http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-06 18:11:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 22652 [details] > gcc46-pr46810.patch > > Wouldn't something like this fix this? If neither --enable-build-with-cxx is > given, nor --enable-languages contains go, then we shouldn't require C++ > compiler and in that case AC_LANG_PUSH(C++) is wrong. Go should not require a C++ compiler for the first stage either ....
