https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Basically what I am saying this should be filed in gas rather than in GCC.
[Bug target/118687] RISC-V extensions for inline asm code (vs. llvm)
pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Tue, 28 Jan 2025 17:12:07 -0800
- [Bug target/118687] New: RISC-V ex... vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/118687] RISC-V ex... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/118687] RISC-V ex... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/118687] RISC-V ex... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/118687] RISC-V ex... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/118687] RISC-V ex... vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/118687] RISC-V ex... law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/118687] RISC-V ex... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/118687] RISC-V ex... jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
