https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Shouldn't you cache the result of count_num_stmt in some SSA_NAME_VERSION > indexed vector? Otherwise it can be expensive on pathological testcases. > And with the caching I'd hope it should be cheap enough that you could do that > even outside of loops. Yes, see my patch review
