http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52501
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jayants at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54638
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-20
14:11:34 UTC ---
That means GCC 4.8 miscompiles stage1 GCC 4.7 with flags -march=native -O2
(just to be sure - also without -march=native for STAGE1_CFLAGS?)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54638
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-20 14:13:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> That means GCC 4.8 miscompiles stage1 GCC 4.7 with flags -march=native -O2
> (just to be sure - also without -march=native for STAGE1_CFLAGS?)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54372
--- Comment #5 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-09-20 14:13:28 UTC ---
A candiate patch was sent to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01456.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54638
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-20 14:30:55 UTC ---
Assembling functions:
__cmpti2
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00673bb1 in ira_build ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00673bb1 in ira_build ()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43620
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-20
14:41:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 20 14:41:17 2012
New Revision: 191565
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191565
Log:
PR other/43620
libatomic/
* c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54634
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-20
14:46:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 20 14:46:32 2012
New Revision: 191567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191567
Log:
2012-09-20 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54634
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54312
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-20
14:52:07 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 20 14:51:59 2012
New Revision: 191568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191568
Log:
2012-09-20 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54312
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43620
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-20
14:55:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 20 14:55:03 2012
New Revision: 191569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191569
Log:
PR other/43620
libffi/
* conf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-20
15:08:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > After loop unrolling the above remains unchanged, but the following is
> > insert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54631
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
-DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -W -Wall
-Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc-4.8-20120920/gcc
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120920/gcc/. -I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-20
15:52:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 20 15:52:41 2012
New Revision: 191570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191570
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-20
15:58:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 20 15:58:51 2012
New Revision: 191571
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191571
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43620
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-20
16:30:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 20 16:30:06 2012
New Revision: 191573
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191573
Log:
PR other/43620
boehm-gc/
* Ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54631
--- Comment #2 from Diego Novillo 2012-09-20
16:31:12 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Thu Sep 20 16:31:05 2012
New Revision: 191574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191574
Log:
PR target/54631
* config/vxw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54643
Bug #: 54643
Summary: Build hangs compiling unwind-arm.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54643
Ryan Mansfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at codesourcery dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54644
Bug #: 54644
Summary: [4.8 Regression] r191484 causes FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/execute/multi-ix.c execution, -O1 on
alpha
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54644
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #36 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 17:47:38
UTC ---
Created attachment 28231
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28231
Build patched GNU GCC 4.6.4 prerelease for ColdFire uClinux
Notes to download, patch, and bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54644
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-20 17:48:00
UTC ---
Created attachment 28232
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28232
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54644
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-20 17:50:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 28233
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28233
Failing assembly, created with r191512
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #37 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 17:51:28
UTC ---
Created attachment 28234
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28234
Makefile to build GCC cross compiler and binutils for ColdFire uClinux
Makefile used to buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54638
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-20 17:52:11 UTC ---
4.6.3 also fails to build with the same error.
I guess 4.8 would also fail if it still could be build without C++.
% ~/gcc/configure --disable-werror --disable-multil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54644
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-20 17:53:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 28235
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28235
Good assembly, created with r191512, backed-out r191484
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #38 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 17:54:41
UTC ---
Created attachment 28236
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28236
Patches for GCC 4.7.2 (prerelease)
Patches to fix stack limit checking for GCC 4.7.2 (prerel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #39 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 17:57:32
UTC ---
Created attachment 28237
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28237
Build patched GNU GCC 4.7.2 prerelease for ColdFire uClinux
Notes to download, patch, and bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54631
--- Comment #3 from Diego Novillo 2012-09-20
17:58:34 UTC ---
Should be fixed in trunk. Robert, could you please double check?
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #40 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 18:58:01
UTC ---
Created attachment 28238
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28238
Patches for GCC 4.8.0 (experimental)
Patches to fix stack limit checking for GCC 4.8.0 (expe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen 2012-09-20
19:13:25 UTC ---
Forgot to include the error message, which is causing the failures:
/home/pthaugen/src/gcc/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/torture/vector-compare-2.c:9:1:
warning: GCC vecto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-20
19:19:05 UTC ---
gcc.dg/pch and g++.dg/pch just completed here without problems. I don't see how
a scheduler patch could cause primarily PCH failures. Can you check your
bisection, and can you r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-20 19:46:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This test is now failing on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu due to warning
> messages
> being emitted for 32-bit.
I was kind of expecting that (mentione
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54638
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-20
20:03:29 UTC ---
> Wrong warning flags for building avr-c.o
Looks like fallout from
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=190439 that changed the
compiler without adjusting the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-09-20
20:23:35 UTC ---
A candidate patch was sent to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01492.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630
--- Comment #2 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 20:28:08 UTC
---
This bug also occurs when --enable-languages=c,c++. I am building a cross
compiler for ColdFire uClinux, TARGET=m68k-uclinux. On Mac OS X
HOST=BUILD=x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0, t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630
--- Comment #3 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 20:30:29 UTC
---
Richard,
Wrong track ... I found the problem (which also occurs when
--enable-languages=c,c++). See my posting.
Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
ba...@usgs.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54638
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-20 20:32:58
UTC ---
A simple input causes:
[hjl@gnu-mic-2 gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.i
typedef int TItype __attribute__ ((mode (TI)));
int
foo (TItype a, TItype b)
{
return a < b;
}
[hjl@gnu-mic-2 gcc]$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
--- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-09-20
20:49:10 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Sep 20 20:49:06 2012
New Revision: 191589
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191589
Log:
PR c/54103
* c-typeck.c (buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-20
20:49:27 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Sep 20 20:49:20 2012
New Revision: 191590
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191590
Log:
2012-09-20 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
--- Comment #8 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-09-20
20:50:27 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Sep 20 20:50:17 2012
New Revision: 191591
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191591
Log:
PR c/54552
* c-typeck.c (c_ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-20
21:46:10 UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01441.html for the typical
failures of libgomp.fortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54643
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-20
22:01:57 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Thu Sep 20 22:01:47 2012
New Revision: 191595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191595
Log:
PR bootstrap/54643
* haifa-sch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54638
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-20 22:07:00
UTC ---
ira-build.o is miscompiled at -O2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54646
Bug #: 54646
Summary: gcc-4.7 crashes during compilation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54647
Bug #: 54647
Summary: Segmentation fault in get_expr_value_id with -O2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54644
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54644
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54647
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54647
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-20
23:55:35 UTC ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54647
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54631
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolu
-4.8.0-1000
/bin/sh ../gcc-4.8-20120920/mkinstalldirs
/sw/src/fink.build/root-gcc48-4.8.0-1000/sw/lib/gcc4.8
/sw/src/fink.build/root-gcc48-4.8.0-1000/sw/lib/gcc4.8
mkdir /sw/src/fink.build/root-gcc48-4.8.0-1000/sw/lib
mkdir /sw/src/fink.build/root-gcc48-4.8.0-1000/sw/lib/gcc4.8
rm -rf
/sw/src
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Dehao Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at google dot com
--- Commen
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: leo...@volnitsky.com
I am getting from gcc-4.8.0 20120920 for constexpr function:
error: integral expression ‘is_range&>()’ is not constant
With gcc-4.7.1 (and with gcc-4.8 older than a mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54648
--- Comment #1 from Leonid Volnitsky 2012-09-21
00:59:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 28241
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28241
main.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54649
Bug #: 54649
Summary: Go bootstrap failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54649
--- Comment #1 from Dehao Chen 2012-09-21 01:15:17
UTC ---
This problem is caused by the inconsistency between r191338 and r191494, both
of which handle the debug info.
The problem is that when we set the line number for stmts in the fin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54650
Bug #: 54650
Summary: libgomp regression
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54650
--- Comment #1 from Dehao Chen 2012-09-21 01:23:36
UTC ---
This error should be a bug exposed by this patch.
In expand_omp_taskreg, it calls move_sese_region_to_fn with
gimple_block(entry_stmt) as the root of the block tree. However, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54642
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-09-21
03:23:51 UTC ---
Regression hunt so far shows that r191448 was okay but r191493 fails. These are
for builds configured as...
../gcc-4.8-20120920/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54642
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2012-09-21
05:08:47 UTC ---
Further regression hunting shows r191463 is okay but r191474 fails.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54102
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-09-21
06:29:39 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Fri Sep 21 06:29:32 2012
New Revision: 191603
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191603
Log:
2012-09-20 Benjamin Kosnik
PR
101 - 174 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
