https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918
Bug ID: 85918
Summary: Conversions to/from [unsigned] long long are not
vectorized for AVX512DQ target
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85920
Bug ID: 85920
Summary: Incomplete transition to IFNs for scatter/gather
support, drop vectorize.builtin_{gather,scatter}
target hooks
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85912
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85912
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Untested fix:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-dump.c b/gcc/tree-dump.c
index bc3e3a9f433..fe3cc12bf23 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-dump.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-dump.c
@@ -683,10 +683,6 @@ dequeue_and_dump (dump_info_p di)
cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85913
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85912
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 25 09:40:38 2018
New Revision: 260744
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260744&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Richard Biener
PR c++/85912
* tree-dump.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85912
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 25 09:43:07 2018
New Revision: 260745
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260745&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Richard Biener
PR c++/85912
* tree-dump.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85912
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
Bug ID: 85921
Summary: /gcc/c-family/c-warn.c fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri May 25 10:39:35 2018
New Revision: 260748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix a test-case (PR testsuite/85911).
2018-05-25 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #2 from John Simon ---
> Can you figure out who #defines noinline?
Sure. Using -E -dD pointed to "/usr/include/linux/compiler.h" which has:
```c
/*
* From the GCC manual:
*
* Many functions do not examine any values except their
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #3 from John Simon ---
The include chain is:
# 415 "../../gcc-8.1.0/gcc/system.h"
<-- "/usr/include/signal.h"
<-- "/usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h"
<-- "/usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h"
<-- "/usr/include/linux/compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 25 May 2018, gcc at mailinator dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
>
> --- Comment #2 from John Simon ---
> > Can you figure out who #defines noinline?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85720
--- Comment #7 from bin cheng ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri May 25 11:09:42 2018
New Revision: 260753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260753&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/85720
* tree-loop-distribution.c (break_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84846
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85922
Bug ID: 85922
Summary: bootstrapping fails with -O3 because gcc 8.1.0
generates unknown instruction pshufb
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84846
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Would you be fine if we'll print cwd just in intermediate format?
> According to gcov.c:
>
> /* Output *.gcov file in intermediate format used by 'lcov'. */
>
> static int flag_intermediate_format = 0;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #6 from John Simon ---
> I doubt this warrants a change on GCC side, given that a workaround is simple.
If I understood it correctly the local "solution" would be to fix a system
header (which is often not possible because of missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
(In reply to John Simon from comment #3)
> The include chain is:
>
> # 415 "../../gcc-8.1.0/gcc/system.h"
> <-- "/usr/include/signal.h"
> <-- "/usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h"
> <-- "/usr/include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> Revision r260683 fixes the ICE for the test gcc.dg/torture/pr48044.c, but
> not for the second one in comment 0:
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85916
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #8 from John Simon ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/ doesn't say anything about make headers_install.
How/Where to do this?
If this is appropriate then it is much better than manually patching anything.
In this case I'd still suggest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85923
Bug ID: 85923
Summary: invalid code generation when incrementing pointer
referenced by pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85922
John Simon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from John Simon ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85923
--- Comment #1 from Sami Kantoluoto ---
Created attachment 44182
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44182&action=edit
stripped preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85923
--- Comment #2 from Sami Kantoluoto ---
Created attachment 44183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44183&action=edit
generated x86 asm code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85924
Bug ID: 85924
Summary: [6 Regression] ASAN: segfault in
__interceptor_clock_gettime ( because 'asan_linux.o'
for libasan.a built with -DPIC )
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85923
--- Comment #3 from Sami Kantoluoto ---
When compiled with:
$ gcc-arm-none-eabi-7-2017-q4-major/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc -v -save-temps -Wall
-Werror -Os -c skipblk.c -o skipblk.o
The following assembly is generated:
skipblk:
@ Function s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85923
--- Comment #4 from Sami Kantoluoto ---
Created attachment 44184
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44184&action=edit
generated arm asm code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805
--- Comment #4 from Sandor Zsuga ---
I tried it with the package offered by Microchip, which has avr-gcc 5.4.0, the
behavior is the same, bug is present.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or just get rid of the bogus variable.
const char *noinline = "noinline";
if (DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (newdecl)
&& DECL_UNINLINABLE (olddecl)
&& lookup_attribute (noinline, DECL_ATTRIBUTES (o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85923
--- Comment #5 from Sami Kantoluoto ---
When compiled with
$ gcc-arm-none-eabi-4_6-2012q4/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc -v -save-temps -Wall
-Werror -Os -c skipblk.c -o skipblk.o
The following assembly is generated:
skipblk:
@ Function support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67259
Miguel Ojeda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 25 May 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
>
> --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Or just get rid of the bogus variable.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85832
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 25 12:36:03 2018
New Revision: 260756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85832
* config/i386/sse.md (_eq3_1):
Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11)
> Maybe it was changed to this to make translation easier?
No other code has similar wording of a translatable message, and for
translators it is beneficial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 25 May 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85923
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does -fno-strict-aliasing fix this? I suspect the issue is the pointers types
"char*" and "unsigned char*" are considered to be different aliasing groups
(which is correct) and that is causing gcc to output c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
Bug ID: 85925
Summary: [ARM][7/8/9 Regression] Mis-compilation at -02,
masking with 257 goes wrong in combine
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85923
--- Comment #7 from Sami Kantoluoto ---
Yes, that seems to fix it:
.skipblk:
.LFB0:
movq_ctype_tab_ptr(%rip), %r8
xorl%eax, %eax
.L2:
movq(%rdi), %rdx
movq(%r8), %rsi
movzbl (%rdx), %ecx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri May 25 13:38:13 2018
New Revision: 260758
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260758&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* config/i386/sse.md (cvtusi264):
Add {q} suffix t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri May 25 13:39:55 2018
New Revision: 260759
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260759&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* config/i386/sse.md (cvtusi264):
Add {q} suffix t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85926
Bug ID: 85926
Summary: feature request: more fine-grained
Wno-ignored-attributes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri May 25 13:56:16 2018
New Revision: 260760
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260760&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83628
* config/alpha/alpha.md (ashlsi3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #7 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 44185
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44185&action=edit
Patch by checking against original buffer
This is one possible patch for this problem, it just checks if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #8 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 44186
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44186&action=edit
Patch by keeping original length
This patches the problem by storing the allocated length in a separate
varia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85842
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #9 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Looking at write.c, there are multiple places where things like the pattern:
result = select_string (dtp, f, str_buf, &res_len, kind);
...
get_float_string (dtp, f, source , kind, 0, buffer,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85901
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85278
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85924
--- Comment #1 from Jason Vas Dias ---
Aha! Sorry, it appears that when run from command line, just the -fPIC
option appears, not the -DPIC, but in my make.log for the original
GCC build, I do see:
checking for shl_load in -ldld... libtool: comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85917
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The difference between -std=gnu11 and -std=gnu17 is not meant to be
significant, since apart from the __STDC_VERSION__ change C17 is purely a
bug-fix version and so there are no other seman
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> I've added Jerry to the CC as he's probably the most familiar with
> this area of the library. Jerry, does this one-line patch look
> correct or are there deeper issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85768
--- Comment #4 from François Dumont ---
Created attachment 44187
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44187&action=edit
Remove backtrace usage during bootstrap.
I wonder if this patch could fix the bootstrap ? I try to avoid the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 25 May 2018, gcc at mailinator dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/install/ doesn't say anything about make headers_install.
That's because it's not part of installing GCC, it's p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85790
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85873
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |missed-optimization
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85768
--- Comment #5 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Fri May 25 16:40:55 2018
New Revision: 260761
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260761&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/85768
* sr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 25 16:44:55 2018
New Revision: 260762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260762&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80485 - inline function non-zero address.
* symtab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85768
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to François Dumont from comment #4)
> I wonder if this patch could fix the bootstrap ? I try to avoid the usage of
> backtrace during bootstrap. The problem will then be limited to usage of
> debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 25 May 2018, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Beyond that, #defining macros that match known attributes to something else
> seems like asking for trouble. It even came up at the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85927
Bug ID: 85927
Summary: ud2 instruction generated starting with gcc 8
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85543
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 18:04:42 2018
New Revision: 260766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85543
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85916
--- Comment #2 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis ---
A space is missing between "-fcf-protection" and "option" in this sentence:
"""
GCC now supports the Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) extension
through -fcf-protectionopti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85916
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis from comment #2)
> A space is missing between "-fcf-protection" and "option" in this sentence:
> """
> GCC now supports the Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85928
Bug ID: 85928
Summary: Misplaced references to some options in info page in
Option Index
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85779
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 18:17:35 2018
New Revision: 260767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85779
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85780
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 18:28:51 2018
New Revision: 260768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85780
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85895
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 18:40:13 2018
New Revision: 260769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260769&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85895
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85895
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 18:57:04 2018
New Revision: 260770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85895
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85780
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 19:05:52 2018
New Revision: 260771
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260771&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85780
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85712
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri May 25 19:12:16 2018
New Revision: 260772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260772&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-optimization/85712
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85779
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 19:13:50 2018
New Revision: 260773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260773&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85779
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85712
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch from c#6 corrects a problem discovered when backporting to GCC 6. With
the two patches, no regressions are seen in trunk, 8, 7, or 6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #2 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis ---
I have firstly rebuilt glibc with GCC 8.1.0 without -mfunction-return=thunk and
at that time GCC 7.3.0 and 8.1.0 were working.
Next I have rebuilt glibc with GCC 8.1.0 with -mfunction-r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #3 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis ---
If you claim that it is a bug in GCC 7.3.0, then please try to fix it in GCC
7.4.0, preferably without breaking ABI compatilibity...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85543
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 19:24:06 2018
New Revision: 260774
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85543
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis from comment #3)
> If you claim that it is a bug in GCC 7.3.0, then please try to fix it in GCC
> 7.4.0, preferably without breaking ABI compatilibity...
Please try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85543
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 19:38:11 2018
New Revision: 260775
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260775&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85543
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85929
Bug ID: 85929
Summary: _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS, subscript type mismatch, and
std::vector bounds check elimination
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85779
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 19:45:57 2018
New Revision: 260776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260776&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85779
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85780
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 25 19:54:51 2018
New Revision: 260777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260777&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85780
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
