[Bug c/22458] [3.4 regression] ICE on missing brace

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 07:25 --- Testing a patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsa

Templates and namespaces: such an order of headers causes the compiler error (gcc 3.4.3 and later)

The attached archive .tgz contains all necessary to repeat this compile bug. Error disappears if one exchange the order of two headers in Request.cpp. See README file for details. Note: earlier versions of gcc compile it always successfully. Tested compilers generate the error: gcc 3.4.3, 3.4.4

[Bug fortran/20541] TR 15581: ALLOCATABLE components

--- Additional Comments From post at tillmann-wegst dot de 2005-07-29 08:21 --- I found that code containing allocatable fields in type statements compiles without complaints using "g95", so I was a bit perplex when moving to gfortran and getting the same error as reported here. Cons

[Bug middle-end/21766] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-cygwin

--- Additional Comments From rmorganl at u dot washington dot edu 2005-07-29 08:45 --- Mainline is still broken for cygwin as of the gcc-4.1-20050723 snapshot. Applying patch-rev3.diff (with failing hunks applied by hand) seems to fix the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug tree-optimization/23126] New: VRP propagates abs incorrectly

VRP miscompiles the following testcase at -O2: #include void test(int x) { if (x < -3) abort(); if (x > 5) abort(); if (abs(x) != 1) abort(); } int main() { test(1); test(-1); return 0; } The t27.v

[Bug tree-optimization/23127] New: VRP propagates negation of antirange incorrectly

VRP miscompiles the following testcase at -O2: #include void test(int x) { if (x == 1) abort(); else { int a = -x; if (a != 1) abort(); } } int main() { test(-1); return 0; }

[Bug tree-optimization/23128] New: VRP fails for unsigned values

VRP miscompiles the following testcase at -O2 (on a machine with 32-bit ints): #include void test(unsigned int a, unsigned int b) { if (a < 5) abort(); if (b < 5) abort(); if (a + b != 0) abort(); } int main() { uns

[Bug rtl-optimization/23117] [4.1 Regression] ICE on valid code while building libgcc

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 09:32 --- Subject: Bug 23117 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 09:32:16 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog sched-rgn.c Log message:

[Bug rtl-optimization/23117] [4.1 Regression] ICE on valid code while building libgcc

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 09:33 --- Fixed with suggested patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

-- Bug 17808 depends on bug 23117, which changed state. Bug 23117 Summary: [4.1 Regression] ICE on valid code while building libgcc http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23117 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug rtl-optimization/17428] internal compiler error: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:1880 (-fspeculative-prefetching)

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 09:41 --- The testcases from comment #4 and comment #12 were fixed on the 4.0 branch. The problem persisted on mainline where -fspeculative-prefetching had to be added. Since -fspeculative-prefetching was removed yes

[Bug rtl-optimization/17491] -fspeculative-prefetching fails on powerpc-*

-- Bug 17491 depends on bug 17428, which changed state. Bug 17428 Summary: internal compiler error: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:1880 (-fspeculative-prefetching) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17428 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/23129] New: VRP propagates division of antiranges incorrectly

VRP miscompiles the following testcase at -O2: #include void test(int x, int y) { int c; if (x == 1) abort(); if (y == 1) abort(); c = x / y; if (c != 1) abort(); } int main() { test(2, 2); } The t27.vrp dump shows what happens: ... c_3: ~[

[Bug fortran/22502] [4.0.1/4.1 Regression] ICE constructing arrays with "(/ /)"

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 09:54 --- Steven, your patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-07/msg01042.html seems to fix this PR on mainline. Is this an appropriate fix for the 4.0 branch, too? Would you mind adding a testcase? Btw, your pa

[Bug target/14300] -pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on alpha-linux

--- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 10:56 --- This is a special case of bug 20705. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14300

[Bug driver/20705] -pthread should enable all options required to use pthreads on all platforms

--- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 10:58 --- Also see bug 14300 for Alpha Linux. -- What|Removed |Added BugsTh

[Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT

--- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 11:02 --- This bug is not invalid; it is a special case of bug 20705. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865

[Bug tree-optimization/23129] [4.1 regression] VRP propagates division of antiranges incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:08 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||reichelt

[Bug bootstrap/23131] New: Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

A cross-compiler configured with (for example) .../configure --target=arm-elf --with-headers=.../newlib/libc/include --with-newlib No-longer builds on some host systems because fixincludes is now scanning /usr/include rather than the headers specified. I suspect this is related to the sysroot c

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 11:25 --- The option inconsistency between platforms is bug 20705. I agree there should be a #define that says whether POSIX threads are usable (rather than just supported by the platform),

[Bug tree-optimization/23126] [4.1 Regression] VRP propagates abs incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:26 --- Fixed already in 20050729, most likely by: 2005-07-27 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR tree-optimization/22493 * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_unary_expr): Deal with -fwra

[Bug c++/23132] New: Array delete'd through base class causes access violation in prog

When an array of derived objects is deleted through its base class, the resulting program seg faults. Could this be caused by destructor iteration with invalid pointers? Reproduced on gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (cygwin special), egcs-2.91.66 (red hat 6.2), g++ (GCC) 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. bui

[Bug java/22460] GCJ produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR (from byte-code)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:28 --- Fixed applied. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLV

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- Bug 22368 depends on bug 22460, which changed state. Bug 22460 Summary: GCJ produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR (from byte-code) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22460 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug tree-optimization/23126] [4.1 Regression] VRP propagates abs incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:29 --- James, You want to apply this testcase as an example of something which VRP miscompiled? -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/23127] [4.1 Regression] VRP propagates negation of antirange incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:29 --- Fixed in 20050729 already by: 2005-07-27 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR tree-optimization/22493 * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_unary_expr): Deal with -fwra

[Bug tree-optimization/23128] [4.1 Regression] VRP fails for unsigned values

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:31 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||phython at

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|Fixincludes on cross-build |[4.1 Regression] Fixincludes |is scanning /usr/include|on cross-build is scanning

[Bug rtl-optimization/17491] -fspeculative-prefetching fails on powerpc-*

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:39 --- -fspeculative-prefetching has now been removed from the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/17950] Over Aggressive Use of Data Cache Touch Instructions During FDO

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:42 --- -fspeculative-prefetching has now been removed from the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug driver/20705] -pthread should enable all options required to use pthreads on all platforms

--- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 11:46 --- -pthread is apparently deprecated on FreeBSD (see and

[Bug c++/23132] Array delete'd through base class causes access violation in prog

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:47 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22609 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/22609] delete [] called on base virtual destructor class [Segmentation failed]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:47 --- *** Bug 23132 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/15050] Compiled templated code crashes on delete []

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:48 --- Reopening to ... -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOP

[Bug c++/15050] Compiled templated code crashes on delete []

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:49 --- Mark as a dup of bug 22609. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22609 *** -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/22609] delete [] called on base virtual destructor class [Segmentation failed]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:49 --- *** Bug 15050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 11:58 --- suggests defining __GNUC_THREADMODEL__ to a string specifying the thread model. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug c++/22003] [4.1 Regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition and thunks

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:20 --- My reduced testcase no longer ICEs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22003

[Bug tree-optimization/21559] [4.1 Regression] missed jump threading

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21559

[Bug c++/23132] Array delete'd through base class causes access violation in prog

--- Additional Comments From jorik dot dewit at gmail dot com 2005-07-29 12:29 --- (In reply to comment #1) > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22609 *** Sorry about reporting a duplicate. I had looked/searched. Maybe the default settings for the query form should include

[Bug middle-end/22509] [4.1 regression] elemental.f90 testsuite failure (-fweb)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:38 --- This is a -fweb latent bug. If you do -O3 -fweb -funroll-loops on the 4.0 branch it also fails. I have a patch which seems to work around the bug but also causes cost model of address models to be diffe

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:39 --- It seems we've dealt with all the fall-out now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17808

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:40 --- Should a separate PR be opened requesting __GCC_PTHREADS__, so this PR can focus on whether _REENTRANT should be defined unconditionally and discussion of an alternative macro can take place separately? I have

[Bug tree-optimization/23133] New: recip does not factor division by function parameter

The following testcase, compiled with -O2 -ffast-math should have 1/d factored out, but doesn't, because d is a function parameter and recip walks SSA_NAME defs, and d does not have one. double a, b; int x; double foo(double d) { if (x) a/=d; return a/d + b/d; } -- Summary: r

[Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:36 --- Subject: Bug 22284 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 13:35:59 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/libsu

[Bug tree-optimization/23134] New: Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape

Take this "stupid" example (even though this most likely shows up in GCC but I don't know for sure): int g1(int); static void h(int *a) { *a = 1; } int g(void) { int t = 0; h(&t); int t1 = t; g1(t1); return t1 == t; } That return should have been turned into "return 1" as t does not es

[Bug tree-optimization/23134] Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23134

[Bug rtl-optimization/19767] [3.4 only] CSE hang on very simple code with -O2 -ftracer

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:43 --- Testing a patch -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsan

[Bug tree-optimization/23133] recip does not factor division by function parameter

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:45 --- Confirmed, another testcase (which might be needed as the redundant load of a and b are not done): double a, b; int x; double foo(double d) { double a1 = a, b1 = b; if (x) a1/=d; return (a1/d) *

[Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:50 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/23134] Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2005-07-29 13:57 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/23133] recip does not factor division by function parameter

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:28 --- I have a patch for this. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:45 --- Since you're not using --with-sysroot or --with-build-sysroot, I'm slightly surprised. What is SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR in your generated gcc/Makefile? Is it $(CROSS_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR), $(NATIVE_SYSTEM_HEADER_DI

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:53 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 15:45, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > What is SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR in your generated

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:54 --- I understand what's causing this; patch coming soon. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23131

[Bug tree-optimization/23127] [4.1 Regression] VRP propagates negation of antirange incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:59 --- I already commited testcases for this one and 23126. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23127

[Bug target/21723] [4.0 Regression] ICE while building libgfortran

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 15:08 --- Subject: Bug 21723 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 15:08:45 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug middle-end/23135] New: find_reloads_toplev -> find_reloads_subreg_address uses wrong reload type

I've added a movti expander to sh.md, and found a regression for -m4 -ml on simd-1.c with optimization options -O1, -O2, -O3 and -Os . I've foun that a output reload address was being overwritten by a secondary output reload. The secondary output reload had RELOAD_FOR_OUTPUT_ADDRESS, and the addres

[Bug middle-end/23135] find_reloads_toplev -> find_reloads_subreg_address uses wrong reload type

--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 15:29 --- Created an attachment (id=9385) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9385&action=view) context & patch These are the patches that exposed the latent bug for sh-elf, together with the reload

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:01 --- Created an attachment (id=9386) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9386&action=view) Proposed patch Richard -- I've tested this patch and believe it correct. I'm running tests in more co

[Bug middle-end/23135] find_reloads_toplev -> find_reloads_subreg_address uses wrong reload type

-- What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2005- |

[Bug target/23136] New: arm-none-eabi doesn't build anymore

The arm-none-eabi build prematurely terminates with a segfault while compiling crtstuff.c. Here is a reduced testcase. extern void abort (void) __attribute__((noreturn)); void foo (int a) { if (a) abort (); } According to our (CodeSourcery's) automated tester, this must have been caused b

[Bug target/19421] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with soft-float on m68k

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.0.0 |4.0.0 4.0.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421

[Bug target/23136] arm-none-eabi doesn't build anymore

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:24 --- I think this is a dup of bug 23117. Which was fixed by: 2005-07-29 Richard Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR rtl-optimization/23117 * sched-r

[Bug target/23136] arm-none-eabi doesn't build anymore

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:31 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23117 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/23117] [4.1 Regression] ICE on valid code while building libgcc

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:31 --- *** Bug 23136 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:32 --- Subject: Bug 22550 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 16:32:01 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfgcleanup.c

[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:38 --- Fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01971.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 17:33 --- Yes, that's fixed the problem, thanks. Builds now complete ok (testing still in progress). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23131

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-

[Bug c++/23137] New: Difficulty accessing base template members from derived template

The piece of code attached compiled without errors under gcc 3.3.3 (Red Hat Linux), but failed with 3.4.2 (Windows XP) and 3.4.3 (Solaris 2.8). The information that I am sending in this report all pertains to 3.4.3 on Solaris. But I also installed a version of Dev-C++ which installs on Windows

[Bug c++/23137] Difficulty accessing base template members from derived template

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 18:14 --- Read the release notes for 3.4. This is invalid code. -- What|Removed |Added St

[Bug c++/16240] [3.4/3.5 ABI Regression] g++ generates incorrect mangled name

--- Additional Comments From uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2005-07-29 18:16 --- I belive, till g++ 3.3.4, the mangled string used have that '_' as hown by following example, template struct S { S(int i=0); }; template &s> void f13(); extern S s13; int main(void) { f13();

[Bug middle-end/21720] GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 18:31 --- It turns out my patch actually fixed a similar problem with the code handling digits before the ".", and my testcase didn't have enough zeroes to show the problem on 64-bit hosts. Testing a patch to fix the p

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

-- Bug 16989 depends on bug 21720, which changed state. Bug 21720 Summary: GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21720 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/23138] New: real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)

Hi all, I'd like to report what looks like a bug in gfortran for Windows, version: "GNU F95 version 4.1.0 20050702 (experimental) (i686-pc-mingw32)" It concerns values of type real, which both print and add incorrectly. To give an example, take this little program: ---

[Bug libfortran/23138] real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 18:54 --- I cannot reproduce this with 20050729 on i686-pc-linux-gnu. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/23138] real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)

--- Additional Comments From post at tillmann-wegst dot de 2005-07-29 19:01 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I cannot reproduce this with 20050729 on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Yes, Steve Kargl has told me the same. The bug appears to be particular with the MinGW-version. -- h

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:20 --- Subject: Bug 23131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 19:20:49 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog configure.ac configure Lo

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:24 --- Fixed in GCC 4.1. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:27 --- Subject: Bug 23131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: csl-3_4_3-linux-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 19:27:12 Modified files: gcc

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:28 --- Subject: Bug 23131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: csl-3_4_3-linux-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 19:28:31 Modified files: .

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:29 --- Subject: Bug 23131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: csl-arm-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 19:29:16 Modified files: . : Change

[Bug middle-end/21990] Wrong code for 4.0 and head: Reload clobbers the frame pointer by using it as spill register without recognizing the clobbering

--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de 2005-07-29 20:06 --- Hi, a couple of weeks after identifying this issue, I have continued working with 4.0.0. I never observed a similar failure in our production code. The issue seems to be strongly linked to the con

[Bug c++/23139] New: -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

Using the command line switches -pedantic -ffast-math triggers an error and aborts compilation of code using HUGE_VAL. To reproduce, save the following code as huge.cpp: #include #include int main(int argc,char **argv) { double v = HUGE_VAL; printf("%f\n",v); return 0; } Compile with:

[Bug c++/23140] New: void warning on virtual classes with no destructor

If compiled with -Wall, g++-4.0.1 will warn on classes with virtual functions but *no* destructor at all. Note that even though this warning is well justified on classes implementing a destructor - because virtual classes might get deleted thru a base class pointer - this warning is not useful for

[Bug c++/23139] -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:06 --- Can you attach the preprocessing source as the glibc I have installed defineds HUGE_VAL as __builtin_huge_val(). -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/21720] GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:14 --- Subject: Bug 21720 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 21:14:22 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog real.c gcc/testsui

[Bug c++/23140] void warning on virtual classes with no destructor

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:14 --- Actually this was a requested thing for 4.0, see PR 11624. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11624 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/11624] -Wnon-virtual-dtor doesn't always work

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:14 --- *** Bug 23140 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/23139] -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

--- Additional Comments From thor at math dot tu-berlin dot de 2005-07-29 21:14 --- As per request, here is the preprocessed source code: int main(int argc,char **argv) { double v = (__extension__ 0x1.0p2047); printf("%f\n",v); return 0; } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug c++/23139] -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:18 --- Hmm, if passed in 4.0.0 20050225 but fails on the mainline. It also works with the C front-end. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23139

[Bug c++/23139] -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

--- Additional Comments From thor at math dot tu-berlin dot de 2005-07-29 21:18 --- Subject: Re: -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 > 21:06 --- > Can you atta

[Bug target/23078] [4.0 regression] m68k ICE

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-29 21:59 --- I consider this fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVE

[Bug target/23080] [4.0 regression] m68k ICE

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-29 22:00 --- I consider this fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVE

[Bug ada/23141] New: ACATS FAIL c45651a fixed point wrong code

Started failing between LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 26 21:49:55 UTC 2005 LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jul 29 20:05:56 UTC 2005 on x86 and amd64-linux. ,.,. C45651A ACATS 2.5 05-07-29 23:43:34 C45651A CHECK THAT, FOR FIXED POINT TYPES, THE ABS OPERATOR PRODUCES CORRECT RESULTS - BASIC TYPES.

[Bug ada/23142] New: ACATS FAIL cxaa017 character processing wrong code

Started failing between LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 26 21:49:55 UTC 2005 LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jul 29 20:05:56 UTC 2005 on x86 and amd64-linux. ,.,. CXAA017 ACATS 2.5 05-07-30 00:03:57 CXAA017 Check that Ada.Text_IO subprograms Look_Ahead and Get_Immediate are available and produce co

[Bug tree-optimization/23046] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:191

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-07-29 22:20 --- waiting for testcase... -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITI

[Bug ada/23141] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL c45651a fixed point wrong code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 22:20 --- I think this is a VRP bug, but I could be wrong. It might also be a fold-const bug. -- What|Removed |Added -

  1   2   >