http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 16:15:10
UTC ---
Created attachment 24831
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24831
A testcase
elf/rtld.c in glibc is miscompiled by
-std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -fPIC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 16:15:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> A shot-in-the-dark change:
>
> (define_insn "*add_1"
> [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r,rm,r,r")
> (plus:SWI48
> (match_operand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 16:24:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> X32 dynamic linker is miscompiled:
BTW: These two functions look the same to me.
"lea(%rsi,%rdx,1),%edx" is the same as "add%esi,%edx".
Can you plea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-25
16:39:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 24832
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24832
possible fix
The ICE caught exactly what it was supposed to -- a difference in
unwind info acros
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 16:41:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > X32 dynamic linker is miscompiled:
>
> BTW: These two functions look the same to me.
>
> "lea(%rsi,%rdx,1),%edx" is the same as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 16:58:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Working ld.so sets EDX properly with:
Sorry, I need a testcase to debug this...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #88 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-25 17:02:45 UTC ---
> --- Comment #87 from Paolo Carlini
> 2011-07-22 21:49:49 UTC ---
> Now the pragma issue is solved. Good. I don't know Rainer if that means we can
> do something
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49836
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 17:08:53 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jul 25 17:08:48 2011
New Revision: 176761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176761
Log:
2011-07-25 Paolo Carlini
Nath
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49836
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #89 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-25
17:14:13 UTC ---
Ok, thanks. I'm afraid Jon will not be able to contribute much over the next
few weeks, in the meanwhile I'll try to find the time to go through that old
message of yours to the mailin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49845
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn 2011-07-25 17:27:26
UTC ---
The patch allows me to get past the failure. The current solution seems good
enough for me. Someone else can implement the alternative when it's needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24821|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49845
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 17:46:29
UTC ---
Second attempt to fix this PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02061.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47593
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
CC: ja...@redhat.com
Target: x86_64-fedora16-linux-gnu
FAIL gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20110725 (experim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49845
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 17:50:19 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jul 25 17:50:13 2011
New Revision: 176765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176765
Log:
2011-07-25 Paolo Carlini
PR boot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49845
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 18:03:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 24831 [details]
> A testcase
>
> elf/rtld.c in glibc is miscompiled by
>
> -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -fPIC
GCC generates many relocation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47128
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 18:11:47
UTC ---
I will close this PR when the patches from Tobias will go on trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01892.html
This patch-set removes support for CLooG-Parma.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Richard H
dl_main, .-dl_main
.hidden_start
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.7.0 20110725 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 18:29:08
UTC ---
Working x32 GCC generates:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat foo.s
.file"foo.c"
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globldl_main
.typedl_main, @function
dl_main:
.LFB0:
.cfi_start
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47089
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grosser at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #13 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 19:39:27
UTC ---
Another problem:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/bar.c
typedef unsigned int Elf32_Addr;
extern void _start (void);
int
dl_main ( Elf32_Addr *user_entry)
{
if (*user_entry == (Elf32_Addr) _star
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #15 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 19:51:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Another problem:
> /tmp/bar.c:10:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 6 5 7 3 (set (reg:SI 67)
> (symbol_ref:SI ("_start") [flags 0x41] _start>))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #41 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-25
19:58:52 UTC ---
The testcase in Comment #30 has the types wrong, the below is a corrected
version (the substance of the issue doesn't change at all). I'm also thinking
of checking in the library bits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 19:59:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Another problem:
>
> > /tmp/bar.c:10:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
> > (insn 6 5 7 3 (set (reg:SI 67)
> > (symbol_ref:SI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 20:00:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > (In reply to comment #14)
> > > Another problem:
> >
> > > /tmp/bar.c:10:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
> > > (insn 6 5 7 3 (set (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 20:10:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Another problem:
>
> [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/bar.c
> typedef unsigned int Elf32_Addr;
> extern void _start (void);
> int
> dl_main ( Elf32_Addr *user_entry)
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 20:13:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Another problem:
> >
> > [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/bar.c
> > typedef unsigned int Elf32_Addr;
> > extern void _start (void);
> > i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47509
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-25
20:14:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. git clone git://github.com/ethersex/ethersex.git
> 2. cd ethersex/
> 3. make menuconfig
> -> Make sure that "UDP support" is act
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Summary: m68k gcj-4.6 NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 ==
NULL)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 21:49:53
UTC ---
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02209.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-25
22:53:29 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Jul 25 22:53:25 2011
New Revision: 176773
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176773
Log:
PR debug/49841
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #42 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-26
00:10:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (we *do* have PRs about constexpr vs diagnostics)
Notably 45923, which I have just closed as fixed by my June 29 patch.
The comment 8 testcase results in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #43 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-26
00:26:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #42)
> Seems like we should add BUILT_IN_ISINF and its variants to
> builtin_valid_in_constant_expr_p.
Actually, we seem to ignore the arguments when a function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #44 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-26
00:29:22 UTC ---
Please.. ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
Summary: False positive warning triggered by
-Wmaybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Lacombe 2011-07-26
01:31:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 24834
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24834
reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49799
--- Comment #8 from Carrot 2011-07-26 02:51:39 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> No, you miss the point.
>
> Internally we must not generate (ashift (reg) (const_int)) where the const is
> negative.
>
> Note that your testcasegenerates a reg s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49347
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-26
05:07:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Jason, will there be restrict support in C++ 2011?
No.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49671
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-26
05:28:50 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Tue Jul 26 05:28:45 2011
New Revision: 176782
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176782
Log:
2011-07-25 Andrew Pinski
PR tree-opt/4967
101 - 153 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
