https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Sep 13 17:06:33 2017
New Revision: 252468
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/72804
* config/rs6000/vsx.md (*vsx_le_per
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Aug 23 20:03:46 2017
New Revision: 251318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251318&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2017-08-17 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Aug 17 15:56:48 2017
New Revision: 251153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/72804
* config/rs6000/vsx.md (*vsx_le_per
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
I'm testing a patch. The root cause is that the vsx_le_permute_*,
vsx_le_perm_load_* and vsx_le_perm_store_* patterns do not support the TImode
values in integer registers and it is these patterns that LRA i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
*** Bug 71846 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Actually, enabling the movti_ppc64 isn't correct, since we have a
*vsx_mov_64bit pattern that covers this. The problem is that
*vsx_mov_64bit disparages the GPR alternatives with ?? so we don't use
them at e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
Using the following patch, I'm able to clean up the first simple test case:
Index: rs6000.c
===
--- rs6000.c(revision 239144)
+++ rs6000.c
11 matches
Mail list logo