--- Comment #24 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-27 20:52
---
Can be closed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-27 18:40 ---
Subject: Bug 42832
Author: jason
Date: Thu May 27 18:39:46 2010
New Revision: 159940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159940
Log:
Revert:
PR libstdc++/42832
* include/std
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-05-21 08:28 ---
Subject: Re: Revisit std::function for aliasing issues
and efficiency
On Thu, 20 May 2010, jason at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 16:49
> ---
> The
--- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 16:49 ---
The alias_set_subset_of change isn't in 4.5? Then that's not what's making the
libstdc++ function tests pass with the swap change reverted...:)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42832
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-05-20 15:44 ---
Subject: Re: Revisit std::function for aliasing issues
and efficiency
On Thu, 20 May 2010, jason at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 15:40
> ---
> Aha
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 15:40 ---
Aha. That sounds good to me; I don't expect your testcase to work, because it
doesn't involve a char buffer. The copy does need to use the object
representation, but I think the new-expression should be undefined (t
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-05-20 15:17 ---
Subject: Re: Revisit std::function for aliasing issues
and efficiency
On Thu, 20 May 2010, jason at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 15:13
> ---
> Hmm
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 15:13 ---
Hmm...I tried reverting the change to functional::swap, but all the libstdc++
tests still pass on x86_64-linux, and I haven't been able to write a failing
testcase either. Anyone else have a testcase that still fails
--- Comment #16 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-27 15:57
---
Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42832
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-27 15:51
---
Doesn't depend on fixed memcpy, no longer blocks 42617. Depends on 42845
for enhancing the fix.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
