http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-01-20 18:13:40 UTC --- And thanks for that indeed. By the way, certainly I have no principled objections to somebody dealing with issues like the one pointed out by Marc, but only if we are *100%* sure it doesn't cause regressions in other cases and that doesn't add more complecity to the tricks (and a lot of time ago we came to the conclusion that some specific issues are essentially unfixable at the library only level, just to be clear)
