https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #9 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Tavian Barnes from comment #7)
> But this condition is not met:
>
>> - They are changed between the setjmp() invocation and longjmp() call.
I think it is - __cancel_arg is assigned inside a while
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
Bug ID: 80100
Summary: simplify-rtx.c sanitizer detects undefined behaviour
with optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80101
Bug ID: 80101
Summary: ICE in store_data_bypass_p, at recog.c:3737
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80102
Bug ID: 80102
Summary: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2330
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80103
Bug ID: 80103
Summary: ICE in output_1144, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:2298
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79859
Frederic Marchal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fmarchal at perso dot be
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80104
Bug ID: 80104
Summary: ICE in initialize_argument_information, at
calls.c:1748
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50542
--- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still present in 7.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105
Bug ID: 80105
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE in outer_projection_mupa, at
graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1019
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50538
--- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still in 7.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80106
Bug ID: 80106
Summary: ICE on an invalid code in tree_to_uhwi, at
tree.c:7344
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50406
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
With 7.0.1 20170318 compiles links and executes correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79859
--- Comment #3 from Frederic Marchal ---
My mistake, I simply removed the superfluous single quotes in the translated
message. Problem solved with the translation.
The original message is still doubly quoted in English though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80107
Bug ID: 80107
Summary: ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2964
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #24 from Vittorio Zecca ---
It works on my x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with gfortran 7.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108
Bug ID: 80108
Summary: ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79859
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
When the original is changed, the translated strings will need to be
redone. Thus, it is always better to change the original first. This change
counts as obvious, you don't need approval or copyright a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80109
Bug ID: 80109
Summary: ICE in get_range_info, at tree-ssanames.c:375
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
--- Comment #12 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I am still having an ICE as in comment 11.
Opening a new bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68045
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80110
Bug ID: 80110
Summary: [6/7 Regression] error: statement marked for throw,
but doesn’t w/ -fsanitize=thread
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |5.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80091
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org|prakhar.bahuguna at a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80111
Bug ID: 80111
Summary: #include kills compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80093
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80111
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This usually means the gmp or mpfr library you are using is compiled not for
the machine you are using and compiled for a new processor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80111
--- Comment #2 from Graeme Winter ---
Ah OK, thank you - I am using a GCC compiled by $SOMEONE_ELSE so this could
very well be the case...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80112
Bug ID: 80112
Summary: ICE in doloop_condition_get at loop-doloop.c:158
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80095
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80113
Bug ID: 80113
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE in set_var_live_on_entry at
tree-ssa-live.c:1018
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-vali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||69728
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80112
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78857
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Mar 20 09:33:11 2017
New Revision: 246274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: PR78857: Don't use load and test if result is live.
The FP loa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
OK, I've got a new test-case that fails with ILS 0.18:
$ cat /tmp/tmpunyat_pa.i
int *a;
int b[];
int c;
void d ()
{
double e[2][3] = {0.0, 0.0, 1.0};
for (int f = 0; f < 2; ++f)
for (int g = 0; g < 6;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78857
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80111
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79747
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> I don't see -malign-functions in the latest manual. -falign-functions is
> documented with an optional equals at the end.
>
> $ (cd /src/gcc/trunk && grep align-f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80110
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79811
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80081
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79769
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Mar 20 10:04:06 2017
New Revision: 246275
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix *_CST ICEs connected to MPX.
2017-03-20 Martin Liska
PR t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79770
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Mar 20 10:04:06 2017
New Revision: 246275
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix *_CST ICEs connected to MPX.
2017-03-20 Martin Liska
PR t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79770
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79769
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2017-03-01 00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79753
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Mar 20 10:06:00 2017
New Revision: 246276
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246276&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
MPX: fix PR middle-end/79753
2017-03-20 Martin Liska
PR middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79753
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79811
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80109
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80104
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80114
Bug ID: 80114
Summary: asan-stack=1 with -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope
and stack arrays multiplies code size
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67338
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80097
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41002
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41002&action=edit
gcc7-pr80097.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80115
Bug ID: 80115
Summary: [7 Regression] OpenJDK 1.8 fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80115
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 41003
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41003&action=edit
unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80115
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28561
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80114
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I see, with -O2 and your options:
main:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movl$1, -4(%rsp)
movslq -4(%rsp), %rax
movl._1(,%rax,4), %eax
ret
which is the same as without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Sadly I could not come up with a minimal testcase so far. What I can see from
the code is that tree code hoisting increases the live range of some values
which then translates into more spilling in reloa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
>
> --- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
> Sadly I could not come up with a mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80115
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80010
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80114
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80095
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80095
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
commit 39786c804b3d3927f800bf8834ad849138d06136
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 12 03:48:55 2014 +
PR c++/57510
* typeck2.c (split_nonconstant_init_1): Handle arrays here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80096
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80096
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
commit b1363399fad470a536bd8731be39c3fbfe4e6fad
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 9 20:02:50 2016 +
Implement P0127R2, Declaring non-type parameters with auto.
gcc/cp/
* cp-tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80096
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|[c++1z] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80096
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
G++ 6:
w.C:1:10: error: ‘auto’ parameter not permitted in this context
template struct A
^~~~
w.C:6:4: note: invalid template non-type parameter
A<0> a;
^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80094
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Brad Spengler from comment #2)
> I've added an alternative fix at
> https://grsecurity.net/~spender/plugin_hash_fix2.diff
>
> It's a bit smaller/cleaner and should fit in better with the existi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Guess we should
--- a/gcc/asan.c
+++ b/gcc/asan.c
@@ -2566,11 +2566,12 @@ initialize_sanitizer_builtins (void)
#undef DEF_BUILTIN_STUB
#define DEF_BUILTIN_STUB(ENUM, NAME)
#undef DEF_SANITIZER_BUILTIN
-#de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80114
--- Comment #3 from Jani Nikula ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Well, just adding the param and -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope does not
> enable any sanitization. One has to add -fsanitize=address to trigger real
> sanitizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80113
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 20 13:06:58 2017
New Revision: 246277
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246277&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80113
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80115
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
This is from systemtap 3.0, didn't try with 3.1 which seems to be available
since a few weeks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Please reformat it properly:
#define DEF_SANITIZER_BUILTIN(ENUM, NAME, TYPE, ATTRS) \
do { \
decl = add_builtin_function ("__builtin_" NAME,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As for the warning, we should open an enhancement request, though not sure it
is something for -Wmisleading-indentation. I'd say that we just should warn
whenever a macro defines several statements and the m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78158
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Also reported on stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37552866/why-does-threadsanitizer-report-a-race-with-this-lock-free-example
I've checked with
gcc version 7.0.1 20170307 (experimental) (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Mar 20 13:31:28 2017
New Revision: 246278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80063
* asan.c (DEF_SANITIZER_BUILTIN): Us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80116
Bug ID: 80116
Summary: Warn about macros expanding to multiple statements
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
I created PR80116 to track the warning addition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79893
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
*** Bug 80106 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
Bug ID: 80117
Summary: [7 regression] a-cfinve.ads:245:04: warning: types for
unchecked conversion have different sizes
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80106
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80118
Bug ID: 80118
Summary: ICE with zero size parameter array
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80119
Bug ID: 80119
Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized wrongly flags the body of a
short-circuited if-clause
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80119
--- Comment #1 from Julian Pfeifle ---
The error occurs with -O0 and -O3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
Bug ID: 80120
Summary: Incorrect error with associate construct and character
array (regression)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80059
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122
Bug ID: 80122
Summary: __builtin_va_arg_pack() and
__builtin_va_arg_pack_len() does not work correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121
Bug ID: 80121
Summary: Memory leak when allocating a component derived type
in a recursive subroutine (gfortran)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80059
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Mar 20 15:02:09 2017
New Revision: 246279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246279&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80059 - ICE with noexcept and __transaction_atomic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80109
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
But also ICEs on x86_64. Started with:
commit da6cf191f748d879f8be3c00d745b3bfe6e5495b
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Oct 18 21:40:58 2016 +
* Makefile.in (OBJS): Add gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.o.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80109
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
