[Bug c/48552] ICE with void type expressions in asm inputs/outputs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48552 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48517] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in build_unary_op, at c-typeck.c:3786

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48517 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/48565] libstdc++ testsuite failures when using -pipe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48565 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-12 07:48:36 UTC --- Those tests have to use -save-temps to inspect the assembler output, I think the answer is to not use -pipe

[Bug libstdc++/48566] libstdc++-v3 testsuite failures due to missing includes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48566 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48557] [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors with void as operand of binary built-in operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48557 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler 2011-04-12 07:52:17 UTC --- Oops: The first comment was supposed to mean: "The following program is *ill-formed*, but should be well-formed according to SFINAE rules:"

[Bug c/48564] good hello welell some.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48564 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48568] New: Missing documentation for __attribute__((visibility ("protected"))) on variables.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48568 Summary: Missing documentation for __attribute__((visibility ("protected"))) on variables. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/48434] [4.7 Regression] Large SpecCPUFP Performance Regression for Thumb-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48434 Ian Bolton changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/21164] libjava tests uses absolute paths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21164 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-12 09:04:09 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Tue Apr 12 09:04:05 2011 New Revision: 172302 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172302 Log: libjava: PR testsuite/21164 * testsuite/lib/

[Bug libstdc++/48566] libstdc++-v3 testsuite failures due to missing includes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48566 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-12 09:05:33 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Apr 12 09:05:30 2011 New Revision: 172303 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172303 Log: 2011-04-12 Allan McRae PR libstd

[Bug libstdc++/48566] libstdc++-v3 testsuite failures due to missing includes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48566 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-12 09:05:45 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Apr 12 09:05:41 2011 New Revision: 172304 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172304 Log: 2011-04-12 Allan McRae PR libstd

[Bug testsuite/21164] libjava tests uses absolute paths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21164 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48566] libstdc++-v3 testsuite failures due to missing includes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48566 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48476] [C++0x] conversion between std::tuple which have reference member is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48476 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlin

[Bug testsuite/48565] libstdc++ testsuite failures when using -pipe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48565 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/48569] New: internal compiler error: in build_zero_init_1, at cp/init.c:278

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48569 Summary: internal compiler error: in build_zero_init_1, at cp/init.c:278 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug bootstrap/48556] Gcc 4.6.0 bootstrap fails with in-tree GMP/MPFR/MPC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48556 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-12 10:27:10 UTC --- You should always prefer the system versions of these libraries. For example ppl links against gmp already.

[Bug middle-end/48558] -Warray-bounds fails to detect the out of bound array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48558 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/48560] [4.6/4.7 Regression] -Warray-bounds fails to detect the out of bound array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48560 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48476] [C++0x] conversion between std::tuple which have reference member is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48476 --- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-12 10:31:37 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Apr 12 10:31:33 2011 New Revision: 172309 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172309 Log: 2011-04-12 Takaya Saito PR libs

[Bug c/48561] internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48561 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48563] EOF not at EOL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48563 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/48568] Missing documentation for __attribute__((visibility ("protected"))) on variables.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48568 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Severity|norma

[Bug c/46076] [4.6/4.7 regression] constant propagation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-12 10:44:20 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 12 10:44:15 2011 New Revision: 172310 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172310 Log: 2011-04-12 Richard Guenther PR tree-o

[Bug java/48515] [4.6] GCJ fails to compile jni.cc because of reflection errors on i686-w64-mingw32 target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48515 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #84 from Mike Hommey 2011-04-12 10:53:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #83) > > I am not sure if this is GCC bug or elfhack, but I would guess for > elfhack actually. > > I guess you're right, because when I move the swap definitions:

[Bug rtl-optimization/48549] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Combiner ICE with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48549 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-12 10:53:50 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 12 10:53:47 2011 New Revision: 172311 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172311 Log: PR rtl-optimization/48549 * combine.c (prop

[Bug target/48519] wrong return-value, with an if () {} after return

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug regression/48570] New: gcc-4.6: wrong subscription with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570 Summary: gcc-4.6: wrong subscription with -std=c++0x Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression AssignedTo: u

[Bug regression/48570] gcc-4.6: wrong subscription with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48571] New: Missed data-dependence for (bogus?) reconstructed array-refs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48571 Summary: Missed data-dependence for (bogus?) reconstructed array-refs Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug regression/48570] gcc-4.6: wrong subscription with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/48571] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed data-dependence for (bogus?) reconstructed array-refs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48571 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug regression/48570] gcc-4.6: wrong subscription with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-12 12:21:48 UTC --- Breakpoint 1, main () at sub.cc:4 4 const wchar_t& z0 = (L"01234")[0]; (gdb) n 5 const wchar_t& z1 = (L"01234")[1]; (gdb) 6 const wchar_t& z2 = (L"01234")[2];

[Bug tree-optimization/48571] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed data-dependence for (bogus?) reconstructed array-refs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48571 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-12 12:24:46 UTC --- To also fail for 64bit change it to for (i = 1; i < 624; ++i) { __SIZE_TYPE__ ii = (__SIZE_TYPE__)i + ((__SIZE_TYPE__)-4)/4; *(unsigned int *)((void *)c + (__SIZE

[Bug regression/48570] gcc-4.6: wrong subscription with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-12 12:30:54 UTC --- Yeah, cxx_eval_array_reference doesn't expect to have sizeof (x) > 1 accesses to STRING_CSTs. Unfortunately, fold_read_from_constant_string doesn't handle those either, and as for C++

[Bug regression/48570] gcc-4.6: wrong subscription with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-12 12:44:03 UTC --- There are lots of optimizations that are only present for narrow strings but logically make sense for wide strings as well (for example, some str* and mem* built-in f

[Bug tree-optimization/48571] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed data-dependence for (bogus?) reconstructed array-refs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48571 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-12 13:11:56 UTC --- Re-constructing array-refs (and thus an index space) is invalid. Which means the C frontend should better change its behavior and not lower all array accesses to pointer arithmetic

[Bug target/48572] New: [4.7 regression] gcc.target/mips/mips-{3d,ps}-?.c tests ICE on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48572 Summary: [4.7 regression] gcc.target/mips/mips-{3d,ps}-?.c tests ICE on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/48519] wrong return-value, with an if () {} after return

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519 --- Comment #7 from Herbert 2011-04-12 13:41:06 UTC --- Hi, I don't know why I am the only one with the bug ..? The bug doesn't happen if I write a second return at the end of the function, so I can solve the problem, but anyway it's curious.. M

[Bug target/48090] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-04-12 13:42:52 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Apr 12 13:42:48 2011 New Revision: 172318 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172318 Log: Fix PR target/48090 2011-04-12 Ramana R

[Bug rtl-optimization/48549] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Combiner ICE with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48549 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-12 13:44:35 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 12 13:44:33 2011 New Revision: 172319 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172319 Log: PR rtl-optimization/48549 * combine.c (prop

[Bug rtl-optimization/48549] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Combiner ICE with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48549 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48090] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-04-12 13:52:49 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Apr 12 13:52:46 2011 New Revision: 172320 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172320 Log: Fix PR target/48090 Modified: branc

[Bug target/48090] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-04-12 13:53:39 UTC --- Still need to backport and test on the 4.6 branch. That is next. Ramana

[Bug target/48090] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #15 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-12 13:55:57 UTC --- On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:53:48PM +, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Still need to backport and test on the 4.6 branch. That is next. Small procedural note:

[Bug regression/48570] gcc-4.6: wrong subscription with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48570 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-12 14:01:38 UTC --- Created attachment 23962 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23962 gcc46-pr48570.patch Untested fix (tested just on the new testcase, both on x86_64 and with powerpc c

[Bug middle-end/48573] New: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48573 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unass

[Bug middle-end/48573] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48573 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-12 14:03:18 UTC --- I got /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-ia32corei7/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20031208-1.c: In function 'bar':^M /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-ia32corei7/src-trunk/gcc/te

[Bug middle-end/48573] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48573 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|

[Bug c++/48574] New: ICE (regression w.r.t. 4.6.0)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 Summary: ICE (regression w.r.t. 4.6.0) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/48468] [C++0x][SFINAE] noexcept operator does not handle function templates well

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48468 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48575] New: RTL vector patterns are limited to 26 elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48575 Summary: RTL vector patterns are limited to 26 elements Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg02105.htm l Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/48573] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48573 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-12 14:40:54 UTC --- This is caused by revision 172316: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-04/msg00511.html

[Bug c++/48574] ICE (regression w.r.t. 4.6.0)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48574] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE (regression w.r.t. 4.6.0)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/48574] ICE (regression w.r.t. 4.6.0)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 vincenzo Innocente changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE|ICE (regression w.r.t.

[Bug c++/48574] ICE (regression w.r.t. 4.6.0)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente 2011-04-12 14:55:26 UTC --- sorry Richard, I suspect I've overwritten your changes by mistake vincenzo On 12 Apr, 2011, at 4:52 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug target/48576] New: wrong code when accessing variables in a large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48576 Summary: wrong code when accessing variables in a large stack frame Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/48574] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 vincenzo Innocente changed: What|Removed |Added Target||4.6.1 Summary|ICE (regres

[Bug c++/48574] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug target/48576] wrong code when accessing variables in a large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48576 Siarhei Siamashka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||siarhei.siamashka at gmail

[Bug c/48006] Inefficient optimization depends on builtin integer type of same size.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48006 Carlo Wood changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c/48006] Inefficient optimization depends on builtin integer type of same size.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48006 Carlo Wood changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48573] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48573 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48413] [4.7 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48413 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48367] [4.7 Regression] 200.sixtrack/301.apsi in SPEC CPU 2000 are miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #85 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-12 16:22:13 UTC --- Thanks for analysis. removing inline should work too. while as qoi issue gcc can find the missing bodu, i think it is better to avoid more hacks. for 4.7 i will implement the new comdat

[Bug c/46076] [4.6/4.7 regression] constant propagation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #25 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-12 16:24:33 UTC --- backport to 4.6 for 4.6.1? I'll apply locally and report any issues in the meantime.

[Bug testsuite/47400] Several UCN tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B and IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47400 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-12 16:37:08 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Tue Apr 12 16:37:04 2011 New Revision: 172326 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172326 Log: gcc: Backport from mainline: 2011-02-11 Rai

[Bug c++/48577] New: "unexpected ast of kind unordered_expr" using isnan()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48577 Summary: "unexpected ast of kind unordered_expr" using isnan() Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/48577] "unexpected ast of kind unordered_expr" using isnan()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48577 --- Comment #1 from Jens Maurer 2011-04-12 16:39:03 UTC --- It works with gcc 4.5.2, so it seems to be a 4.6 regression.

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #86 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-04-12 16:42:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #85) > does elfhack work for you now? Yes, no problems anymore.

[Bug c++/48577] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] "unexpected ast of kind unordered_expr" using isnan()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48577 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48574] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48574 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/48577] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] "unexpected ast of kind unordered_expr" using isnan()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48577 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-12 16:56:08 UTC --- isn't this PR 48369 ?

[Bug c++/48577] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] "unexpected ast of kind unordered_expr" using isnan()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48577 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-12 16:59:41 UTC --- Yes it looks identical - is it still present on the 4.6 branch? Did Jason only fix the ICE, not the "sorry" ?

[Bug c++/48577] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] "unexpected ast of kind unordered_expr" using isnan()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48577 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/48369] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/semantics.c:7746

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48369 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.maurer at gmx dot net --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/48578] New: Range-based for-loops do not compile when -nostdinc is given

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48578 Summary: Range-based for-loops do not compile when -nostdinc is given Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/48577] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] "unexpected ast of kind unordered_expr" using isnan()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48577 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-12 17:34:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > The problem is my 4_6 dates back to the day before the day fixed the issue ;) aha :)

[Bug c++/48569] internal compiler error: in build_zero_init_1, at cp/init.c:278

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48569 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48569] internal compiler error: in build_zero_init_1, at cp/init.c:278

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48569 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-12 17:38:15 UTC --- Created attachment 23966 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23966 pr48569.ii Slightly reduced testcase.

[Bug c++/48578] Range-based for-loops do not compile when -nostdinc is given

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48578 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46076] [4.6/4.7 regression] constant propagation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-12 17:39:29 UTC --- No, such big changes shouldn't be backported to release branches.

[Bug tree-optimization/43270] array-bounds false negative

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43270 Matt Hargett changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #21 from Matt Hargett

[Bug c/46076] [4.6/4.7 regression] constant propagation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #27 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-12 18:15:33 UTC --- That's unfortunate. Can you adjust the target milestone, then?

[Bug c++/46890] [4.6 Regression] Failed to compile scummvm's player_v4a.cpp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46890 Matt Hargett changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #12 from Matt Hargett

[Bug middle-end/48579] New: ICE: verify_flow_info: too many outgoing branch edges from bb 3 with asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48579 Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info: too many outgoing branch edges from bb 3 with asm goto Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug middle-end/42371] dead code not eliminated during folding with whole-program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371 Matt Hargett changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48578] Range-based for-loops do not compile when -nostdinc is given

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48578 --- Comment #2 from Job Noorman 2011-04-12 18:29:41 UTC --- Ok I see. Thanks for the clarification!

[Bug tree-optimization/48195] ICE: vector VEC(ipa_node_params_t,base) index domain error, in ipa_analyze_node at ipa-prop.c:1525 with -flto --param partial-inlining-entry-probability=101

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48195 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-12 18:31:58 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Tue Apr 12 18:31:55 2011 New Revision: 172332 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172332 Log: 2011-04-12 Martin Jambor PR tree-optimiza

[Bug rtl-optimization/48580] New: missed optimization: integer overflow checks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 Summary: missed optimization: integer overflow checks Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization A

[Bug tree-optimization/48195] ICE: vector VEC(ipa_node_params_t,base) index domain error, in ipa_analyze_node at ipa-prop.c:1525 with -flto --param partial-inlining-entry-probability=101

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48195 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48559] parallel-mode vs C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559 sing...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46898] libgcc build failure on lm32-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898 Thibault North changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnorth at fedoraproject dot

[Bug fortran/48456] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Realloc on assignment: ICE in fold_binary_loc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-12 19:14:53 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Tue Apr 12 19:14:49 2011 New Revision: 172339 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172339 Log: 2011-04-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48360 P

[Bug fortran/48360] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on array assignment statement with allocatable LHS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-12 19:14:52 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Tue Apr 12 19:14:49 2011 New Revision: 172339 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172339 Log: 2011-04-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48360 P

[Bug libstdc++/48559] parallel-mode vs C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-12 19:20:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > On the other hand, we sometimes need references to elements of the > random-access input sequence(s). We could always use an iterator, but that > might be

[Bug c++/48581] New: [C++0x][SFINAE] Lack of ADL in default template argument types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48581 Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] Lack of ADL in default template argument types Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

  1   2   >