[Bug tree-optimization/107043] range information not used in popcount

2023-07-12 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107043 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/107043] range information not used in popcount

2023-07-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107043 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a5e47658904de9dc90f1292f3f69769177706f9 commit r14-2480-g7a5e47658904de9dc90f1292f3f69769177706f9 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/107043] range information not used in popcount

2022-09-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107043 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/107043] range information not used in popcount

2022-09-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107043 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/107043] range information not used in popcount

2022-09-27 Thread drepper.fsp+rhbz at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107043 --- Comment #2 from Ulrich Drepper --- My original example and Andrew's g0 are handled by Aldy's patches 2022-09-26 Aldy Hernandez PR tree-optimization/107009 * range-op.cc (operator_bitwise_and::op1_range): Optimize 0 = x &

[Bug tree-optimization/107043] range information not used in popcount

2022-09-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107043 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|