https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Fixed on mainline for gcc-14.
>
> Shall we close it? Or does it deserve backporting?
Hi Harald,
I was considering a backport of a composite finalization patch to bri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:056280dea422ba831e40dee9e6769862927998c6
commit r14-1081-g056280dea422ba831e40dee9e6769862927998c6
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Tue M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #7)
> (In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3)
> > >
> > > I have marked this as "waiting" pending a contrary interpretation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #7)
> I haven't had a response from a current member of J3. Bob Corbett,
> a former member, believes the code is valid Fortran. Jeff Hammond
> notes that Cray Fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3)
> >
> > I have marked this as "waiting" pending a contrary interpretation.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
>
> Paul,
>
> I ask
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
--- Comment #6 from Ian Harvey ---
A module procedure is defined by a module subprogram (F2018 15.2.2.2p3). A
module subprogram (or any subprogram) is a syntax element (a piece of source
code), equivalent to /module-subprogram/ (see the first se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3)
>
> I have marked this as "waiting" pending a contrary interpretation.
>
> Cheers
>
Paul,
I asked on the J3 mailing list about the code.
https://mailm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-20
Ever confirmed|
14 matches
Mail list logo
