------- Comment #23 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-03 16:06 -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> fix almost all the warning by check_po.
>
> I don't know the grammer of error_print, but I think the following two places
> are valid. am I right?
I think they are OK.
check_po is really something quickly written. I'm sure it misses problems and
it will (like your example) find things which are OK. (But checking a dozen
lines is easier than checking all lines in the .po file.)
(In reply to comment #18)
> It works fine.thanks!
I close it than as FIXED. Note: It might take a while until the corrected .po
file is checked in.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103
