it is correctly expande
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87231
Bug ID: 87231
Summary: stdatomic.h: No such file or directory on OpenBSD 6.3
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87228
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28277
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737
--- Comment #22 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I prefer the first approach although it might loop if there is an
error. Probably, it needs
to check if the current __cs_size is less than the new __cs_size before
doing a retry.
Another opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87141
--- Comment #4 from martin ---
@Richard Biener do you need more information for this issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28277
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
My patch missed a case for num_put, which I'll fix.
Here's a crash test for codecvt::do_length in codecvt_members.cc:
#include
int main()
{
using namespace std;
auto& cvt = use_facet>(locale::class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52665
--- Comment #4 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
Author: aldot
Date: Wed Sep 5 15:31:13 2018
New Revision: 264128
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests
A branc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87232
Bug ID: 87232
Summary: modular inverse not used for is-multiple test
optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
Bug ID: 87233
Summary: Constraint C1279 still followed after f2008 standard
revision (?)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I prefer just forcing the use of vsprintf with a larger buffer, it avoids
adding more complexity to the code.
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #22)
> I prefer the first approach although it might loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87234
Bug ID: 87234
Summary: GCC should warn if template parameter redefines
default argument
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87235
Bug ID: 87235
Summary: g++ doesn't implement sparse initialisation of arrays
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87235
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
g++ -v gives:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/8/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87236
Bug ID: 87236
Summary: Using union to reinterpret from integer to floating
point goes via memory
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87236
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
IIRC this is due to a tuning for generic and if you do -mcpu=Intel it won't go
via memory. Basically on some AMD hw the path via memory is faster than the
path between the sse and gprs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87236
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87235
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87232
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87185
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Sep 5 17:32:26 2018
New Revision: 264129
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264129&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87185] ICE in prune-lambdas
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87185
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mattias.ellert at physics dot
uu.s
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
