[Bug c++/56886] [4.9 regression] undesirable instantiation of class template default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56886 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56883] error openmp parallel for order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- C

[Bug c++/56883] error openmp parallel for order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c/56890] New: Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 Bug #: 56890 Summary: Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/56890] Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung 2013-04-09 08:38:02 UTC --- Created attachment 29836 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29836 Slightly bigger test case with additional error for -O1

[Bug c/56890] Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung 2013-04-09 08:40:40 UTC --- Created attachment 29837 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29837 Assembler file, problem in line 29 (fdtox %f8, %f9)

[Bug lto/56891] New: Bad static analysis on fread() gives spurious warning on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56891 Bug #: 56891 Summary: Bad static analysis on fread() gives spurious warning on valid code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: U

[Bug target/56890] Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Jung 2013-04-09 08:55:25 UTC --- Forgot to post my configure line for gcc: ../gcc-4.7.2/configure --prefix=/opt/build/tools/gcc-4.7.2 --with-local-prefix=/opt/build/tools/gcc-4.7.2 --with-mpfr=/opt/build/tool

[Bug c++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a polymorphic type gives compilation error messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug middle-end/56883] error openmp parallel for order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|c++

[Bug middle-end/56883] error openmp parallel for order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-09 09:25:20 UTC --- Created attachment 29839 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29839 gcc49-pr56883.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c/56882] ICE: when compiling gegl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56882 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a polymorphic type gives compilation error messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler 2013-04-09 09:36:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) In addition I would like to remark that the precise declaration state of the inherited initializer-list constructor in vector_stack is unclear, because of h

[Bug other/56881] Miscompilation (optimisation failure?) causing NULL dereference and segfault at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56881 Chung-Ju Wu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-04-09 09:59:20 UTC --- Started with Richard Biener's http://gcc.gnu.org/r188261 aka PR53081 fix, which added or improved memcpy recognition. I'm guess the new code fails to check for whatever opt

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56886] [4.9 regression] undesirable instantiation of class template default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56886 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c/56882] ICE: when compiling gegl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56882 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56878] Issue with candidate choice in vect_gen_niters_for_prolog_loop.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56830] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #33 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-09 10:07:47 UTC --- *** Bug 56830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/56854] [4.9 Regression] error: non-decl/MEM_REF LHS in clobber statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56854 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56885] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268 with -O -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug fortran/56887] Test for equality of reals now flagged with a warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/51348] [c++0x] ICE in finish_class_member_access_expr with enum class use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51348 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56793] ICE with scoped enum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56793 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luto at mit dot edu --- Comment

[Bug c++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a polymorphic type gives compilation error messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56892] New: dllexport prevents inline inside dll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56892 Bug #: 56892 Summary: dllexport prevents inline inside dll Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/52072] Several non-deduced contexts not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56886] [4.9 regression] undesirable instantiation of class template default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56886 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56838] [4.9 regression] GCC svn doesn't compile libreoffice 4.0.1.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot

[Bug c++/56892] dllexport prevents inline inside dll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56892 --- Comment #1 from Geoff Worboys 2013-04-09 12:35:33 UTC --- I realised I should add that I put the same code (adjusted for lack of C++11 support) through msvc v17, and can see it optimising the inline calls inside the library binary.

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #5 from Max Reitz 2013-04-09 13:02:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Just add -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns to the already long list of > options > you need for compilation of certain routines in your C library. Th

[Bug fortran/56887] Test for equality of reals now flagged with a warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-04-09 13:17:10 UTC --- On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, xanclic at gmail dot com wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 > > --- Comment #5 from Max Reitz 2013-04-09 13:02:19

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #7 from Max Reitz 2013-04-09 13:20:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, xanclic at gmail dot com wrote: > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 > > > > --- Comment #5 from Max Reitz 2013-0

[Bug middle-end/56883] error openmp parallel for order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0 Known to fail|4.9.0

[Bug fortran/56887] Test for equality of reals now flagged with a warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887 --- Comment #3 from fkrogh at mathalacarte dot com 2013-04-09 13:30:45 UTC --- On 04/09/2013 06:06 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887 > > Tobias Burnus changed: > > What

[Bug rtl-optimization/56885] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268 with -O -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885 --- Comment #5 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-04-09 13:33:53 UTC --- I did simple investigation and found out that 1. Test is compiled successfully without selective scheduling, i.e. with '-fschedule-insns' only. 2. The problem is that selecti

[Bug target/56720] ICE when expanding vcond with floating point unordered comparisons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56720 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Re

[Bug target/56866] gcc 4.7.x/gcc-4.8.x with '-O3 -march=bdver2' misscompiles glibc-2.17/crypt/sha512.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/56881] Miscompilation (optimisation failure?) causing NULL dereference and segfault at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56881 devspam at moreofthesa dot me.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Target||amd64 Known to wo

[Bug rtl-optimization/56885] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268 with -O -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885 --- Comment #6 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-04-09 14:22:28 UTC --- Forgot to mention that __builtin_memset and function argument are not interchangeable since both use the same register di.

[Bug other/56881] Miscompilation (optimisation failure?) causing NULL dereference and segfault at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56881 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-04-09 14:45:33 UTC --- The test case is incomplete, as it lacks both main() and domalloc(). Please add those (in a separate file if you like) so that the test case can be compiled to an executabl

[Bug c++/56698] "array subscript is above array bounds" triggered on code that doesn't have that problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56698 --- Comment #5 from Mike Hommey 2013-04-09 14:54:51 UTC --- As noted in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=854105#c4, fileIndex is uint32_t, so 0 - 1 is UINT32_MAX, which makes the error valid. Now the question is why does it onl

[Bug tree-optimization/48762] valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-09 14:57:25 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Apr 9 14:56:59 2013 New Revision: 197637 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197637&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/48762 *

[Bug plugins/56893] New: gcc-ar-4.7: Cannot find liblto_plugin.so on Darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56893 Bug #: 56893 Summary: gcc-ar-4.7: Cannot find liblto_plugin.so on Darwin Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/48762] valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-09 15:02:01 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Apr 9 15:01:43 2013 New Revision: 197638 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197638&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/48762 *

[Bug tree-optimization/48762] valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56894] New: performance regression in gcc 4.7.x due to a += operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56894 Bug #: 56894 Summary: performance regression in gcc 4.7.x due to a += operation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56894] performance regression in gcc 4.7.x due to a += operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56894 --- Comment #1 from Laurent Aflonsi 2013-04-09 15:23:16 UTC --- Created attachment 29842 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29842 testcase to reproduce

[Bug c++/56895] New: ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 Bug #: 56895 Summary: ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Prio

[Bug plugins/56893] gcc-ar-4.7: Cannot find liblto_plugin.so on Darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56893 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56895] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug target/56890] Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56890] Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebot

[Bug c++/56895] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52072] Several non-deduced contexts not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-09 16:52:07 UTC --- I suppose PR23055 is another Dup?

[Bug c++/33068] volatile struct bit fields not treated as volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33068 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/13452] No error on invalid (I think) C++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13452 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||witmer at averagesoftware

[Bug c++/37885] Accepts invalid CV qualifiers on member function returning function pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37885 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/15485] [tree-ssa] The C++ front-end generates a lot of (void) casts for statements (NVR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15485 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/25466] typeid expression fails to throw bad_typeid according to 5.2.8p2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-09 17:32:49 UTC --- Mind if I take this one?

[Bug c++/25466] typeid expression fails to throw bad_typeid according to 5.2.8p2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org| AssignedTo|paolo.carlin

[Bug c++/16564] g++ seems to go into an infinite loop after errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #15 from Paolo Car

[Bug c++/56859] alignas() fails in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56859 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-09 18:03:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Introduced by my http://gcc.gnu.org/r195051 , potential_constant_expression > returns true about it, because fun in a call expr isn't a FUNCTION_DECL.

[Bug c++/16564] g++ seems to go into an infinite loop after errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564 --- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-04-09 18:04:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Manuel, compile_file changed with this commit: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=118362 > > I seem to remember that anoth

[Bug middle-end/28865] Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong .size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865 --- Comment #7 from Fredrick 2013-04-09 18:10:34 UTC --- HJ, Thanks for pointing the patch. The patch works. I tested it on x86-64. Could this patch be integrated into the mainline GCC? Thanks, Fredrick

[Bug c++/16564] g++ seems to go into an infinite loop after errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-09 18:15:51 UTC --- So: @@ -4178,7 +4178,8 @@ cp_build_binary_op (location_t location, } else if (code0 == INTEGER_TYPE && code1 == INTEGER_TYPE) { - tree const

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-09 18:33:26 UTC --- It seems a bit weird not propagating complain..

[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-09 18:36:41 UTC --- The reason for that is that I don't want errors being printed just when trying to optimize to see if I should warn or not.

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-09 18:37:36 UTC --- Though, there are several other maybe_constant_value calls now in cp/typeck.c, and only 2 of them are guarded with !processing_template_decl. So I guess the warn_for_div_by_zero

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-09 18:46:16 UTC --- Created attachment 29844 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29844 gcc49-pr56895.patch Untested complete patch.

[Bug c++/56895] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-09 18:49:28 UTC --- OK.

[Bug c++/25466] typeid expression fails to throw bad_typeid according to 5.2.8p2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52072] Several non-deduced contexts not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/23055] overload resolution does not find templated function (zero -> pointer)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at

[Bug c++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a polymorphic type gives compilation error messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889 --- Comment #4 from Amali Praveena 2013-04-09 19:02:32 UTC --- Hi Jonathan, The Stack in the example is an abstract type, so I'm explicitly saying that this abstract type cannot be copied or moved; but the derived class vector_stack, which

[Bug c++/56896] New: Missing DIR_SEPARATOR if --with-gxx-include-dir configured as subdir of sysroot

++ --disable-bootstrap --with-gxx-include-dir=/home/ryan/foo/bar/usr/include/4.9.0 --with-sysroot=/home/ryan/foo/bar/ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130409 (experimental) [trunk revision 197644] (GCC) ## - ## ## Platform. ## ~/gnu/gcc/trunk/tmp$ grep -nr gcc_gxx_include_dir * gcc

[Bug c++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a polymorphic type gives compilation error messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler 2013-04-09 19:13:55 UTC --- This issue is not the right place for discussing programming idioms, but as a last comment to the code: Your reference to PL alone does not solve your programing error: You need to d

[Bug c++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a polymorphic type gives compilation error messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889 --- Comment #6 from Amali Praveena 2013-04-09 19:23:38 UTC --- Hi Daniel, The Stack template is an abstract type, so I don't have to add default constructor to it, do I? Since the abstract type can't be copied/moved, i'm explicitly specifying th

[Bug c++/51424] [C++11] G++ should diagnose self-delegating constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Schepler 2013-04-09 19:38:15 UTC --- The diagnostic is easy in the direct case of delegating to the same constructor, but difficult in the indirect case of multiple delegating constructors. (The condition might s

[Bug c/56882] ICE: when compiling gegl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56882 --- Comment #2 from xperience at interia dot pl 2013-04-09 20:03:30 UTC --- Compiler ICE's during compile phase, without LTO. Previous versions of GCC ie. 4.7.1 or 4.6.3 doesn't ICE, and output of gcc -O3 -mtune=native -march=native -fom

[Bug c++/56835] std::promise seems broken on 10.8 lion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot

[Bug c++/23055] overload resolution does not find templated function (zero -> pointer)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug debug/37132] Debug: No DW_TAG_namelist emitted for NAMELISTS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/55487] ICE in mark_jump_label_1, at jump.c:1134 compiling gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c at -O2 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55487 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56835] std::promise seems broken on 10.8 lion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2013-04-09 22:55:27 UTC --- IMHO, this should be closed as invalid since MacPorts is applying unnecessary and invalid patches to gcc 4.8.0.

[Bug c++/56835] std::promise seems broken on 10.8 lion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2013-04-09 22:57:00 UTC --- This has been filed with MacPorts as https://trac.macports.org/ticket/38732

[Bug debug/37132] Debug: No DW_TAG_namelist emitted for NAMELISTS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-09 23:08:35 UTC --- For gdb-support, see http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15353

[Bug middle-end/56791] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault in stage2 gengenrtl -- Incorrect instruction sequence generated by reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56791 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2013-04-09 23:17:04 UTC --- Introduced in r195702. Guess I didn't do enough testing of PA 1.1. Looks like we need to ban symbolic destinations to work around this bug.

[Bug c++/56388] catch(...) in lambda rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56388 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54216] Missing diagnostic for ill-formed anonymous enum declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54216 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >