https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
Assignee|ebotcazou at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #16 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #14)
> spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/
> /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65139
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
Kugan posted a patch for this, but it was rejected.
Kugan, would you please put a link to your patch in the comments and unassign
yourself (unless you plan to work on this further).
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 6 07:37:14 2017
New Revision: 248909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-06 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80928
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80970
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80971
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80980
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80984
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #2 from Markus Tri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SLP vectorization does not |SLP vectorization does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is indeed that we change side-band info on "leaders" to sth
optimistic later proved wrong during iteration but we do not undo this setting
(the lattice changes are not undone later but it is exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Fuka ---
Still present in GCC 7 and people are complaining
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44385909/adding-to-an-array-of-characters-in-fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
With --param max-combine-insns=2 compile-time and memory use at -O1 shrinks
considerably for me (still too high IMHO).
-O1 --param max-combine-insns=2: 70.48user 0.63system 1:11.12elapsed 99%CPU
(0avgtext+0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80985
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Consider:
template
int call (Func f)
{
static int counter;
f ();
return ++counter;
}
void func () noexcept
{
}
Now if call(func) is evaluated in two different translation units, one using
C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Without --param max-combine-insns=2
alias stmt walking : 10.98 ( 7%) usr 0.13 (12%) sys 11.14 ( 7%) wall
3 kB ( 0%) ggc
dead store elim2: 9.57 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 9.57 (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
HJ's tester sees the same ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2017-06/msg00057.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80985
--- Comment #2 from John Lindgren ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> template
> int call (Func f)
> {
> static int counter;
> f ();
> return ++counter;
> }
Yes, this is a different example in which the warning does m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Jun 6 11:30:54 2017
New Revision: 248915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/80978
* tree-cfg.c (execute_fixup_cfg): Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80985
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebpop at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Indeed
Index: gcc/domwalk.c
===
--- gcc/domwalk.c (revision 248914)
+++ gcc/domwalk.c (working copy)
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ dom_walk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 6 12:46:41 2017
New Revision: 248919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248919&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-06 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80974
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
Denis Khalikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40963|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt ---
That is the usual approach, and there are already some predicates involving
alignment. It's a matter of going through and figuring out which ones will do
what's needed. I spent some tiresome weeks working t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58861
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Fuka ---
Still present in GCC 7.1.1.
Cab bug70231 be related?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80987
Bug ID: 80987
Summary: Existence of a std::initializer_list constructor
breaks deduction guides
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
Bug ID: 80988
Summary: [8 Regression] 171_swim fails
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80989
Bug ID: 80989
Summary: Incorrect .loc directives in generated assembly code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jun 6 15:06:56 2017
New Revision: 248922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80979
* name-lookup.c (adl_class_only): Don't add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80987
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
Bug ID: 80990
Summary: cv-qualifiers ignored in variable definition using
class template argument deduction
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69502
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65672
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80991
Bug ID: 80991
Summary: ICE with __is_trivially_constructible in template
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80023
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
--- Comment #2 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davem
Date: Tue Jun 6 17:02:22 2017
New Revision: 248926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
sparc: Fix stack references in return delay slot.
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
FWIW using -fconcepts and const container doesn't lose the qualifiers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Testing this patch:
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -25367,7 +25367,7 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
int flags,
--cp_unevaluated_operand;
release_tree_vector (args);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79983
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jun 6 17:40:34 2017
New Revision: 248927
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248927&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/79983
* c-decl.c (start_struct): Use the location
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79983
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
--- Comment #3 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davem
Date: Tue Jun 6 18:42:52 2017
New Revision: 248929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
sparc: Fix stack references in return delay slot.
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
--- Comment #4 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davem
Date: Tue Jun 6 18:52:22 2017
New Revision: 248930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/80968
* config/sparc/sparc.c (sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
--- Comment #5 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davem
Date: Tue Jun 6 18:54:55 2017
New Revision: 248931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248931&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
sparc: Fix stack references in return delay slot.
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 41481
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41481&action=edit
Patch candidate
I'm attaching patch that supports following expansion of -fprofile-dir (or
arguments of -fprofi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jun 6 19:18:37 2017
New Revision: 248932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/80975
* m4/matmu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #2)
> Try compiling with -fno-frontend-optimize to confirm.
... and if this fixes the problem (assuming it is in foo.f90),
do the following:
$ gfortran -c -fno-fronte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jun 6 22:23:07 2017
New Revision: 248935
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248935&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-06 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80718
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Jun 6 22:27:13 2017
New Revision: 248936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248936&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Back port from mainline
[gcc]
2017-05-19 Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80992
Bug ID: 80992
Summary: libstdc++ cross-build on solaris is missing
GCC_CHECK_TLS
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80987
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the problem is here in do_class_deduction in gcc/cp/pt.c:
vec *args;
if (init == NULL_TREE
|| TREE_CODE (init) == TREE_LIST)
args = make_tree_vector_from_list (init);
else if (BRACE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80986
--- Comment #1 from linzj ---
>From the peek of -fdump-tree-tu-all, the translation unit already get the
function_type wrong. Before use the auto, the function type has the attribute
pcs. But after the auto use, the function type has dropped the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80993
Bug ID: 80993
Summary: [msp430] __attribute__((interrupt)) should imply
__attribute__((used))
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80994
Bug ID: 80994
Summary: Misleading error message for missing template keyword
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
74 matches
Mail list logo
