http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|58956 |
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I still think this is not the correct definition of regression, I believe
regression is regressing against released compiler version. If somebody
commits a wrong change that magically fixes something and has to be reverted
the next day, the magically fixed issue doesn't all of sudden become a
regression because of that. Not to mention that Richard's change has not been
a fix for that, just unrelated change that made the problem in the cris port
latent.
