http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-04 10:11:03 UTC --- H.J, if glibc implementation beats gcc even for size of 4, I guess we could just drop the pattern or enable at at -Os only. Or are there easy cases we want to inline, like we do for memcpy? Unlike memcpy, memcmp/strcmp is more difficult to handle because the amount of memory it will process is harder to estimate. I guess still with known alignment and/or small upper bound of object size, inline code would be a win.
