http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #10 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-02 16:40:34 UTC ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Sun Dec 2 16:40:28 2012
New Revision: 194055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194055
Log:
2012-12-02 Teresa Joh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #9 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-01
16:38:25 UTC ---
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:01 AM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de
wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
>
> --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf
> 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-01 09:01:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> Index: lto-cgraph.c
> ===
> --- lto-cgraph.c(revision 193999)
> ++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-01 07:16:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 28842
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28842
testcase
% c++ -fPIC -fno-exceptions -std=gnu++0x -flto -fprofile-use
-fprofile-cor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-01 07:14:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 28841
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28841
gcda testfile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-01
07:12:24 UTC ---
Hmm, I'm not sure how that assert can be hit, since we would have
returned earlier if none of the files being merged has any profile
runs. Presumably any profile run should hav
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-01 06:51:14 UTC ---
With your patch applied, Firefox fails to build:
/var/tmp/moz-build-dir/_virtualenv/bin/python
/var/tmp/mozilla-central/config/pythonpath.py -I../../../config
/var/tmp/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-11-30 22:20:43 UTC ---
On 2012.11.30 at 22:05 +, tejohnson at google dot com wrote:
> Found the issue. Doing final testing, but the patch is below. FTR, I
> couldn't do a slim-lto-bootstrap,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #2 from Teresa Johnson 2012-11-30
22:05:22 UTC ---
Found the issue. Doing final testing, but the patch is below. FTR, I
couldn't do a slim-lto-bootstrap, it appears this config file is not
yet committed to trunk? Reproduced wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #1 from Teresa Johnson 2012-11-30
17:38:07 UTC ---
Working on reproducing right now. Teresa
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:20 AM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de
wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
