http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49624
Summary: ICE with pointer-bound remapping
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49622
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49496
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49607
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49622
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
09:31:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 24668
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24668
preprocessed source
Confirmed. Preprocessed source attached - segfaults with any of 4.4.x with
p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49621
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49622
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49596
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49620
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49622
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04
09:44:18 UTC ---
Ah sorry, I've been trying to reproduce it with cc1 instead of cc1plus.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49617
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49620
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-04
09:58:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> So you want a buildable executable for a single line of bugged code.
The source code you posted is not self-contained and the attachment is a
compressed a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-07-04 10:05:10 UTC
---
split_bbs_on_noreturn_calls is supposed to handle this scenario...
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-07-04
10:11:03 UTC ---
H.J,
if glibc implementation beats gcc even for size of 4, I guess we could just
drop the pattern or enable at at -Os only.
Or are there easy cases we want to inline, like we do for mem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-04
10:14:40 UTC ---
> Eric/Richard, what do you think? The comments seem to be fuzzy to me, some
> comments say that MEM_NOTRAP_P only apply to the position where the MEM is
> originally used (and in th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49625
Summary: GCC 4.6.* with Ada can't bootstrapped on MINGW
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-07-04 10:37:11 UTC ---
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-07-04 10:05:10
> UTC ---
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2011-07-04
10:49:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 24670
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24670
memcpy/memset testing script
HJ,
can you please run the attached script with new glibc as
sh test_st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #21 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-07-04 10:58:14 UTC ---
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > Indeed, I simply made all bare-metal targets use newlib-stdint.h as a
> > default, but since AVR has its own li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49623
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-07-04 11:04:36 UTC ---
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Created attachment 24666
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24666
> gcc47-pr49623.patch
>
> U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
11:30:17 UTC ---
I'll drop the assert (too many weird asserts in the vectorizer anyway).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49626
Summary: Explicit conversion skipped when followed by
conversion to a wider type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49626
--- Comment #1 from Angel Tsankov 2011-07-04
11:37:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 24671
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24671
Demonstrates the case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627
Summary: NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49460
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6, 4.6.1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
12:06:22 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 4 12:06:17 2011
New Revision: 175803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175803
Log:
2011-07-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
12:08:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 4 12:08:50 2011
New Revision: 175804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175804
Log:
2011-07-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24672|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
12:21:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 4 12:21:45 2011
New Revision: 175808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175808
Log:
2011-07-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
12:18:29 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 4 12:18:22 2011
New Revision: 175805
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175805
Log:
2011-07-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
--- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-04
12:28:05 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jul 4 12:28:02 2011
New Revision: 175809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175809
Log:
PR target/44643
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-04
12:33:03 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jul 4 12:33:00 2011
New Revision: 175810
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175810
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-04 Georg-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.6.1 |4.6.2
Target Milestone|4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04
12:39:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 24674
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24674
gcc46-pr49618.patch
Untested more conservative 4.6 fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
--- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-04
12:48:07 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jul 4 12:48:04 2011
New Revision: 175811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175811
Log:
PR target/34734
PR target/44643
* gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34734
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-04
12:48:07 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jul 4 12:48:04 2011
New Revision: 175811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175811
Log:
PR target/34734
PR target/44643
* gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
13:25:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 4 13:25:21 2011
New Revision: 175812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175812
Log:
2011-07-04 Richard Guenther
Backpo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43088
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49600
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-04 13:42:00
UTC ---
Here is the testcase:
---
long int seedi;
long lo;
double ran() {
long hi;
long test;
hi = seedi / 127773L;
test = 16807L * lo - 2836L * hi;
if (test > 0) {
seedi = test;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Target Milestone|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04
14:11:50 UTC ---
The problem is that simplify_gen_binary (IOR, mode, ); can simplify
into anything, in this case into a (subreg:HI (reg:SI ...) 0), so we really
don't know the argument of its first
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48822
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenther at suse dot de|
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48822
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
14:24:13 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 4 14:24:10 2011
New Revision: 175813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175813
Log:
2011-07-04 Richard Guenther
Backp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-07-04
14:27:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Created attachment 24583 [details]
> More tests for rounding
>
> If it helps, I added some more tests for this.
>
> By removing the code lines in questio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #13 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-04
14:29:27 UTC ---
Confirmed... gcc46-pr49618.patch solves the problem here, workaround patches
from freetz project are no more necessary.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42146
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42146
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2011-07-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #14 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-04
14:38:05 UTC ---
Thank you gcc folks and all involved people to fix this bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
--- Comment #13 from Justin Lebar
2011-07-04 14:40:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created attachment 24670 [details]
> memcpy/memset testing script
>
> HJ,
> can you please run the attached script with new glibc as
> sh test_stringop 64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
--- Comment #14 from Justin Lebar
2011-07-04 15:00:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 24676
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24676
Test results from my core i7
cc-4.7 --disable-nls --disable-shared
--enable-languages=c,c++ --with-dwarf2 --disable-lto
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20110704 (experimental) (GCC)
GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.0 20110704 (experimental) (avr)
compiled by GNU C version 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291], GMP
version 5.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42146
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |translation
Version|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49542
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42146
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-07-04 15:23:07 UTC ---
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> As far as I can see, it's not a target bug. But unsure about the correct
> component, I cose "translation" as of fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42146
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|translation |c
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
Summary: [OOP] ICE on obsolescent assumed length deferred type
bound character function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42146
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-04
15:35:45 UTC ---
tree_low_cst asserts something about the ability to represent the constant
in a HOST_WIDE_INT which has a target-specific (minimal) width. In your
case HOST_WIDE_INT is 32bit where
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49600
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-04 16:26:13 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jul 4 16:26:08 2011
New Revision: 175817
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175817
Log:
PR target/49600
* config/i386/i386.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49600
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49631
Summary: Driver --help should use common help code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #15 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-04
16:47:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 24677
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24677
Simple testcase-script for gcc-PR49618
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #17 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-04
16:48:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 24679
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24679
old_atexit.os_OptLevel-O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #20 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-04
16:50:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 24682
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24682
old_atexit.os_OptLevel-Os
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #18 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-04
16:49:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 24680
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24680
old_atexit.os_OptLevel-O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #19 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-04
16:49:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 24681
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24681
old_atexit.os_OptLevel-O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #16 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-04
16:48:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 24678
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24678
old_atexit.os_OptLevel-O0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49602
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04
17:19:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 4 17:19:52 2011
New Revision: 175818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175818
Log:
PR debug/49602
* tree-into-ssa.c (rewrite_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-04 17:24:39 UTC ---
> The following patch should fix the problem:
> Index: ipa.c
> ===
> --- ipa.c (revision 17574
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49364
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-07-04 17:27:08 UTC ---
On 7/1/2011 6:47 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500
> Hi,
> here is fixed version that does not warn. Can someone tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49602
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04
18:53:58 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 4 18:53:56 2011
New Revision: 175821
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175821
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49472
* simplify-rtx.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-07-04 18:57:45 UTC ---
patch ;-)
Index: gcc/params.def
===
--- gcc/params.def (revision 175820)
+++ gcc/params.def (working cop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Werner Boschmann 2011-07-04 19:29:50 UTC ---
"C417: A function name shall not be declared with an asterisk type-param-value
unless it is of type CHAR- ACTER and is the name of the result of an external
function or the name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-04 20:21:55 UTC ---
Here is a related deferred-length example:
module abc
implicit none
type::abc_type
contains
procedure::abc_function
end type abc_type
contains
function ab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Johnson 2011-07-04 20:32:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Making this work reliably is probably more work than making GCC use the flags
> from more cases from regular C code.
Does that mean each such case would need
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49632
Summary: ICE in compute_affine_dependence
(tree-data-ref.c:4038) with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49633
Summary: GCC -march=native on Intel Sandy Bridge causes some
'invalid opcode'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04
21:04:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 4 21:04:54 2011
New Revision: 175825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175825
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49619
* combine.c (comb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49540
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-04
21:08:00 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jul 4 21:07:57 2011
New Revision: 175827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175827
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-06-06 Jakub
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
