http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384
>
> --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 8 08:59:29 2014
New Revision: 206420
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206420&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/59471
* gimplify.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59717
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59630
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 8 09:06:27 2014
New Revision: 206421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/59630
* gimple.h (is_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49718
Laurent Aflonsi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laurent.alfonsi at st dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9 regression] conftest.c |[4.9 regression] BImode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 8 10:01:29 2014
New Revision: 206422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206422&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/59649
* stor-layout.c (get_mode_bounds): For BI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59667
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 8 10:06:09 2014
New Revision: 206423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206423&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/59667
* ubsan.c (ubsan_type_descriptor): Call strip_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59667
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
It's still not fixed on the 4.7 branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59697
--- Comment #1 from Øystein Schønning-Johansen ---
Follow up:
I try the same code on a RedHat 6.5 64bit workstation with GCC4.4.
st-lx794988(ojohans) -/ojohans 37> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../conf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|58956 |
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59613
Bug 59613 depends on bug 59649, which changed state.
Bug 59649 Summary: [4.9 regression] BImode miscompiled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649
What|Removed |Added
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #11 from klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com ---
Finally figured out how to make it work. I guess this is what the class(*) is
useful for. Using class(*) I can simply overload Func and its resolution
becomes dynamic. I consider the class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The test passes with -fno-tree-tail-merge. But I don't see anything wrong with
the transformation (merging of empty blocks) done by the pass.
AFAICT, the problem is introduced by pass_dominator. te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to klaas_giesbertz from comment #11)
> Finally figured out how to make it work. I guess this is what the class(*)
> is useful for. Using class(*) I can simply overload Func and its resolut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59602
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59718
Bug ID: 59718
Summary: Behaviour of -mcpu documented incorrectly for ARM
targets
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #13 from klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com ---
You are right! Thanks a lot.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59718
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm, aarch64
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
int f(int n)
{
struct S {
int a[n];
};
struct S g(void)
{
struct S s;
s.a[0] = 0;
return s;
}
return g ().a[0];
}
I believe this isn't fixable with the GIMPLE IL as-is - without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59398
--- Comment #8 from Sergio Losilla ---
> Steve argues that it does not say whether its actual bounds are a
> characteristic. If you assume that only the shape matters, then
> the gfortran behavior is not a bug. I think it is up to the experts
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59719
Bug ID: 59719
Summary: Too much space allocated to unions containing variable
length arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I believe this isn't fixable with the GIMPLE IL as-is - without lowering
> to the fact that g () returns by storing to a return slot. Not sure why
> 3.4 ICEd (2.95.2 also ICEs btw ...).
Because historicall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer ---
Created attachment 31772
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31772&action=edit
pr59711.adb
Here's the same thing in Ada (where it actually works—it's actually fairly
idiomatic code, I believe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59669
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59719
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Related to / dup of PR28865 and PR57180 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
Bug ID: 59720
Summary: Re: f2003/f2008, class/extends, multiple gemeric
assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
virtual SSA form is broken, we have overlapping life-ranges - a virtual PHI
node is missing in bb 6, seems to be broken by store sinking (-fno-tree-sink
fixes it). The virtual SSA form updating is too simple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> That's only optimizable after the 'mergephi' pass. Before the
> temporary setting is shared by the n==m code. Thus maybe
> 'mergephi' itself can handle this ...
Yep, mergephi seems like resonable place (at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59721
Bug ID: 59721
Summary: [4.8 Regression] std::bind nested more than one level
results in infinite template substitution
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
Bug ID: 59722
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure on
i686-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Well, it should pass and check folded_casts to analyze_scalar_evolution_in_loop
and not do anything if that is set to true and the type is
TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (see simple_iv).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
--- Comment #8 from Rafał Rawicki ---
I'm hurt by this bug too. Is there a chance of porting the fix to 4.8.3
release?
I see that simple cherry-picking this patch onto 4.8 line is not possible,
because 4.8 and 4.9 branches diverged too much.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 31774
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31774&action=edit
untested patch
Like with the attached patch which performs edge-insertion. But it doesn't
work that way because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > That's only optimizable after the 'mergephi' pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> I still think this is not the correct definition of regression, I believe
> regression is regressing against released compiler version. If somebody
> commits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 31775
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31775&action=edit
alternative patch
Alternative patch splitting critical edges again. I'm going to test that, it
fixes optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Bug ID: 59723
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_tree, at
lto-streamer-out.c:1390 when compiling some Fortran
tests with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafal at rawicki dot org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59721
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
*R.4 = pr59711.f (); [return slot optimization]
ah, so we don't require a WITH_SIZE_EXPR on a RSO call. Obviously. So it
should be fixable either by the gimplifier or by the frontends (as Ada
does it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59610
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jan 8 15:06:22 2014
New Revision: 206428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206428&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/59610
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_comput
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Waiting for "some" testcase.
gfortran.dg/namelist_64.f90
(see comment 0), but you can pick most of gfortran.dg/namelist_*.f90 it you
prefer:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/namelist_11.f -O0 (internal compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31776
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31776&action=edit
gcc49-pr59722.patch
Untested fix (including reduced testcase).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58182
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Jan 8 15:25:22 2014
New Revision: 206429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206429&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Janus Weil
PR fortran/58182
* resolve.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58182
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59610
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jan 8 15:32:50 2014
New Revision: 206430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206430&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/59610
testsuite/
* gcc.dg/ipa/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59610
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59669
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 8 15:37:35 2014
New Revision: 206431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206431&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59669
* omp-low.c (simd_clone_adjust): Don't crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59669
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.niebler at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59360
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
Bug ID: 59724
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE : in rtl_verify_bb_layout, at
cfgrtl.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||alpha-linux-gnu
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59725
Bug ID: 59725
Summary: [4.9 Regression ARM,AArch64] r206148 (PR
tree-optimization/59544) caused regressions in pr52943
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #2)
> It is fixed by this simple patch:
The patch fails on typebound_operator_14.f90 in the testsuite, which is very
similar to the test case here and comes from PR 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59726
Bug ID: 59726
Summary: [4.9 Regression AArch64_be] r206148 (PR
tree-optimization/59544) causes ICE at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31777
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31777&action=edit
gcc49-pr59387.patch
So like this? I'll bootstrap/regtest it with additional logging to see how
often we refuse t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64_be |aarch64_be-*-*
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> I will re-check the Fortran standard on this issue ...
The relevant section in the F08 standard is 12.4.3.4.5, which says:
"Two dummy arguments are distinguish
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In our case here, the two corresponding arguments are polymorphic, with the
type of the second one being an extension of the type of the first.
Therefore the second one is type-compatible with the f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Fe produces:
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x76ede690 precision
32 min max
pointer_to_this >
side-effects
arg 0
unit size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #52 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Jan 8 17:25:38 2014
New Revision: 206437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Bernd Edlinger
PR middle-end/57748
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
The patch seems to work and it seems to give correct answers for various cases
of multiple inheritance I can think of. I would welcome testing on the
original sources and if it looks fine, I will go ahead with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585
--- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #17)
> The patch seems to work and it seems to give correct answers for various
> cases of multiple inheritance I can think of. I would welcome testing on
> the or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31778
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31778&action=edit
gcc49-pr59724.patch
Ugh, what a mess. So, while ifcvt wants flow_find_head_matching_sequence to
count only activ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
Bug ID: 59727
Summary: reading from character string returns end of file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
this patch solves the testcase.
The first hunk gets rid of the redundant NOP_EXPR converting TRUTH_EXPR from
INT to BOOL. The second improves gimplifier to not introduce unnecesary
control flow.
If this ap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59728
Bug ID: 59728
Summary: gcc.target/mips/octeon-baddu-1.c is failing (finds 3
double adds instead of 4)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 8 18:41:22 2014
New Revision: 206438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/59722
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_analyze_params_uses): Ignore uses in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
To add to this discussion, here are two examples from the F08 standard (section
C.9.6):
module fruits
type :: fruit
end type
type, extends(fruit) :: apple
end type
type, extends(fruit)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59729
Bug ID: 59729
Summary: C++11 allows type definitions in conditions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59614
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 8 18:48:31 2014
New Revision: 206439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59614
* class.c (abi_tag_data): Add tags field.
(check_ab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59614
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59728
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59728
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
