https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80980
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-06-06
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|unknown |8.0
Summary|-Os generates larger code |-Os generates larger code
|than -O1 because loop is |than -O1 because loop
|not removed |header copying is not
| |performend and thus loop is
| |not removed
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is loop header copying not being run on this loop -Os and thus niter
analysis "failing" and ivcanon not removing the loop.
The reason is that inside main() this loop is predicted cold and thus
if (optimize_loop_for_size_p (loop))
{
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
fprintf (dump_file,
" Not duplicating bb %i: optimizing for size.\n",
header->index);
return false;
}
triggers.
I suppose instead factoring the above into the duplication size estimation
cap instead would "fix" this particular case.