http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60378
Bug ID: 60378
Summary: ICE on attempt to print null of derived type with
unlimited polymorphic component
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56438
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56438
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Sorry, wrong bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60379
Bug ID: 60379
Summary: [4.9 Regression] pugixml build failure caused by
r207001
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60071
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Mar 1 13:16:37 2014
New Revision: 208242
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208242&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60071
* config/sh/sh.md (*mov_t_msb_neg): Split into ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60370
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60378
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Mar 1 14:14:25 2014
New Revision: 208243
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208243&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58845
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Sorry on vector&&vect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60071
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60111
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
In gen_ashift the assert
gcc_assert (satisfies_constraint_P27 (n_rtx));
fires, which means that the requested shift amount is not 1, 2, 8 or 16.
In gen_shifty_hi_op the function gen_ashift is invoked with th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60380
Bug ID: 60380
Summary: [C++11] ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage with -g and
template instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
--- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> > (v1 != { 0, 0, ... }) & (v2 != { 0, 0, ... })
>
> FWIW this seems to be what clang does, without any kind of seq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60380
--- Comment #1 from Bauke Conijn ---
Created attachment 32238
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32238&action=edit
Compiler output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60380
--- Comment #2 from Bauke Conijn ---
Bug 53756 is possibly related.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60370
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #15 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
I agree. My examples are working.
Unfortunately, my account seems to not have the permissions to close a bug. I
am a maintainer.
Any ideas how I can get such permissions set?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #16 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
Sorry for the noise. I reported a dupe not this bug.
My question on permissions still stands though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Ed Smith-Rowland from comment #15)
> Unfortunately, my account seems to not have the permissions to close a bug.
> I am a maintainer.
>
> Any ideas how I can get such permissions set?
You need t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60378
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60370
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
--- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Mar 1 18:44:25 2014
New Revision: 208246
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208246&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58845
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Sorry on vector&&vect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60182
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Mar 1 18:43:30 2014
New Revision: 208245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60182
* pt.c (unify): Ignore alias templates when deducing a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60146
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Mar 1 18:43:24 2014
New Revision: 208244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60146
* pt.c (tsubst_omp_for_iterator): Don't let substitutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |rejects-valid
Priority|P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
--- Comment #49 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #48)
> I've been experimenting with this (although updated to more recent GCC), and
> one issue I see, functionality-wise, is what happens when an extern "C"
> function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60182
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60146
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60379
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60370
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin ---
Created attachment 32239
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32239&action=edit
Tentative patch moving realloc code before bound checking
This patch doesn't work, so it may not be a code orderin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60379
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Mar 1 19:40:33 2014
New Revision: 208247
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208247&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60379
* semantics.c (begin_maybe_infinite_loop): Use
fold
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60378
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60379
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill ---
Sounds good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Mar 1 21:14:54 2014
New Revision: 208249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/60341
* frontend-passes.c (optimize_com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
Bug ID: 60381
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at
var-tracking.c:8245
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60377
--- Comment #1 from Adam Butcher ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Sat Mar 1 21:28:18 2014
New Revision: 208250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/60377.
PR c++/60377
* parser.c (cp_parser_parameter_de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/libgcc/../../gcc/cc1
-fpreprocessed libgcc2.i -quiet -dumpbase libgcc2.c -auxbase-strip _divdc3.o -g
-g -g -O2 -O2 -O2 -Wextra -Wall -Wwri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58567
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.8.3
--- Comment #6 from Volker Reiche
-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20140301 (experimental) [trunk revision 208241] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.8.2 -O3 small.c; a.out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60383
Bug ID: 60383
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid template
specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60383
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.0, 4.6.0, 4.7.0, 4.8.0
Target Mil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58897
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Untested, but this shows what the 128/64 division could look like (with obvious
variants for mod and divmod). I don't really know how to get gcc to generate
anything like that though. I have seen udivmodtidi3 in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53492
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Last reconfirmed|2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #20 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Sat Mar 1 22:51:25 2014
New Revision: 208251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-01 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60384
Bug ID: 60384
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE with invalid typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Seve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60384
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have reviewed and tested the patch from comment #7 on x86-64 with -m32 and
-m64 and I think its ready. Dominique mentioned to possibly add a volatile. I
have not tested on the other platforms.
I can commit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60385
Bug ID: 60385
Summary: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60306
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, this is what I am testing for mainline now:
Index: ipa-prop.c
===
--- ipa-prop.c (revision 208247)
+++ ipa-prop.c (working copy)
@@ -572,7 +5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58721
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #16)
> Request for assistance/comment patch for gfortran:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01034.html
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #17)
> Create
57 matches
Mail list logo
