[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-09 08:45:01 UTC --- > For reference ACATS is now clean on arm-linux as well: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00648.html > > LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 7 00:49:12 UTC 2011 (revision 168

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #17 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-01-08 22:48:51 UTC --- For reference ACATS is now clean on arm-linux as well: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00648.html LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 7 00:49:12 UTC 2011 (revision 168562) Nati

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-05 16:55:57 UTC --- > Regarding the ten "stack-check" tests as I can them (c5210[3x,4x,4y], > cb1010[a,c,d], null_deref[1,2], stack-check[1,2]), I now understand that > it is expected that these tests

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #15 from John Marino 2011-01-05 16:25:56 UTC --- [off PR] Hi Eric, Can you clarify one statement? Regarding the ten "stack-check" tests as I can them (c5210[3x,4x,4y], cb1010[a,c,d], null_deref[1,2], stack-check[1,2]), I now underst

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-05 15:33:24 UTC --- > The regression tests just completed for OpenBSD i386. > There is one failure on ACATS (cb1010a timeout)* This is a stack checking test. > 3) the STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN macro

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #13 from John Marino 2011-01-05 15:14:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Thanks for confirming. ACATS is clean on both i386 and i586 Linux SJLJ now, > are there any remaining failures on BSD platforms? There are no ACATS or gnat

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-05 13:54:30 UTC --- > ACATS 62002a now passes, thanks. Thanks for confirming. ACATS is clean on both i386 and i586 Linux SJLJ now, are there any remaining failures on BSD platforms?

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #11 from John Marino 2011-01-05 13:49:47 UTC --- I rebuilt OpenBSD i386 using then Jan 5 daily bump (SVN 168495) and patched it with tree-src.c file. ACATS 62002a now passes, thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-05 11:23:43 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jan 5 11:23:40 2011 New Revision: 168508 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168508 Log: PR tree-optimization/47005 * tree-sra.c

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/47005] [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Component|ada