--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #33 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #26 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-14 22:30 ---
Actually, this is already fixed for 4.2.0! How to mark it as such?
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #67 from ian at airs dot com 2007-05-14 22:35 ---
The patch in comment #65 passes bootstrap and the gcc and libstdc++-v3
testsuites on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.1 |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29496
--- Comment #27 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-14 22:39 ---
Ok, fixed the target milestone.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29496
--- Comment #68 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:39
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] placement new does not change the
dynamic type as it should
On 14 May 2007 21:35:58 -, ian at airs dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #67 from i
--- Comment #68 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-05-14 22:49
---
Audit trail shows that this isn't a problem with 4.2. Target -> 4.1.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071
--- Comment #7 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-05-14 23:11
---
4.2 (RC2, 20070430) also explodes (OOM) with the test case, using -O2.
whereas 4.0.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin8) peaks out at 280 MB (cc1plus), which is
reasonable and typical.
Flag as 4.1/4.2/4.3 regression?
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 23:23 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31926
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-15 00:43 ---
Subject: Bug 31924
Author: janis
Date: Mon May 14 23:43:07 2007
New Revision: 124730
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124730
Log:
libcpp/
PR c/31924
* expr.c (interpret_float_suff
--- Comment #46 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-15 01:35 ---
I've been looking at this again recently. I have a patch that changes dg-error
and dg-warning only for languages that define gcc_error_prefix and
gcc_warning_prefix. I have tested it with C and ensured that tests fo
--- Comment #27 from blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it 2007-05-15 02:36
---
What about actually doing as suggested comment #8? I.e. adding a nice error
message rather than an ICE?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-15 03:38
---
I think the correct place to fix this is in trim. The uninitialized variable
is being passed to the library from trim. Looking at the fdump-tree-original,
you can see that the variable ch is initialized by setti
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-15 05:29 ---
Thanks. If someone with write-access runs the script and tosses the result into
the SVN I'll consider this bug resolved (for me). I changed severity to minor.
The maintainers _might_ want to update the "Makefile maintainer
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-15 05:54 ---
I did some hacking to push the make through and find all occurances of the
problem, then I rebuild from a fresh directory and condensed my changes.
It came down to a few problems all interacting together - changes and upda
I compiled gcc with java as one of the languages,
--enable-languages=...,java,...
$xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-cygwin
Configured with: /cygdrive/C/makecygwin/gcc-4_2-branch/configure --verbose
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,fortran,java,objc,obj-c++ --with-tune=athlon-xp
--prefix=/
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-15 06:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=13556)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13556&action=view)
Log of testsuite failures on Cygwin - 1,000 KB
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31928
--- Comment #10 from elizabeth dot l dot yip at boeing dot com 2007-05-15
07:48 ---
The following code exposes the problem relating to conjg(transpose(.)), with
which gfortran returns the wrong answer. If we break conjg(transpose(.)) into
two lines, then we can get the right answer.
I
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo