https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86133
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86140
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
>
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
> As per the recent discussion:
> https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86140
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Thanks, now please attach output of --verbose. I need to investigate -march
options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86144
Bug ID: 86144
Summary: GCC is not generating vector math calls to svml/acml
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
--- Comment #6 from Александр Кроль ---
command: /usr/local/bin/mpic++ --verbose --save-temps -DQT_CORE_LIB
-DQT_NO_DEBUG -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5 -isystem
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore -isystem
/usr/lib/x86_64-linu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83982
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 14 09:26:51 2018
New Revision: 261585
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261585&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83982 fix exception-safety guarantee of std::vector::resize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86144
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86145
Bug ID: 86145
Summary: Inefficient homogeneous struct return
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86146
Bug ID: 86146
Summary: OpenMP not seeing more than 64 cores on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86146
--- Comment #1 from karolina1980 at realemail dot net ---
Of course it's not only about counting CPUs. They can't be used by the
application either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86146
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dannysmith at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
--- Comment #9 from Ville Voutilainen ---
The Qt problems are not fixed, this comes with the gcc-8 branch:
qtbase/include/QtCore/../../../../qtbase/src/corelib/tools/qstringliteral.h:82:30:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
([]()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
--- Comment #8 from Александр Кроль ---
Thank you. however I have not got the point of providing additional
information. I specified gcc version initially.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
--- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Reproducer:
template
void f(const char* a =
([]() noexcept -> const char* {
enum { Size = 42 - 1 };
return "";
}()));
void g()
{
f();
}
Looks like we don't handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86124
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 14 10:55:00 2018
New Revision: 261587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-14 Richard Biener
PR ipa/86124
* tree-ssa-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 14 10:55:31 2018
New Revision: 261588
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261588&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-14 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/86139
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
--- Comment #11 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Also happens with a member function of a class template, thus:
template
struct X {
void f(const char* a =
([]() noexcept -> const char* {
enum { Size = 42 - 1 };
return "";
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86147
Bug ID: 86147
Summary: Lambda is capturing a non-ODR-used constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86148
Bug ID: 86148
Summary: parameterized type compile time error
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86149
Bug ID: 86149
Summary: generic binding in derived types
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #60 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86150
Bug ID: 86150
Summary: Trunk Segmentation Fault
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85960
Bug 85960 depends on bug 86124, which changed state.
Bug 86124 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in create_variable_info_for, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:6123
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86124
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 14 12:31:46 2018
New Revision: 261591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-14 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/86139
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86150
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86090
Denis Khalikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.1.1, 9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86151
Bug ID: 86151
Summary: size() of unallocated array is nonzero
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.1.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86147
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86151
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85945
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 14 13:35:06 2018
New Revision: 261593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85945
* lower-subreg.c (find_decomposable_subreg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85945
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 14 13:36:43 2018
New Revision: 261594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85945
* lower-subreg.c (find_decomposable_subreg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86080
--- Comment #7 from Balazs Vinarz ---
Thank you Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, other uses of unsigned_type_for in match.pd seems to be guarded with
INTEGRAL_TYPE_P check or are on expressions that can't appear with complex
operands.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Note, other uses of unsigned_type_for in mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> if we want unsigned_type_for to support complex integer types or not.
I think we do (seems super easy). Testing utype can't hurt indeed.
(In reply to Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86152
Bug ID: 86152
Summary: Failure to demange clone names with digits
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
Bug ID: 86153
Summary: [9 regression] test case g++.dg/pr83239.C fails
starting with r261585
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The new trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr83239.C test has started failing, due to a
change I made to std::vector, see PR 86153
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Also reported by Donald Stence this week:
The compiler produces excessive sequences to synthesize some literal constants.
This contributes excess path length and potentially latency.
Constants requiring only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86149
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86148
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86155
Bug ID: 86155
Summary: std::thread
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86155
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32
Component|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86149
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
ASA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44269|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
ASA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44270|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
ASA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44271|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
--- Comment #11 from ASA ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> When you rename main() to foo() the calls are inlined. GCC doesn't inline
> them
> into main() because it knows they are executed exactly once which means they
> are col
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
--- Comment #12 from ASA ---
I see what you're saying now.
Indeed I compiled it without a main function with
g++ -O -S -c gccbug.cpp
and it does expand DisplayViewType inline.
Thank you for clarifying the context of the optimization issue, g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 14 19:07:45 2018
New Revision: 261606
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261606&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/86122
* match.pd ((A +- CST1) +- CST2): Punt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 14 19:11:21 2018
New Revision: 261607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261607&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/86122
* match.pd ((A +- CST1) +- CST2): Punt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 14 19:16:14 2018
New Revision: 261608
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261608&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86048
* gcc.target/i386/pr86048.c: Require sse2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 14 19:16:52 2018
New Revision: 261609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261609&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86048
* gcc.target/i386/pr86048.c: Require sse2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86155
--- Comment #2 from RJE ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> It works for me with a mingw-w64 build from GCC trunk, and running under
> WINE.
I get stage2 bootstrap errors when building official-gcc-trunk-e8005cb.tar.gz
on my wind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86156
Bug ID: 86156
Summary: ffmpeg clean clone fails
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86156
--- Comment #1 from Dave Gress ---
add email
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86156
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86157
Bug ID: 86157
Summary: Wmisleading-indentation disabled after a #line
directive
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86063
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jun 14 21:07:14 2018
New Revision: 261613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261613&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86063
* decl2.c (cp_check_const_attributes): Ski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86063
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
--- Comment #12 from Dave Pagan ---
New test pr55976-1.c is failing due to unaccounted for extraneous output from
the compiler. Test requires addition of dg-prune-output. Adding the directive
and will send patch shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86158
Bug ID: 86158
Summary: [9 regression]
gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*i.lto-stream-out
fails starting with 261546
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Stat
nk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20180614 (experimental) [trunk revision 261591] (GCC)
$ g++-8.1 abc.c -c -O1
$ g++-trunk abc.c -c -O1
abc.c: In function ‘vec fn1()’:
abc.c:2:9: warning: AVX vector return without AVX enabled chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86160
Bug ID: 86160
Summary: Implement isinf on PowerPC
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86161
Bug ID: 86161
Summary: Add insn support for __builtin_isnormal and
__builtin_fpclassify
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57965
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
ASA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44276|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
ASA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44277|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
ASA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44278|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86141
--- Comment #16 from ASA ---
Please have a look at the new attachments (3) which demonstrate a contrast in
the heuristic determination. Acknowledging that the first method uses two
different functions and the second method uses the same function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86157
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86123
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86123
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86144
--- Comment #3 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Note a workaround would be to re-arrange the vectorizer calls to
> vectorizable_simd_clone_call and vectorizable_call. Can you check if
> the follow
96 matches
Mail list logo
