[Bug c++/48266] New: deprecated("message") fails to print message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48266 Summary: deprecated("message") fails to print message Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedT

[Bug c/48267] New: incorrect signed overflow warning when a pointer cannot possibly overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48267 Summary: incorrect signed overflow warning when a pointer cannot possibly overflow Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priori

[Bug libstdc++/48257] std::string::assign() corrupts std::string static data when called on emptyString1 using emptyString2.data()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48262] [4.7 Regression] Subversion id 171341 breaks various vectorization files on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/48268] New: Incomplete Type (seems auto/c++0x specific)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48268 Summary: Incomplete Type (seems auto/c++0x specific) Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig

[Bug c++/44500] [C++0x] Bogus narrowing conversion error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44500 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-24 08:58:46 UTC --- The committee closed my DR as not a defect. We could still downgrade this error to a pedwarn, though. http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#1078

[Bug c++/44500] [C++0x] Bogus narrowing conversion error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44500 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48257] std::string::assign() corrupts std::string static data when called on emptyString1 using emptyString2.data()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-24 09:29:28 UTC --- Also, GCC 4.1.2 is ancient and not supported here, you should either report bugs to the vendor of your version (Red Hat) or refer to a supported version. As for being disres

[Bug c++/48268] Incomplete Type (seems auto/c++0x specific)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48268 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-24 09:32:33 UTC --- Seems to be fixed already on trunk, and probably 4.6.0

[Bug libstdc++/48257] std::string::assign() corrupts std::string static data when called on emptyString1 using emptyString2.data()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-24 09:37:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > > I don't see any errors being thrown. I am not trying to nit-pick but I've > raised this issue because I was affected by it and had to spend seve

[Bug rtl-optimization/48263] [4.7 Regression]: build fails for cris-elf in libgfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48263 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/48257] std::string::assign() corrupts std::string static data when called on emptyString1 using emptyString2.data()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257 --- Comment #8 from Mohsin 2011-03-24 09:50:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Also, GCC 4.1.2 is ancient and not supported here, you should either report > bugs to the vendor of your version (Red Hat) or refer to a supported version.

[Bug libstdc++/48257] std::string::assign() corrupts std::string static data when called on emptyString1 using emptyString2.data()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257 --- Comment #9 from Mohsin 2011-03-24 09:52:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > I don't see any errors being thrown. I am not trying to nit-pick but I've > > raised this issue because I was affected by

[Bug middle-end/48269] New: Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 Summary: Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Ass

[Bug middle-end/48269] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 --- Comment #1 from Ismail "cartman" Donmez 2011-03-24 09:55:23 UTC --- Created attachment 23766 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23766 Preprocessed source

[Bug middle-end/48269] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 marcus at jet dot franken.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marcus at jet dot

[Bug middle-end/48270] New: [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 Summary: [4.7 Regression] New test failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo:

[Bug libstdc++/48257] std::string::assign() corrupts std::string static data when called on emptyString1 using emptyString2.data()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257 --- Comment #10 from Mohsin 2011-03-24 10:21:56 UTC --- Two questions here: 1. Is the behaviour undefined for __n < number of elements in __s? 2. For cases undefined in the specs, do we take steps to ensure robustness? I still cannot

[Bug libstdc++/48257] std::string::assign() corrupts std::string static data when called on emptyString1 using emptyString2.data()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257 --- Comment #11 from Mohsin 2011-03-24 10:24:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Two questions here: > > 1. Is the behaviour undefined for __n < number of elements in __s? > Oops! I meant for __n > number of elements in __s.

[Bug middle-end/48269] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-24 10:43:29 UTC --- D.83064_56 = in_int_3(D)->strong_source; D.83065_57 = D.83064_56->_vptr.KisPacketSource; D.83086_59 = MEM[(int (*__vtbl_ptr_type) (void) *)D.83065_57 + 92B]; D.73136

[Bug middle-end/48269] [4.6 Regression] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone

[Bug c++/48268] Incomplete Type (seems auto/c++0x specific)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48268 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/48269] [4.6 Regression] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46562 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-24 11:23:34 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 24 11:23:29 2011 New Revision: 171386 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171386 Log: 2011-03-24 Richard Guenther

[Bug libstdc++/48257] std::string::assign() corrupts std::string static data when called on emptyString1 using emptyString2.data()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-24 11:27:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Two questions here: > > > > 1. Is the behaviour undefined for __n < number of elements in __s? > > > > Oops!

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment

[Bug c++/44500] [C++0x] Bogus narrowing conversion error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44500 --- Comment #18 from Gunther Piez 2011-03-24 11:45:47 UTC --- I have chosen the "recommended" way and added a cast, -fpermissive would allow to many other dubious constructs to pass. Still I think c++ should get rid of implicit integer con

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46562 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Status|U

[Bug c++/48266] deprecated("message") fails to print message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48266 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED Target Milestone|4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/48267] incorrect signed overflow warning when a pointer cannot possibly overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48267 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status

[Bug c++/48265] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV (recursion in value_dependent_expression_p) when variable is used uninitialised

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48265 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1

[Bug c/48264] Simple dummy program fails with Segmentation Fault upon -shared linking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 --- Comment #4 from Ira Rosen 2011-03-24 12:18:28 UTC --- I tried -m32 too, but I don't see any failures.

[Bug tree-optimization/48271] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_ssa_dominator_optimize (tree-ssa-dom.c:2964) with -O -ftree-vrp -fno-guess-branch-probability -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48271 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_ssa_dominator_optimize (tree-ssa-dom.c:2964) with -O -ftree-vrp -fno-guess-branch-probability -fnon-call-exceptions Product: gcc Version:

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|20

[Bug lto/48259] Internal compiler errors in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48271] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_ssa_dominator_optimize (tree-ssa-dom.c:2964) with -O -ftree-vrp -fno-guess-branch-probability -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48271 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 --- Comment #6 from Ira Rosen 2011-03-24 12:36:18 UTC --- My guess is that I freed data-refs too early. Could someone please check if this patch fixes the failures: Index: tree-ssa-phiopt.c ==

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245 --- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-24 12:40:52 UTC --- AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf. given that Mike has approved, if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64-darwin10, I would think you could

[Bug middle-end/48272] New: internal compiler error: in setup_insn_reg_pressure_info, at haifa-sched.c:1124

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272 Summary: internal compiler error: in setup_insn_reg_pressure_info, at haifa-sched.c:1124 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug middle-end/48269] [4.6 Regression] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-24 12:45:02 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 24 12:44:58 2011 New Revision: 171388 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171388 Log: 2011-03-24 Richard Guenther

[Bug middle-end/48272] internal compiler error: in setup_insn_reg_pressure_info, at haifa-sched.c:1124

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272 --- Comment #1 from sebastian.heg...@tu-dresden.de 2011-03-24 12:46:54 UTC --- Compiles fine when leaving out "-fsched-pressure"

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-24 12:49:13 UTC --- I'm testing this patch.

[Bug target/48273] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in create_copy_of_insn_rtx, at sel-sched-ir.c:5604 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -march=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in create_copy_of_insn_rtx, at sel-sched-ir.c:5604 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -march=core2 Product: gcc Ver

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #16 from Dr. David Kirkby 2011-03-24 13:22:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Let me try and recap. > > The initial report was that 5.3 TL10 did *not* have the error. I discovered > that 5.3 TL10 SP03 does. See [1]. >

[Bug target/48237] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2651 with -fselective-scheduling2 -mtune=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48237 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-24 13:35:30 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Mar 24 13:35:26 2011 New Revision: 171391 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171391 Log: PR target/48237 * config

[Bug c/48274] New: C frontend emit invalid promotions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48274 Summary: C frontend emit invalid promotions Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu

[Bug c/48274] C frontend emit invalid promotions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48274 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-24 14:01:18 UTC --- Does the target in question define TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES to return true? If so, the front end is behaving as requested by the target - while it would be b

[Bug target/48262] [4.7 Regression] Subversion id 171341 breaks various vectorization files on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-24 14:16:54 UTC --- On powerpc-apple-darwin9, all the tests ran by vect.exp pass with the patches in comments #5 and #6 on top of revision 171367.

[Bug target/42949] ICE: reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:396

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 Ian Bolton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/48250] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48250 Ian Bolton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|u

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-24 14:39:40 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 24 14:39:36 2011 New Revision: 171394 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171394 Log: 2011-03-24 Richard Guenther

[Bug tree-optimization/48271] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_ssa_dominator_optimize (tree-ssa-dom.c:2964) with -O -ftree-vrp -fno-guess-branch-probability -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48271 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-24 14:43:22 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 24 14:43:16 2011 New Revision: 171395 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171395 Log: 2011-03-24 Richard Guenther

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48271] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_ssa_dominator_optimize (tree-ssa-dom.c:2964) with -O -ftree-vrp -fno-guess-branch-probability -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48271 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48274] C frontend emit invalid promotions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48274 --- Comment #2 from Michael Matz 2011-03-24 14:51:08 UTC --- It's x86_64-linux and indeed it does define that hook. Like 19 other targets. This is quite inconvenient. The target should have a say in what instructions are generated (as in

[Bug c/48274] C frontend emit invalid promotions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48274 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/48274] C frontend emit invalid promotions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48274 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-24 15:00:23 UTC --- FYI 2007-07-09 Richard Guenther * decl.c (start_preparsed_function): Do not promote return type.

[Bug middle-end/48269] [4.6 Regression] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 --- Comment #6 from Ri

[Bug target/48262] [4.7 Regression] Subversion id 171341 breaks various vectorization files on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262 --- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-24 15:02:47 UTC --- The vec_extract patches look good. However, I think the movmisalign patch is a band-aid. The exander should call force_reg if the predicates don't match for movmisalign (

[Bug target/42949] ICE: reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:396

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-24 15:13:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > For gcc 4.5 r171282, arm-none-linux-gnueabi, I can run this command without > error: > > arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ ~/investigate/pr42949.i -B.

[Bug objc++/48275] New: getter=namespace failing with .mm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48275 Summary: getter=namespace failing with .mm Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: objc++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gc

[Bug testsuite/48276] New: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276 Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 with -m32 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/48173] [4.6 regression] bootstrap error on arm-linux-gnueabi (defaulting to armv4t)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48173 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1

[Bug target/48273] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in create_copy_of_insn_rtx, at sel-sched-ir.c:5604 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -march=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1

[Bug debug/48253] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Further .debug_aranges issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1

[Bug target/48209] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr47917.c execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209 --- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-24 16:29:24 UTC --- Author: sje Date: Thu Mar 24 16:29:18 2011 New Revision: 171404 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171404 Log: 2011-03-24 Steve Ellcey PR target/48209 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/27357] 20 % increase code size in 4.1 vs 3.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27357 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48209] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr47917.c execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48273] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in create_copy_of_insn_rtx, at sel-sched-ir.c:5604 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -march=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu Status|UNCONF

[Bug target/48273] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in create_copy_of_insn_rtx, at sel-sched-ir.c:5604 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -march=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-03-24 16:46:08 UTC --- (gdb) bt #0 fancy_abort (file=0xd77f00 "../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/sel-sched-ir.c", line=5604, function=0xd78e40 "create_copy_of_insn_rtx") at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c

[Bug target/48273] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in create_copy_of_insn_rtx, at sel-sched-ir.c:5604 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -march=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273 --- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-03-24 16:54:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > -m32 is also needed to trigger this ICE, so i686-pc-linux-gnu. Yes, sorry, originally I tested the code as C++ code, and in that case, -m32 is not needed.

[Bug rtl-optimization/48263] [4.7 Regression]: build fails for cris-elf in libgfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48263 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-24 17:23:22 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Mar 24 17:23:18 2011 New Revision: 171418 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171418 Log: gcc/ PR rtl-optimization/48263

[Bug target/48273] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in create_copy_of_insn_rtx, at sel-sched-ir.c:5604 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -march=core2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 --- Comment #11 from Ira Rosen 2011-03-24 17:32:54 UTC --- Thanks!

[Bug rtl-optimization/48263] [4.7 Regression]: build fails for cris-elf in libgfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48263 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-24 18:46:41 UTC --- > AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf. > given that Mike has approved, > if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64-darwin10, I would think you

[Bug debug/48204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in decimal_to_decnumber, at dfp.c:115 with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48204 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-24 18:59:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 24 18:58:58 2011 New Revision: 171423 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171423 Log: PR debug/48204 * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_c

[Bug c++/48277] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE for g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-1.C on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48277 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE for g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-1.C on powerpc*-*-* Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/48204] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in decimal_to_decnumber, at dfp.c:115 with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48204 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Reg

[Bug target/48262] [4.7 Regression] Subversion id 171341 breaks various vectorization files on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262 --- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-24 19:44:12 UTC --- I was wrong with my previous comment about movmisalign, and both patches look good.

[Bug target/48262] [4.7 Regression] Subversion id 171341 breaks various vectorization files on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-24 20:00:17 UTC --- What about the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01595.html ? Does it come on top of the patches in comments #5 and #6 or does it replace them?

[Bug target/48262] [4.7 Regression] Subversion id 171341 breaks various vectorization files on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262 --- Comment #13 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-24 20:09:06 UTC --- My reading of the patches, is the rs6000 port was broken, and Andrew's two patches fixes this. Richard's patch would have the effect that we wouldn't notice if the two patches are

[Bug c/48278] New: [4.5 Regression] linking results in undefined references to _savegpr_* _restgpr_*_x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48278 Summary: [4.5 Regression] linking results in undefined references to _savegpr_* _restgpr_*_x Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c/48278] [4.5 Regression] linking results in undefined references to _savegpr_* _restgpr_*_x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48278 --- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Denk 2011-03-24 21:18:22 UTC --- See also bug 45053; sorry I missed that.

[Bug fortran/48279] New: segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Summary: segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...

[Bug fortran/48279] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Adrian Prantl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adrian at llnl dot gov --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug c++/48280] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl, have template_decl in check_bases_and_members, at cp/class.c:4695

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48280 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl, have template_decl in check_bases_and_members, at cp/class.c:4695 Product: gcc V

[Bug fortran/48279] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48279] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Adrian Prantl changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker --- Comment #3 from Adrian Prantl

[Bug c++/48281] New: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 Summary: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #1 from Stirling Westrup 2011-03-25 00:41:11 UTC --- Created attachment 23770 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23770 c++ code that was preprocessed to generated previous attachment.

[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #2 from Stirling Westrup 2011-03-25 00:46:02 UTC --- It seems that the preprocessed file that generates the error is 3KB in size, and is being rejected by Bugzilla. How the heck am I supposed to submit it now?

[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-25 00:52:44 UTC --- compress the file e.g. with gzip

[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #4 from Stirling Westrup 2011-03-25 00:57:00 UTC --- Created attachment 23771 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23771 Minimal test case that triggers the error. Okay, I've managed to pare the original code down to t

[Bug c++/48281] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 --- Comment #5 from Stirling Westrup 2011-03-25 00:59:04 UTC --- Created attachment 23772 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23772 Preprocessed version of minimal test case. Here's a preprocessed version of the minimal test case

[Bug c++/48281] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:60

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

  1   2   >