https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #28 from Peter Bergner ---
I totally agree, especially since the work in progress patch we did have to fix
the glibc build had so much fallout.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #26 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
As of r244815 I don't see the ICE building glibc. 193 FAILs in gcc.sum,
60 in g++.sum, which is comparable to the results I reported with the LRA
patches. I don't get ICEs from either of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #24 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #23)
> Fixed by patches on the trunk.
We only have a fix for the ICE in the first comment. We still do not have a
proper fix for the ICE in Comment 6. Since you've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #22 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Jan 19 02:23:35 2017
New Revision: 244609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244609&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78516
* config/rs6000/spe.md (mov_si_e500_sub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #21 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #20)
> Vlad, for the following change in the hunk above:
>
> > new_reg != NULL_RTX ? sreg : src,
>
> shouldn't that always be j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #20 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #19)
> emit_insn (GEN_FCN (sri.icode) (new_reg != NULL_RTX ? new_reg : dest,
> new_reg != NULL_RTX ? sreg : src,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #19 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #18)
> With the patch Vlad attached minus the one unwanted line/typo, I'm getting
> an ICE on a powerpc64le-linux bootstrap. Looking into it.
Here's a minimal test c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner ---
With the patch Vlad attached minus the one unwanted line/typo, I'm getting an
ICE on a powerpc64le-linux bootstrap. Looking into it.
/home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
>
> --- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner ---
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #15)
> Sorry, I applied your changes manually and did a typo. The line
>
> SET_SRC (curr_insn_set) = new_reg;
>
> should be removed.
>
> I tested this patch wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #15 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #11)
> > Created attachment 40372 [details]
> > The proposed patch
>
> Agreed your additions to my change looks g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #12)
> Created attachment 40373 [details]
> fnmatch.i preprocessed source
>
> With that new LRA patch (plus the previous gcc-pr78516.v2.diff) I get an ICE
> buildin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #11)
> Created attachment 40372 [details]
> The proposed patch
Agreed your additions to my change looks good. However, I'm not so sure about
this last hunk:
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #12 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Created attachment 40373
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40373&action=edit
fnmatch.i preprocessed source
With that new LRA patch (plus the previous gcc-pr78516.v2.diff) I get an ICE
b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Created attachment 40372
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40372&action=edit
The proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #8)
> where "src" is the subreg:SI ..., so the new_reg mode will be SImode and we
> then replace the whole SET_SRC (curr_insn_set) which is the subreg:SI
> (reg:DF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
That LRA patch (on top of the previous patch) allows the glibc build to
complete. Now running gcc/g++/libstdc++ testsuites (I haven't run them
with an unmodified copy of the same GCC versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #6)
> With the "updated fix" gcc-pr78516.v2.diff applied I get an ICE building
> glibc. Preprocessed source attached. Compile with:
> powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc -S -f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Created attachment 40329
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40329&action=edit
Preprocessed source
With the "updated fix" gcc-pr78516.v2.diff applied I get an ICE building glibc.
Preproce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40317|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
Created attachment 40317
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40317&action=edit
Potential fix to spe.md
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2)
> So we're hitting this code in lra-assigns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
So we're hitting this code in lra-assigns.c:lra_assign():1612:
if (flag_checking && !flag_ipa_ra)
for (i = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; i < max_regno; i++)
if (lra_reg_info[i].nrefs != 0 && reg_renumbe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
30 matches
Mail list logo
