https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- > Am 29.11.2024 um 19:08 schrieb rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org > <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117850 > > --- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2) >> I dont See how this is easier? > > It's not to simplify things :) But isn't gimple_fold_builtin restricted to > the > same search/valueisation domain as match.pd? Or does gimple_fold_builtin have > more freedom to follow the argument definitions as far as it likes? Yes. Following use -> def as you Like is always OK From fold_stmt. Richard > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
