------- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de  2010-05-20 15:44 -------
Subject: Re:  Revisit std::function for aliasing issues
 and efficiency

On Thu, 20 May 2010, jason at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> ------- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-05-20 15:40 
> -------
> Aha.  That sounds good to me; I don't expect your testcase to work, because it
> doesn't involve a char buffer.  The copy does need to use the object
> representation, but I think the new-expression should be undefined (though the
> standard needs fixing to make it so--this is core issue 1027).
> 
> So, can we revert the function::swap change for 4.6, then?

Well.  It is probably safe (though I'd like to know how 44164 is
exactly broken - backporting that change doesn't fix that testcase).

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42832

Reply via email to