https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The patch regressions tests OK. I dont know how to do a test case that requires
two files to compile. I am looking through the test suite for the incantations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120111
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
metric ton
> of errors building the stage2 libgcc.
Native m68k bootstrap with LRA works for me with just C/C++. M2, Fortran and
JIT fail for various reasons, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682678.html
I suggest we switch m68k to LRA, so we can close this bug report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Cannot rename chain v30 (8) at insn 54 (mark_read)
Creating chain v29 (13) at insn 54
Cannot rename chain v29 (13) at insn 30 (mark_read)
Widening register in chain v29 (13) at insn 30
Cannot rename chain v3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] RISC-V: |[15 Regression] RISC-V:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05d75c5bfcf923bc0258b79a08c5861590c5a2b9
commit r16-394-g05d75c5bfcf923bc0258b79a08c5861590c5a2b9
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon May 5 17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Some debugging info:
949 /* Search the chain where this instruction is (one of) the
root. */
950 dest_op_info = insn_rr[INSN_UID (insn)].op_info;
951 dest_regno = R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unfortunately the 14 patch regresses
+FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/named-constants-via-macros-traditional.c (test
for warnings, line 13)
+FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/named-constants-via-macros-traditional.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116880
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b69209936680dabbb7bbe08e71646a2c25ece0bf
commit r14-11740-gb69209936680dabbb7bbe08e71646a2c25ece0bf
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b69209936680dabbb7bbe08e71646a2c25ece0bf
commit r14-11740-gb69209936680dabbb7bbe08e71646a2c25ece0bf
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98935
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98935
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd0d98c9f8f45c496bc2d0d0b6bda4fefcf9a6a
commit r14-11738-gbcd0d98c9f8f45c496bc2d0d0b6bda4fefcf9a6a
Author: Iain Sandoe
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116793
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4000f922425f7763bdab7bb8822975c0a669097
commit r14-11737-gb4000f922425f7763bdab7bb8822975c0a669097
Author: Arsen Arsenov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102253
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116502
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:694b942a179f5fbaee882a5e619e5bbaf64b4d11
commit r14-11735-g694b942a179f5fbaee882a5e619e5bbaf64b4d11
Author: Arsen Arsenovi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115905
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115905
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb600ecb6af628e492fb86dee50cda049ac708e3
commit r14-11733-geb600ecb6af628e492fb86dee50cda049ac708e3
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682674.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87778
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61300|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target|aarch64-poky-lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61331
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61331&action=edit
Reduced as far as I can get it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106973
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 61330
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61330&action=edit
Patch for comment#2
This patch fixes the checking of the references, so that inquiry references
of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61329
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61329&action=edit
gcc16-pr120061.patch
Trunk version of the same patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61328
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61328&action=edit
gcc14-pr120061.patch
Untested 14 branch version of the patch which fixes all 3 tests (though none
included, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
--- Comment #4 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Bisect bad commit: r15-5422-g279475fd7236a9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106973
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74cfbedd24cfc4bb26b33bdb0b7c55a9139cd757
commit r14-11732-g74cfbedd24cfc4bb26b33bdb0b7c55a9139cd757
Author: Arsen Arsenov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a275b5bebdf7746af590fa57378cd48cb8e679a
commit r14-11731-g5a275b5bebdf7746af590fa57378cd48cb8e679a
Author: Arsen Arsenovi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116482
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2fa7e036e72fa0ed63df602cebd4005b078336e
commit r14-11730-gb2fa7e036e72fa0ed63df602cebd4005b078336e
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122
Bug ID: 120122
Summary: [14/15/16 Regression] wrong code due to VCE of bool
being pulled out of loop
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113457
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unfortunately
--- libcpp/files.cc.jj 2025-05-03 11:02:02.502647404 +0200
+++ libcpp/files.cc 2025-05-05 21:09:18.042680877 +0200
@@ -1006,14 +1006,6 @@ _cpp_stack_file (cpp_reader *pfile, _cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113457
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:805b9914846a1228b84a3c3dd8f9ba2f21f9ff59
commit r14-11729-g805b9914846a1228b84a3c3dd8f9ba2f21f9ff59
Author: Arsen Arsenov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110635
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110635
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4042cecd6245dc773fc150d5fd839968674e4500
commit r14-11728-g4042cecd6245dc773fc150d5fd839968674e4500
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102051
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102051
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce3f523f9cb4c20704bc5f41b8fbc34b5b84ed88
commit r14-11727-gce3f523f9cb4c20704bc5f41b8fbc34b5b84ed88
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109682
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109682
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b3addb6fe05a80d5e043fbb12cc9c0cc426b0e6
commit r14-11726-g1b3addb6fe05a80d5e043fbb12cc9c0cc426b0e6
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98364636c194398d5dccb477e5405cb1d02a55f1
commit r14-11725-g98364636c194398d5dccb477e5405cb1d02a55f1
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, my understanding of what's going on on the #c11 vs. #c12 vs.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr120067-2.c.jj2024-09-17 09:04:10.523093614
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr120067-2.c 2025-05-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120111
--- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
This is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052
which you submitted. I don't have 15.1 installed, so cannot
confirm whether or not the patch made it into 15.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Pinski ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 113852 ***
#9 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120019
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
from Patrick Palka ---
*** Bug 120056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Lets close this one as a dup of the earlier reported PR119714
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 119714 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121
--- Comment #5 from Stefano ---
>From a *user perspective*, this is unexpected behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Stefano from comment #2)
> > @Andrew Pinski: I can't follow. Did you see my second example with the
> > compilation error? They are semantically equ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Stefano from comment #2)
> @Andrew Pinski: I can't follow. Did you see my second example with the
> compilation error? They are semantically equivalent and both produce the
> same assembly outpu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120019
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c182f4d14d65b3e012ad65b5014d86352fabc86f
commit r16-393-gc182f4d14d65b3e012ad65b5014d86352fabc86f
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121
--- Comment #2 from Stefano ---
@Andrew Pinski: I can't follow. Did you see my second example with the
compilation error? They are semantically equivalent and both produce the same
assembly output.
So, why is there an error produced in the seco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120121
Bug ID: 120121
Summary: Comparison of integer expressions of different
signedness not detected
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120
Bug ID: 120120
Summary: gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to
gcc-15
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080
--- Comment #9 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Created attachment 61324
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61324&action=edit
improved reduction.c
Andrew's reduction modified for reproducing on latest trunk, fortunately not
much h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|[1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080
--- Comment #8 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Since r16-372-g064cac730f88dc Andrew's reduction does not cause an error on my
computer. I haven't checked the original file after this revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
--- Comment #1 from Khem Raj ---
Just
-O2 -mcpu=cortex-a57+crc
is enough to reproduce the ICE, it works with -O1 or -Os
with -O2 it only works without -mcpu=cortex-a57+crc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119
Bug ID: 120119
Summary: [15 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 segfaults compiling
VK-GL-CTS on aarch64/musl target
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120117
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
May 5 18:16:20 2025 +0100
PR modula2/120117: ICE when attempting to obtain the MAX of an aliased set
type
The ICE occurred because of a bug in M2GenGCC.mod:FoldBecomes which
attempted to remove the same quadruple twice. Thereafter cc1gm2
generated an erroneous error type error as
|RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 107845 ***
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120109 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120109
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[12/13/14/15 regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The original issue (comment#0) is fixed with the fix for pr119986,
but the other issue in comment#2 still remains.
It looks like gfc_conv_intrinsic_transfer gets confused by the inquiry ref.
|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 81276 ***
from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 90260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61322
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61322&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
I did a quick test with the patch and compile.exp had no failures on x86_64.
Will do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
>
> But nowhere in simplify-rtx.cc checks that gen_lowpart_no_emit will return
> CLOBBER. Or should we wrap gen_lowpart_for_combine and return NULL when it
> is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120118
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 79516 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
--- Comment #8 from Dimitar Dimitrov ---
Posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/682657.html . I'm
trying to setup gcc testing environment for big endian target, in order to
check Richard's comment:
> But we would have to skip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120118
Bug ID: 120118
Summary: ICE in c and c++ in cpp_spell_token with unterminated
macro stringification inside #pragma message
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
before:(and:SI (subreg:SI (unspec:QI [
(mem:V8HI (reg/f:SI 98 [ pi128.0_1 ]) [0 *pi128.0_1+0 S16
A128])
(reg:V8HI 110 [ _16 ])
(const_int 0 [0])
]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61321
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61321&action=edit
reduced test which show the kmov
This removes the other functions and leaves one which shows the issue.
ause of a bug in M2GenGCC.mod:FoldBecomes which attempted
to remove the same quadruple twice. Thereafter cc1gm2 generated an erroneous
error type error as PCSymBuild did not skip an aliased set type. The type of
the const was set incorrectly (as a set type) rather than the type of the set
elemen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f285b7ad7cb89a9b29b52e0d25a7666dc9bd645
commit r16-391-g7f285b7ad7cb89a9b29b52e0d25a7666dc9bd645
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120117
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120117
Bug ID: 120117
Summary: ICE when attempting to obtain the MAX of an aliased
set type.
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120111
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120054
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcc74146e3e0bfd30f9ccc12359991d73fe928f9
commit r16-390-gfcc74146e3e0bfd30f9ccc12359991d73fe928f9
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Mon May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120090
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Before we could do this
```
Trying 15 -> 16:
15: {r121:SI=zero_extend(unspec[[r98:SI],r112:V8HI,0]
157);r115:QI=unspec[[r98:SI],r112:V8HI,0] 157;}
REG_DEAD r112:V8HI
REG_DEAD r98:SI
16: r12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68331
Bug 68331 depends on bug 119973, which changed state.
Bug 119973 Summary: [15 Regression] Wrong code at -O1 -fipa-pta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119973
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68331
Bug 68331 depends on bug 120006, which changed state.
Bug 120006 Summary: [15 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fipa-pta on
util-linux's mount
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120006
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.1.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119973
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||15.1.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119973
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b36014e10c95d3ada1dcdf4695626af90fba0a99
commit r15-9621-gb36014e10c95d3ada1dcdf4695626af90fba0a99
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120006
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:169ad482497ae9c672a825050b8f4b6d54cd5d24
commit r15-9622-g169ad482497ae9c672a825050b8f4b6d54cd5d24
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61319
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61319&action=edit
gcc14-pr120061.patch.xz
Testcase for this PR (which worked before r14-11679-g8a884140c2bcb7 and doesn't
work
1 - 100 of 281303 matches
Mail list logo
