http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46815
Summary: Invalid DW_AT_location for a retval instance of a
class that has a virtual function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schulze
2010-12-06 09:07:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This is essentially identical to the patch I provided for
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44617
> so it looks good to me.
I hadn't see that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-06
10:05:11 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 6 10:05:07 2010
New Revision: 167486
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167486
Log:
2010-12-06 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-06
10:08:45 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 6 10:08:43 2010
New Revision: 167487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167487
Log:
2010-12-06 Richard Guenther
PR lto/467
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46540
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-06
10:55:15 UTC ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-12/msg00020.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46543
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-06
10:55:59 UTC ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-12/msg00019.html
TODO:
- Make sure it is included at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46816
Summary: can not compile gcc due to a Fortran configure error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46816
--- Comment #1 from yikey326 at hotmail dot com 2010-12-06 11:22:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 22651
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22651
The file "/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgfortran/config.log"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46816
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46817
Summary: Missing copyright header in libquadmath/*.[hc]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-06
11:37:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 22652
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22652
gcc46-pr46810.patch
Wouldn't something like this fix this? If neither --enable-build-with-cxx is
gi
...@pc379 tmp]$ gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.6.0 20101206 (experimental) [trunk revision 167484]
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Note, that if I concatenate all files into a single one, the ICE is gone.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46819
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46819
Summary: [4.6 Regression] libffi is always built
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-06
11:59:26 UTC ---
would that also address PR 40950 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-06
12:53:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 6 12:53:38 2010
New Revision: 167490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167490
Log:
2010-12-06 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46026
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-06
13:04:11 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Dec 6 13:04:07 2010
New Revision: 167491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167491
Log:
Check in for PR other/46020 was meant for PR oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-06
13:04:11 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Dec 6 13:04:07 2010
New Revision: 167491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167491
Log:
Check in for PR other/46020 was meant for PR oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-06
13:07:15 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 6 13:07:12 2010
New Revision: 167492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167492
Log:
2010-12-06 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46026
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-06
13:11:55 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Dec 6 13:11:51 2010
New Revision: 167493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167493
Log:
Check in for PR other/46020 was meant for PR oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-06
13:11:55 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Dec 6 13:11:51 2010
New Revision: 167493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167493
Log:
Check in for PR other/46020 was meant for PR oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
Summary: Undefined reference errors with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2010-12-06 13:17:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 22655
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22655
Generated code
$ make
/tmp/cckAaCxf.ltrans0.ltrans.o: In function `main':
cckAaCxf.ltrans0.o:(.t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbach
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2010-12-06 13:18:28 UTC ---
"make d" gives segmentation fault in lto_cgraph_replace_node. Like in PR44966,
PR46605.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46821
Summary: swapping empty classes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46821
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2010-12-06
13:25:19 UTC ---
In practice, which semantics would you suggest?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-06
13:26:42 UTC ---
The test in comment #1 compiles with -fno-whole-file, so the regression comes
from -fwhole-file being the default (compiles with r162456, ICE with r166102).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||44945
Summary|[4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-06
13:40:31 UTC ---
Status: Unfixed. See comment 0 for the description.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-06
13:49:25 UTC ---
> Well, then it is probably in a way a duplicate of PR 44945 => Mark this PR as
> depending on PR 44945.
I don't think it is a duplicate of PR 44945, the failure is the same t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46821
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2010-12-06
13:50:45 UTC ---
Calling swap exactly like in the non-empty case? It seems expected to me that
swap be called for each element, and in the usual empty case the compiler
should still be able to optimize i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46821
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46821
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-06
14:04:58 UTC ---
I think Marc's right, tuple::swap is specified to call swap for each element,
and that is definitely something users can detect (even if there's rarely a
good reason to do so for emp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35710
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-06
14:24:15 UTC ---
Iain,
This pr is fixed in trunk. Do you plan to backport it to 4.5 or should I close
it as fixed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46821
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46782
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46782
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-06
14:43:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 22657
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22657
Patch that fixes the bug
This is the patch I'm testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46821
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-06 14:44:46 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Dec 6 14:44:38 2010
New Revision: 167497
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167497
Log:
2010-12-06 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46821
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46804
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-06 14:56:13
UTC ---
There are two likely related failures, but they both need -fno-tree-ter:
gfortran.dg/char_eoshift_[24].f90
$ gfortran -O -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -fgcse -foptimize-register-move
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46822
Summary: printf( "%f" ) segv when called from pthread_once
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46756
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46756
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-06
15:11:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22659
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22659
Patch that fixes both testcases
This is the patch I'm testing. It fixes both testcases, so I'm on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46822
--- Comment #1 from isdmter at gmail dot com 2010-12-06 15:14:45 UTC ---
Oops, I forgot to show my output:
$ ./main
0
0.00
0
Segmentation fault
The first two lines are the first call to f() (directly from the main()),
whereas the last two corr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
Summary: ICE: edge points to wrong declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46815
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-06
15:39:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 22660
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22660
gcc46-pr46815.patch
Ugh. So what happens is that we set DECL_VALUE_EXPR of the NRV optimized var
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Summary: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for
‘operator*’ in
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
kuh3h3 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46726
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46804
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46738
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, patch
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46825
Summary: ICE compiling modules with MinGW build dated 20101204
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46825
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46825
--- Comment #2 from Michael Richmond
2010-12-06 17:04:06 UTC ---
I used gfortran -c g.f90
I did not see this bug in any other port dated 20101204. I did not see it in
any MinGW port prior to 20101204.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43925
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2010-12-06 17:21:51 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Dec 6 17:21:48 2010
New Revision: 167506
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167506
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-07-16 Iain Sandoe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2010-12-06 17:27:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> sdbout.c is broken then.
Quite likely, but I don't understand what it thinks it's trying to do yet
well enough to be sure how.
> If it doesn't care in which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46131
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth 2010-12-06 17:28:43
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Dec 6 17:28:38 2010
New Revision: 167507
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167507
Log:
gcc:
Backport from mainline:
2010-07-23 Ra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46735
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-06 17:30:00 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Dec 6 17:29:56 2010
New Revision: 167508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167508
Log:
PR target/46735
* config/frv/pre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43925
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22654|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46826
Summary: g++ with -O2 may generate infinite loops on x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46826
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46826
pki at ex dot com.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2010-12-06
18:11:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 22652 [details]
> gcc46-pr46810.patch
>
> Wouldn't something like this fix this? If neither --enable-build-with-cxx is
> given, nor --en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46739
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-06 18:15:13 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Dec 6 18:15:09 2010
New Revision: 167509
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167509
Log:
PR target/46739
* config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46740
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-06 19:19:11 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Dec 6 19:19:09 2010
New Revision: 167512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167512
Log:
2010-12-06 Joern Rennecke
Ric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-06
19:28:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 6 19:28:09 2010
New Revision: 167513
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167513
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46777
* cfglayout.c (du
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46771
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-06
19:29:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 6 19:29:38 2010
New Revision: 167514
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167514
Log:
PR debug/46771
* reginfo.c (init_subregs_of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-06
19:30:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 6 19:30:31 2010
New Revision: 167515
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167515
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46528
PR debug/46338
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46338
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-06
19:30:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 6 19:30:31 2010
New Revision: 167515
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167515
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46528
PR debug/46338
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43897
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-06
19:32:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 6 19:31:57 2010
New Revision: 167516
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167516
Log:
PR target/43897
* config/ia64/ia64.c (rtx_n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-06
19:33:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 6 19:33:52 2010
New Revision: 167517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167517
Log:
PR debug/45997
* dwarf2out.c (modified_type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|jakub at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Version|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
Chris Ferguson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fergusoc at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46827
Summary: Heavy use of namespaces leads to cluttered and
difficult to read header files
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-06
20:10:36 UTC ---
> I think the PR can be closed after confirmation that the failure is gone.
OK on the SPARC: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-12/msg00514.html
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46827
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #17 from Chris Litchfield
2010-12-06 20:13:30 UTC ---
All versions since 4.0.0 seem to still have this issue. We are still awaiting
it, and its not assigned to anyone either.
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo