https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58597
--- Comment #4 from Volker Reichelt ---
The ICE disappered on the 4.9 branch in GCC 4.9.2.
But the testcase still crashes trunk with a different stack trace:
bug.cc:6:12: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
A a = 0;
^
0xcdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64591
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64589
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
1653 int old_hints_est = estimate_edge_hints (edge);
old_hints_est = 288
estimate_edge_hints (edge) = 32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
1660 gcc_assert (old_hints_est == estimate_edge_hints (edge));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hmm, that is same_scc hint. It would be great to have smaller testcase. I will
look into that tomorrow morning.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64591
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64591
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62044
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64493
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 14 08:32:18 2015
New Revision: 219579
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219579&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/64493
PR tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64495
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 14 08:32:18 2015
New Revision: 219579
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219579&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/64493
PR tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Donn Seeley from comment #13)
> BTW, this issue cropped up in Wind River Linux testing, not VxWorks. I have
> no idea whether the VxWorks folks are using -mapcs-frame. WR Linux will
> r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
Bug ID: 64595
Summary: cgo installed into wrong directory
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64391
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 14 08:43:53 2015
New Revision: 219581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219581&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64391
* trans-mem.c (get_attrs_for): Return NULL_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64391
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64592
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I can reproduce it even with r219580.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> I can reproduce it even with r219580.
Likewise. People, remember to use -O3 when reproducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64365
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
According to http://golang.org/cmd/cgo/ cgo isn't supposed to be called
directly, but only via go tool cgo. But the version suffix will probably break
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
>
> --- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen
> ---
> (In reply to Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #8)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #7)
> > I guess the testcase is flaky.
> > I've posted the patch to fix the ICE and the reasoning behind it at
> >
However, this is
tedious with real code.
Tested with 4.9.1 and 5.0 (20141222), both give the same errors:
g++ -std=c++11 -Wall 20150114-friend.cpp
20150114-friend.cpp:81:8: error: template parameters not deducible in partial
specialization:
struct Glue, int> // error: template pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64596
--- Comment #1 from petschy at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 3
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3&action=edit
code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Jan 14 10:14:23 2015
New Revision: 219583
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219583&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR target/64460: Set 'shift' attr properly on s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Joel, can you try trunk after this commit to confirm that it fixes the ICE on
your end and close this off if ok?
Thanks,
Kyrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Thanks for the input on VxWorks, we'll draft something up about deprecating
> this option.
Note that the system compiler uses APCS frames and DWARF2 EH on VxWorks 6,
which is the mainstream version as of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64583
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Symbol diff gcc-2015-01-10 vs. trunk:
@@ -26,12 +26,11 @@
U _ZN3WTF6String6appendEt
U _ZN3WTF6StringC1EPKtj
W
_ZN3WTF6VectorINS_6OwnPtrIN5blink20Gr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
--- Comment #41 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Wed Jan 14 10:22:48 2015
New Revision: 219584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219584&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-01-14 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r218451.
2014-12-06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64583
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 34445
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34445&action=edit
unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64307
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, we SLP the first block
node
stmt 0 b[_17] = _24;
stmt 1 b[_3] = _50;
stmt 2 b[_93] = _99;
stmt 3 b[_104] = _110;
node
stmt 0 _24 = (unsigned char) _23;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I can confirm these now. Executing 'make -k check' in
> /sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-
> darwin14.1.0/i386/libffi doesn't cause -m32 to be passed to the test suite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61413
--- Comment #4 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Jan 14 11:02:24 2015
New Revision: 219587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM]Fix definition of __ARM_SIZEOF_WCHAR_T.
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61413
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64415
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 14 11:06:18 2015
New Revision: 219588
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219588&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Richard Biener
PR lto/64415
* tree-inline.c (ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64588
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64587
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
*** Bug 64588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you for testing, there's patch I've just sent to gcc-patches ML:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg01008.html.
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64541
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453
--- Comment #1 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Jan 14 11:51:40 2015
New Revision: 219592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Thomas Preud'homme
gcc/
PR target/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64541
--- Comment #2 from Ulya ---
> we have to assume that p == q and thus the store to *q invalidates the
> previously load *p
I see.
It seemed to me from GIMPLE dumps that both cases are equally easy to optimize,
perhaps I'm missing something.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64541
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, skvadrik at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64541
>
> --- Comment #2 from Ulya ---
> > we have to assume that p == q and thus the store t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64541
--- Comment #4 from Ulya ---
Ah! Now I see the problem, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64365
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
extern void abort (void);
extern int memcmp (const void * , const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__);
void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
foo(int *in)
{
for (int i = 14; i >= 10; i--) {
in[i - 8] -= in[i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64365
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
Javier V. Gómez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jota.uve at hotmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57518
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64577
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64365
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64365
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.9.2 |4.8.3
Summary|[5 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Javier V. Gómez from comment #2)
> I found another case that worked in G++ 4.8.3 but fails in 4.9:
This example is complete nonsense. Why is it split across three files? Why
doesn't main.cpp i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
--- Comment #4 from Javier V. Gómez ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to Javier V. Gómez from comment #2)
> > I found another case that worked in G++ 4.8.3 but fails in 4.9:
>
> This example is complete nonsense. Why
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=902
--- Comment #12 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Wed Jan 14 12:53:04 2015
New Revision: 219597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219597&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Yvan Roux
Fix Linaro PR #902
Partial Backport from trun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64583
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
For example:
_ZN3WTF6VectorIPN5blink9PopupItemELm0ENS_16DefaultAllocatorEE15reserveCapacityEm/24866
(void WTF::Vector::reserveCapacity(size_t) [with
T = blink::PopupItem*; long unsigned int inlineCapac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Right, cgo is not run directly. It is run by the go tool. It is in effect an
internal program like cc1.
The version suffix should be fine if libexecsubdir in libgo matches
libexecsubdir in gotools, as t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64365
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
ICK. Data-ref analysis issue with respect to how we handle pointer IVs
in dr_analyze_indices. This results in
(compute_affine_dependence
stmt_a: MEM[(int *)vectp_in.21_137] = vect__12.23_139;
stmt_b:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, ian at airs dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
>
> --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> Right, cgo is not run directly. It is run by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64387
--- Comment #3 from tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tocarip
Date: Wed Jan 14 13:45:49 2015
New Revision: 219598
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219598&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64387
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_unpacks_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64393
--- Comment #3 from tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tocarip
Date: Wed Jan 14 13:49:58 2015
New Revision: 219599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64393
gcc/
* common/config/i386/i386-common.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64386
--- Comment #3 from tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tocarip
Date: Wed Jan 14 13:55:06 2015
New Revision: 219600
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219600&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64386
gcc/
PR target/64386
* config/i386/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Macleod ---
Author: amacleod
Date: Wed Jan 14 13:58:35 2015
New Revision: 219601
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219601&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Andrew MacLeod
PR middle-end/59448
* builtins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 14 14:06:07 2015
New Revision: 219603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219603&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59354
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64597
Bug ID: 64597
Summary: ICE when optimizing with AutoFDO annotation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64515
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24161
Cameron changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cameron314 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64509
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24161
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
EDG gives the same error as GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
To invoke cgo, put this code in a file foo.go and type "go run foo.go" (or "go
build foo.go && ./foo").
package main
// #include
// void cprintln(const char *s) { puts(s); }
import "C"
func main() {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64353
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Note the testcase is bogus because xx is clearly loading from global memory and
thus should be pure only.
Of course we should still not ICE here and treat xx as if it were const.
One possibility is to simp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
ISTR that preloading pid_t was necessary for ada (basically all types required
from some builtins are required to be preloaded).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64353
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Right, wrong const attribute causes no VUSE for calls to the function which
leads to # VUSE <.MEM> generated for added loads and requires SSA update.
We may actually call update_ssa only in case of missing V
ng shows my
compiler version and compiling the original test case.
Thanks.
$ arm-rtems4.11-gcc --version
arm-rtems4.11-gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150114 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64498
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Should be fixed now.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 64415 ***
I can confirm that it works for me.
Thanks,
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
--- Comment #6 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is still a lot to do. I have patches in progress for Aarch64 loads and
stores. Aarch64 shifts still need doing, and everything for ARM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64592
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
> accumulate-outgoing-args default setting change?
Nope, 4.9 already had -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args with -Os.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Curious it happens only with FDO... I am looking into that now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62066
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64592
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
With help of Jakub we managed to figure out that on my setup it is because GCC
5.0 defaults to no .cfi directives, while GCC 4.9 uses them.
This seems to be because cfi working advance test, but we do not see h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64350
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
Bug ID: 64598
Summary: var-tracking.c has internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #1 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
Hi,
I am trying to create cross compiler by using gcc-4.9.1.
During the procdure, I got this error:
/crosstool-ng-1.20.0/.build/src/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/var-tracking.c:5824:1: internal
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #2 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
Created attachment 34447
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34447&action=edit
Screen shot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
What options are you using to configure GCC? What target are you trying to
compile for? What version of GCC are you starting with?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
