http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-24
19:50:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Works with -fno-realloc-lhs -- thus, it should be one of the recently fixed
> > 4.6/4.7 regressions.
> Can this be closed, then?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-21
22:55:33 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 I get the segmentation fault with 4.6 r169227 and
170921, but not with trunk r172845 nor with 4.5.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
Summary: gfortran crash
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060
Summary: gfortran crash when referencing procedure pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103
--- Comment #23 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-03 16:06 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> fix almost all the warning by check_po.
>
> I don't know the grammer of error_print, but I think the following two places
> are valid. am I right?
I think they are OK.
check_po is reall
--- Comment #22 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-03 14:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=15572)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15572&action=view)
check_po log for all .mo files in debian gcc-4.3-locales package
debian gcc-4.3-locales version is 4.3.0-3
and I
--- Comment #21 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-03 14:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=15570)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15570&action=view)
2nd zh_CN.po, compressed by bzip2
fix almost all the warning by check_po.
I don't know the grammer of error_print
--- Comment #20 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-03 14:07 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I had none, but now I wrote a very basic one, which misses several checks and
> gives false positives. I put the Perl script at
> http://physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/tmp/check_po
FX, I th
--- Comment #19 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-03 13:55 ---
> PS. in emacs's po-mode, po-validate does not warning in this case, any script
> to check this po file?
I had none, but now I wrote a very basic one, which misses several checks and
gives false positives. I put the
--- Comment #18 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2008-05-03 13:14 ---
It works fine.thanks!
msgfmt -o gcc.mo gcc-4.3.0.zh_CN.po
mv gcc.mo /gcc-4.4/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/
gfortran cputime.f90;./a.out
the result:
0.55
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103
--- Comment #17 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-03 12:47 ---
an updated (again) zh_CN.po uploaded to TP[1], and also in attachment[2], it
really protect my gfotran-4.3 from crash, I hope it can works for you.
please help check whether it works for you?
thanks.
[1] http://trans
--- Comment #16 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-03 12:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=15567)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15567&action=view)
new zh_CN.po, compressed by bzip2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103
--- Comment #15 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2008-05-03 11:05 ---
also crashed.
would MR lidaobing work at gcc's svn version ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103
--- Comment #14 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-02 18:50 ---
an updated zh_CN.po uploaded to TP[1], please help check whether it can fix
this bug.
PS. in emacs's po-mode, po-validate does not warning in this case, any script
to check this po file?
thanks.
[1] http://translatio
--- Comment #13 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 17:34
---
GCC translation bug reports are taken care of by the translation project
(http://translationproject.org/). I have sent a mail to the chinese team
coordinator (LI Daobing) and GCC translation maintainer (Meng Jie)
#x27;%s' at %L is not a function"
msgstr
"%2L处的%1$s不是一个函数"
Here, a '$' is missing.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--------
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 13:44 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> The problem is surely in http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/po/zh_TW.po
I meant: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/po/zh_CN.po
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-05-02 13:40:05
date||
Summary|gfortra
I'm not going to get into registering to submit a bug in the formal way,
I am trying urgently to get some quick and dirty results.
But the gfortran compiler told me to report a bug, so I am doing so
Command line
[EMAIL PROTECTED] QDPfig]# gfortran -o contour_fun
contour_fun.f90
Error message
26 matches
Mail list logo
