http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-05 15:33:24 UTC --- > The regression tests just completed for OpenBSD i386. > There is one failure on ACATS (cb1010a timeout)* This is a stack checking test. > 3) the STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN macro value has no effect on OpenBSD. I was > expecting failures on c5210[3x,4x,4y] and cb1010[a,b,c] but they don't fail. The tests should pass w and w/o it on x86, but it's better to define it. > 4) Despite DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO being set to 0 (meaning MD_UNWIND_SUPPORT macro > is ignored), the null_deref and stack_check gnat.dg tests pass. in gdb, the > segfault comes and then the program just exits normally. This is expected with SJLJ exceptions, you don't need MD_UNWIND_SUPPORT. > The summary is that the OpenBSD port is currently better then it has ever > been, > and one remaining ACATS failure is probably related to how OpenBSD handles > their stack. As of today, I don't have any errors to report, but that may > change as I discover more about the issues I just outlined above. Great, thanks for the detailed report.
