http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (v1 != { 0, 0, ... }) & (v2 != { 0, 0, ... })
FWIW this seems to be what clang does, without any kind of sequence point.
I'm not sure why fixing this would need to wait for stage 1; it looks to me
like your patch shouldn't affect the behavior of anything that currently works.
I suppose figuring out what semantics we want is the important part.
I'm going to go ahead and fix the ICE to get the regression out of the way.
