http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48267
Summary: incorrect signed overflow warning when a pointer cannot possibly overflow Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: egg...@gnu.org I ran into this problem when compiling the GNU Emacs trunk with a GCC 4.5.2 that I built on RHEL 5.5 (x86-64). I narrowed it down to the following stripped-down test case. This smells different from the previous bug report I filed in this area (PR48228) on the same platform. When I compile the following program with "gcc -S -Wstrict-overflow -O2" GCC reports "warning: assuming pointer wraparound does not occur when comparing P +- C1 with P +- C2". This warning is incorrect, since signed overflow is obviously impossible in this function: the only pointers computed are head_table and head_table + 1, which are both in range. Changing the "+ 1" to "+ 7" generates even more warnings, though the program is still correct. int head_table[7]; int foo (void) { const int *p; int x = 0; for (p = head_table; p < head_table + 1; p++) x ^= *p; return x; }