[Bug target/117850] GCC emits DUP, UMULL instead of UMULL2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/117850] GCC emits DUP, UMULL instead of UMULL2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > Am 29.11.2024 um 19:08 schrieb rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850 > > --- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford --- > (In reply to rguent...

[Bug target/117850] GCC emits DUP, UMULL instead of UMULL2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850 --- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2) > I dont See how this is easier? It's not to simplify things :) But isn't gimple_fold_builtin restricted to the same search/valueisation domain as match.

[Bug target/117850] GCC emits DUP, UMULL instead of UMULL2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > Am 29.11.2024 um 18:27 schrieb tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850 > >Bug ID: 117850 > Summary: GCC emits DUP, UMULL

[Bug target/117850] GCC emits DUP, UMULL instead of UMULL2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com