https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 > > --- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #15) > > Sorry, I applied your changes manually and did a typo. The line > > > > SET_SRC (curr_insn_set) = new_reg; > > > > should be removed. > > > > I tested this patch with the typo on x86-64 and no new failures occurred. > > Strange. > > That would suggest on x86-64, SET_SRC (curr_insn_set) is never a subreg for > the > insns that we process here. As they say, better to be lucky than good! :-) > With the SPE, we're just not lucky as shown by Joseph's last run. I'm sure it > will pass after removing the unwanted line above. With this fix, my build completes OK and the number of FAILs is down from 105 to 62 in g++.sum and from 246 to 188 in gcc.sum (again, this is a rough comparison with a build from a month ago rather than an exact comparison against unmodified current mainline).
