--- Comment #7 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 14:56 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Shall we close this as WORKSFORME?
Looks like it.
--
joel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 02:26 ---
Shall we close this as WORKSFORME?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21578
--- Comment #5 from corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 05:38
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Is this still reproducible?
> A quick check with m68k-none-elf did not reproduce the ICE.
Confirmed, I can't reproduce it with my latest rtems-toolchain:
m68k-rtems4.7-gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 (
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:05 ---
Is this still reproducible?
A quick check with m68k-none-elf did not reproduce the ICE.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15
11:06 ---
I can reproduce the bug
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Additional Comments From cjohns at cybertec dot com dot au 2005-05-15
07:35 ---
Compile the patch with:
m68k-rtems-gcc -m5200 -fasm -O3 -g ejlex.i -c
The ICE only shows with -O3. Using -O2 compiles the file.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21578
--- Additional Comments From cjohns at cybertec dot com dot au 2005-05-15
07:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=8890)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8890&action=view)
Compressed preprocessed file showing the error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21
