http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47370
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47373
Summary: avoid goto table to reduce code size when optimized
for size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
C
>The libstdc++-v3 build also doesn't utilize the profiling flags produced
> in
> a profiledbootstrap or the lto flags produced from an lto-bootstrap.
profiledbootstrap/lto-bootstrap is about FDO/LTO while building compiler, not
runtime.
It would probably make sense for libstdc++-v3 to eventu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47368
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-20 09:19:02 UTC
---
>The libstdc++-v3 build also doesn't utilize the profiling flags produced
> in
> a profiledbootstrap or the lto flags produced from an lto-bootstrap.
profiledbootstrap/lto-bootstra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
09:20:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 23041
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23041
gcc46-pr47283.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #37 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-20
10:21:06 UTC ---
I tested Martin's devirtualization patch at cgraph build. The net result is
decrease of number of indirect calls in libxul by 2. The code size decrease by
about 3KB, so there is probabl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #13 from Vincent Gramoli
2011-01-20 10:28:03 UTC ---
I updated and got the following problem while recompiling. Could it be related
to your recent changes somehow?
gcc -o gnupg/sha1.o -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47167
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-20
10:33:18 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 20 10:33:15 2011
New Revision: 169050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169050
Log:
2011-01-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47167
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-20
10:36:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 20 10:36:29 2011
New Revision: 169051
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169051
Log:
2011-01-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47167
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47371
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #23 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-20
10:41:07 UTC ---
Here is what I understand from this issue.
In this example:
template < typename > class A;
template class TC = A> class
B;
1/ During the fixup of the default argument T of the pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47370
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47368
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
10:43:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Supposedly because libstdc++-v3 is written in C++ and therefore uses
> CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET etc. instead?
Yes, the libstdc++ sources are compiled with CXXC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47368
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
10:45:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 23042
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23042
gcc46-pr47355.patch
Untested fix. Seems ehcleanup assumes nop is used just in the following phi
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47367
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47365
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5.2/4.6 Regression] |[4.5/4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47374
Summary: gcc: Internal error: Erreur de segmentation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47363
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47374
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
--- Comment #4 from Eamon Nerbonne 2011-01-20
11:06:04 UTC ---
Has anyone seen this bug?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
Summary: getlog causes warnings with static linking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
--- Comment #42 from Ion Gaztañaga 2011-01-20
11:52:36 UTC ---
> No, there is no way to do that. Sorry, but you really have to
> re-design this thing to be standard conformant.
Thanks for your detailed report, I was not aware of this problem so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
12:00:56 UTC ---
it might get analysed sooner if you try to reduce the code to something smaller
than 7 lines
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47365
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-20
12:01:23 UTC ---
What happens is that when translating D.2739_9 = b.a[0].i; from bb6 to
bb3 value-numbering does look through the aggregate copy b.a[0] = b.a[1];
continuing to look for b.a[1].i and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46130
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
12:02:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 20 12:02:33 2011
New Revision: 169052
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169052
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46130
* ipa-split.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
12:10:02 UTC ---
It will stop triggering tomorrow, the regex 120 matches
20110120 in date string.
Perhaps the regex could be changed from
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "120" 1 } } */
to something like
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(120,|, 120)" 1 } } */
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47371
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47371
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
12:23:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 23043
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23043
gcc46-pr47371.patch
This seems to fix it for both
RUNTESTFLAGS='i386.exp=headmerge* --target_board=u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47376
Summary: Duplicate member through anonymous unions not reported
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47368
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-20
13:03:31 UTC ---
Should I open an enhancement PR for consistent usage of CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET
with --enable-build-with-cxx? We should have all of the libs build with that
flag under CXX rather than CFLAG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Bonzini 2011-01-20 13:12:02
UTC ---
Indeed, it never occurred to me but it should.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-01-20 13:16:46 UTC ---
I quickly tried to link a C program statically that uses getpwuid_r. It has the
same problem. I guess it is unavoidable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-20
13:38:44 UTC ---
Documentation for getpwuid_r from POSIX:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/getpwuid.html
and for LINUX, which contains a getpwuid_r example:
http://www.kerne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47377
Summary: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:1906
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-20 13:41:02
UTC ---
A different crash:
[hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-11]$ cat x.i
typedef unsigned short ush;
typedef ush Pos;
extern ush prev[];
void fill_window( unsigned more, unsigned m)
{
unsigned n;
for (n =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-20
13:46:14 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 20 13:46:11 2011
New Revision: 169054
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169054
Log:
Fix ix86_delegitimize_address for x32 PIC
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47378
Summary: ld warning linking with libgo.so: relocation bound to
a symbol with STV_PROTECTED visibility
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-20
14:30:50 UTC ---
Vincent, this is bug 47340. I will be looking at this today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47377
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47370
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-20
14:42:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 20 14:42:20 2011
New Revision: 169055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169055
Log:
2011-01-20 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47370
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
15:01:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 23046
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23046
slightly reduced and unincluded testcase
confirmed with 4.5 and 4.6
attachment produced by
g++46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47361
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
Summary: fwprop1 generates bad codes for x32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #15 from Vincent Gramoli
2011-01-20 15:14:21 UTC ---
Thanks!
Vincent
On Jan 20, 2011, at 3:31 PM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
>
> --- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #24 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-20
15:42:17 UTC ---
A candidate fix was posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01381.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
Summary: concept checking and incomplete types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig.
> It works for me with current trunk which suggests this is a duplicate bug
> that was fixed in the meantime. Please re-check with a more recent version.
Yes, I am pretty sure it is dup of the inliner bug I was fixing earlier this
year.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47367
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-20 16:12:10 UTC
---
> It works for me with current trunk which suggests this is a duplicate bug
> that was fixed in the meantime. Please re-check with a more recent version.
Yes, I am pretty sure it is dup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #35 from Michael Matz 2011-01-20 16:36:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 23047
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23047
possible patch
So, this is my current version. I'm creating a different type for top-level
symbols
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47371
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
16:37:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 20 16:37:28 2011
New Revision: 169056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169056
Log:
PR testsuite/47371
* gcc.target/i386/headme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
16:40:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 20 16:40:36 2011
New Revision: 169057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169057
Log:
PR debug/47283
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
Summary: [x32] internal compiler error: in gen_lowpart_general,
at rtlhooks.c:59
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46583
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-20
16:56:30 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Jan 20 16:56:25 2011
New Revision: 169058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169058
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/46583
* tree-ssa-live.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46583
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-20
17:28:54 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 20 17:28:49 2011
New Revision: 169059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169059
Log:
Fix LEA alternative in *add_1/*addsi_1_zext
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||41085
--- Comment #19 from Hans-Pete
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
17:42:17 UTC ---
I'll fix the outdated reference to concepts in the docs though
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47367
Joshua Cogliati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45149
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-20
18:13:40 UTC ---
And thanks for that indeed. By the way, certainly I have no principled
objections to somebody dealing with issues like the one pointed out by Marc,
but only if we are *100%* sure it do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44081
--- Comment #12 from Valeriy 2011-01-20 18:23:29 UTC ---
/*attr_nn.c*/
#include
static void attr_nn(int i1, int *i2, int *i3) __attribute__((__nonnull__(2)));
static void attr_nn(int i1, int *i2, int *i3) {
*i2 = i1;
if (i3 ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Starke
2011-01-20 18:51:53 UTC ---
As this patch also works with gcc 4.5.x I'd like to request this change for the
gcc 4.5 branch as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47367
Joshua Cogliati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-20 18:59:10
UTC ---
Another crash
[hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-13]$ cat x.i
struct foo_t {
int limit;
} foo[3];
void
bar () {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
__builtin_memset (&foo[i], 0, sizeof(*foo));
}
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-20
19:06:05 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 20 19:06:03 2011
New Revision: 169062
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169062
Log:
Use x32_lea_nonmemory_operand on 64bit LEA s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
--- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-20
19:27:27 UTC ---
Know this is not high-priority bug for 4.6.0 but it should be as constexpr is a
new feature and the initial QoI for diagnostics is important for user's first
impressions. Diagnosti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2011-01-20
19:40:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Yes it is, and no, we are not going to "fix" the legacy simulated concepts, we
> are barely keeping the code, for now.
Ok. If it is a "legacy", would you mind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47382
Summary: [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-d-1.C FAILs with
-finline-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
Summary: [x32] Incorrect array access
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #13 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-20
20:04:29 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Jan 20 20:04:25 2011
New Revision: 169063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169063
Log:
2011-01-20 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-20 20:06:45
UTC ---
The testcase is added to the Bionic C library port at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=devel/binutils/hjl/x32.git;a=summary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
Summary: Doesn't indicate failure status when it doesn't
support (attiny2313A)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45261
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||choudary.omar at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
20:12:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Yes it is, and no, we are not going to "fix" the legacy simulated concepts,
> > we
> > are barely keeping the code, for now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
Omar Choudary changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
20:14:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> You didn't think the reference to a first version in 1999 might have been a
> hint those docs were written a long time ago :)
or the fact that the referen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
--- Comment #3 from Omar Choudary 2011-01-20
20:15:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is still a duplicate of the bug you referenced. We don't keep around
> different bug reports for the same bug even if they are reported against
> diffe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45261
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski 2011-01-20
20:16:11 UTC ---
*** Bug 47384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
20:18:32 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 20 20:18:29 2011
New Revision: 169064
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169064
Log:
2011-01-20 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45261
--- Comment #13 from Omar Choudary 2011-01-20
20:20:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 23050
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23050
Patch for gcc version 4.5.2 since the original patch only works for 4.5.1
This patch should be used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2011-01-20
20:29:22 UTC ---
Thank you, the new paragraph is great :-)
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
