https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I think invalid for GCC. Not sure how binutils will respond to a request to
do a lot of constant synthesis. And even if binutils handles it it's probably
a bad thing to do anyway -- think about the impac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
--- Comment #5 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Basically what I am saying this should be filed in gas rather than in GCC.
Yeah understood but is this really the right thing to do - to re-implement all
the con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Plus this seems like just a bug in the riscv llvm backend to accept this ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Plus shouldn't this be filed over to
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/issues for the assembler macro?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Basically what I am saying this should be filed in gas rather than in GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-29
Ever confirmed|0
