[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

2024-01-21 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

2023-07-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30dbfcd86c364da8491634ed4f99def184e2d042 commit r14-2467-g30dbfcd86c364da8491634ed4f99def184e2d042 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Wed Ju

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

2023-07-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:275a2124e4928c88bd5469096356ba393b6aadfb commit r14-2466-g275a2124e4928c88bd5469096356ba393b6aadfb Author: Roger Sayle Date: Wed Ju

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

2023-07-07 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

2022-07-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16aafa3194d4851a07cc204f56a5f0618f77e5d7 commit r13-1826-g16aafa3194d4851a07cc204f56a5f0618f77e5d7 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Mon Ju

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

2021-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC 11 is better (note the widen multiply is still not detected): movq%rdx, %rax movq%rdi, %r9 movq%rdx, %rdi mulq%rsi movq%rdx, %rax xorl

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

2019-09-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

2019-09-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Status